Students read in English that Pandora had a box that was not to be opened, but in the original Greek it was a jar.
Where did I get the information that it was a jar? From reading it in the original Greek!
Institute for Justice was what the guy on the radio cited. I wouldn't be surprised if it was higher than ten percent.
"Easy enough"? How many people keep the receipts for every last thing they own, or documentation of where they got the cash they are carrying? Bank statements don't qualify because they don't show where the money came from, and you'd have to prove that you got the cash from a bank. And you have to go to court to get anything back; the police aren't just going to release it -- and how many people can afford the thousands of dollars of court costs, especially when generally a city or county or state can't be required to pay your court costs if you win?
Police have seized boats, camper trailers, and other expensive items merely by declaring they suspected it was acquired from drug money, ruining people's livelihoods and even costing people their homes and businesses, because there are no rules about civil forfeitures. This is why the Institute for Justice is pushing a case aimed at establishing that the seizure of property has to conform to the "due process of law" clause so that police have to prove in court that the property was acquired through drug money, they can't just take it.
The ACLU is involved in the fight as well. This isn't a very helpful article but it shows the issue:
https://www.aclu.org/issues/criminal-law-reform/reforming-police/asset-forfeiture-abuse
The Supreme Court ruled on one case but it hasn't made much of a difference; they're going to have to slap executive branches down a lot harder.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...laws-so-long-supreme-court-stepped-ncna974086