RobinGoodfellow
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Posts
- 2,439
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Sacramento
- Website
- twosparrows.5gigs.com
Re: Lindsay Lohan: "I wasn't driving. the BLACK kid was"
The problem with perception of something being racist is that it means that you need to worry the perception of every action, and that makes no sense; instead of just doing things, you need to worry about the perception of each and every one of your actions. And outside of politics, that just doesn't make any rational sense; where does it end? If a janitor points out that he is cleaning a black floor, does it mean that he thinks that all blacks are dirty? After all, I am using "black" in a differential sense; how is that any different than just differentiating someone, in an objective sense, on the basis of an obvious difference?
Yeah, I get that you are merely saying that what she said can be perceived as racist. At the same time, realize that you are okaying people to say that any statement, regardless of whether or not it actually was racist, can be racist just be perceiving it to be so...
That is sort of what this thread is about: Should a person be judged as being racist based on a statement that she didn't even say and that, even if true, was not inherently racist? Or is the statement that someone is black a racist statement?
RG
The problem is that being able to see both sides doesn't mean you need to give both sides credence. It's fine to state that which each side believes, but you can't always be on the fence; you aren't always allowed the benefit to believe in gray.Don't act as if you know what i'm doing. Just because i can see both sides doesn't mean i'm pro- one side or pro- the other. You've got some nerve to even think that.
The problem with perception of something being racist is that it means that you need to worry the perception of every action, and that makes no sense; instead of just doing things, you need to worry about the perception of each and every one of your actions. And outside of politics, that just doesn't make any rational sense; where does it end? If a janitor points out that he is cleaning a black floor, does it mean that he thinks that all blacks are dirty? After all, I am using "black" in a differential sense; how is that any different than just differentiating someone, in an objective sense, on the basis of an obvious difference?
The problem is that there is no difference, PR-wise, between being perceived as being racist and being racist; it's the same thing and there is no effective difference besides semantics. By pointing out that the perception is there, and that the perception is acceptable, you also point out that she is racist.If i wanted to say she was racist, i would have came out and said it. But i simply said it was perception - and it was. So unless you have something more pressing to accuse me of, i'd suggest you back off.
Yeah, I get that you are merely saying that what she said can be perceived as racist. At the same time, realize that you are okaying people to say that any statement, regardless of whether or not it actually was racist, can be racist just be perceiving it to be so...
That is sort of what this thread is about: Should a person be judged as being racist based on a statement that she didn't even say and that, even if true, was not inherently racist? Or is the statement that someone is black a racist statement?
RG



 ](*,)](/images/smilies/bang.gif)
















