White Eagle
JubberClubber
............

I'm waiting to see if page 2 is any better.
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
............

The real question? Due to the Freedom of Information Act, the conversation between Nixon and Everett McKinley Dirksen (R. Illinois) tape has been released, expressing the above "Republicon Dirty Tricks".... more than only an assertion by the BBC. The real question is your inability to provide actual facts here.The real question is, what evidence is their that Nixon encouraged the South to withdraw from the talks. So far it is only an assertion by BBC.
 
	I don't even know why I'm doing this. What you read are not assertions. Richard M. Nixon resigned from the presidency on August 8, 1974. This is not an assertion. The burden of proof is not mine because we are not in open court. Nixon's dead. Your defense is not required. If you would like to visit his shrine, it is located in Yorba Linda, California. Please Google assertion.You guys are making the assertions, the burden is upon you to produce facts first.
Niixon was not impeached.Evidence would consist of actual quotations of testimony of persons who witnessed the conversations, or admissions by Nixon. Assertions by the newspaper are not evidence*.
Nixon was not impeached for talking to the Vietnamese, so that is not evidence.
Now I see the problem. You think that conclusions in newspapers are evidence.
Were you even around when Nixon was committing his crimes or is something you learned in history class? You've got it all wrong.
There has never been proof of the Democrat claim that he interfered with negotiations. Newspaper conclusions are not proof.
There has never been proof of the Democrat claim that he interfered with negotiations. Newspaper conclusions are not proof.
There has never been proof that you exist.There has never been proof of the [STRIKE]Democrat[/STRIKE] Democratic claim that he interfered with negotiations. Newspaper conclusions are not proof.
 
	
You didn't answer my question... do you remember this firsthand or did you read about this in some book you were handed.
I wasn't, and even I can see you're just trying to hide from the facts.
Me too! But they can never have children.Oh Springer.
And Benvolio....
I for one am so glad that you have found one another.

