"Male eggs" and male same-sex reproduction

[Level27]

I have been wondering about any updates to this topic for a while. So far, I found articles dated back to 2000-2005. I've read in these articles that eggs from human males is possible to create, but same-sex reproduction is not yet founded as a possibility. They discovered that there are activators on the female x chromosome eggs that haven't been found on the x chromosome of males. This was simply the last update that I found.

Is there anything more current on the subject?

More to the point, do you guys support such a thing as same-sex reproduction? Why or why not? Would like to read your guy's ideas and arguments.

 

[Ichimoto]

Ew.

I personally strongly dislike femboys, male pregnancy- anything that fits gays into a straight role or goes against nature in such a weird way. I'm not even into gay marriage- I just want to live forever with the one I love. None of that complicated stuff that can get in the way.

And quite frankly, I don't know why guys would WANT to experience birth.

 

[Level27]

For these gay guys, it's simply an honor to be a parent. This is not a heterosexual feeling, it's a human one.

Also, I'm not talking about male pregnancy; I made a completely different thread for that one about a few months back. I'm simply talking about the creation of a male egg, one that would be utilised and grown inside a gay man's surrogate sister. The process includes extracting the dna material of a female egg and then inserting the x-chromosome of a male in its place. The new genetic information of that egg can then, in theory, mate with the DNA of a sperm from another male, most notably the partner of the first male.

Finally, I think one should differentiate between male pregnancy and feminine boys. However, I'm not going to get into that as it's irrelevant to the point at hand.

 

[Ichimoto]

Finally, I think one should differentiate between male pregnancy and feminine boys. However, I'm not going to get into that as it's irrelevant to the point at hand.

I'm sorry if you thought that I was trying to create any major connection between the two. That wasn't my intention.

 

[yummylongsword]

I don't know why you would go so far out of your way to have genetic children when there are so many children already in the world who need and want loving families and homes. I mean, fine, it's one thing to have children if it comes naturally from sex, as it does with most straight couples. But if a couple has serious troubles conceiving, or if a gay couple forms... why go through so much effort to bring yet ANOTHER person into this world when there are already plenty that need to be cared for?

 

[Level27]

That is a very valid point. Though it's not related to the topic at hand, I think I can spare just this one post to go on this tangeant.

I think that for these people, the "rest of the world" simply does not exist; they see it at a personal and familiar level and want to carry on their lineage and pass down their genes to future generations, just like any heterosexual would. To them, it's not so much parenting for the sake parenting (although I think that would personally be nice). Rather, it's parenting to nurture the very things that would one day become them with their genetic imprint.

It might be of relief to you, though, that many of these people also are aware of homeless children as an issue. And, for those who do but still want biological children, they would compromise: they would try to have biological children as well as adopt. Some heterosexual parents do this too.

This is just a freebee. I like to get back on topic about male eggs alone, assuming that I have legitimate reason to wonder about them and to discuss them.

 

[Level27]

Huh. I guess this was a non-popular subject. Or was it simply that I posted it on the wrong date and/or the wrong time?

Or, was there simply no update to the subject matter? lol

 

[Telstra]

Why play with nature and waste money on male "eggs".

It is better to adopt or pay a woman to carry your baby.

 

[Esquire0399]

Why play with nature and waste money on male "eggs".

It is better to adopt or pay a woman to carry your baby.

That there is what we call an opinion. Not to say that I disagree with you (or agree for that matter), but every individual will have his/her own point of view of what is better.

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

Huh. I guess this was a non-popular subject. Or was it simply that I posted it on the wrong date and/or the wrong time?

Or, was there simply no update to the subject matter? lol

try genetic enginerrin sites

or put title HEY alls da DEGREES dudes need ya SUPER CLEVA HELP or somethin

ya do know like less 100 view hot topics ans like tiny numba like post

ans like ya know this porn site ans bet ya gos say all worngs a thangs ans some degree plug butt gonna say WHAT?

so here ma fast bit of think before jumb back in ta da cock spit

male female is same sex cause

but all thing possible cause humans already don all thing possible

time not keep memory guess it a what is wish da day > in come ya topic!
no care dudes fems machines make babbas

but humans cultures no figure Internet flat evens

so if a dudes make da babba ans da folks male grow ups it be same thang but thang is

human ( cultures )< catch connection Fix da other problem fisrts

-

no ask me question it hurt ma head

back ta sex porn ans dought nuts



has goodins
-

 

[2untru]

I remember hearing about this a few years ago and was interested in the topic (was on the news or discovery). I haven't heard anything since then.

I think it steps over a line with what is "natural", but then again the human race has done that so many times and for so long that it really doesn't matter.

Same sex parents wanting a biological child relating to both of them would be a new twist on a test-tube baby. I'm not necessarily for it, but I'm definitely not against it.

 

[Level27]

try genetic enginerrin sites

or put title HEY alls da DEGREES dudes need ya SUPER CLEVA HELP or somethin

ya do know like less 100 view hot topics ans like tiny numba like post

ans like ya know this porn site ans bet ya gos say all worngs a thangs ans some degree plug butt gonna say WHAT? (This is the hot-topic (in other words, off-topic) section of the forum, Mr. Intellect)-

and if zeh opinion of thread owns dem other folkz, allz would have reply'd same.

End point.

 

[EasyRory]

There was a recent lengthy article about male-male reproduction in the NY Times, iirc. Here is an abbreviated version:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/two-dad-mice/

 

[Telstra]

Science cannot, and should not try to play [STRIKE]GOD[/STRIKE] nature in any circumstances, however good they might be. Don't mess with what [STRIKE]God[/STRIKE] nature [STRIKE]has already created as Good[/STRIKE].

If a Gay couple wants children, then there's plenty of kids out there who wants loving Parents

fixed.

Unless you can explain what god is, leave god alone.

 

[sixthson]

Sometimes a genetic connection is pretty amazing. Just sayin'.

Sometimes.

I and my 9 siblings had a genetic connection with our parents. That is all we had. That was their choice, not ours.

However, I have no genetic connection with my children.
We have a more important connection: the heart connection. They know they are wanted and loved.

Which do you think is the better?

 

[mbamike]

I think it would be great for a same-sex couple to have children from their own DNA.

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

I think it would be great for a same-sex couple to have children from their own DNA.

it a possible humans may no has choice in matter such is da systems workin humanity inta jaws pandora no idea about

 

[Simon25]

Female-Female reporduction is possible, but Male-Male is not due to many factors that mostly have to do with the egg cell. We would have to add and do a lot to a sperm cell to make it able to "mate" with another sperm cell.

In otherwords, men (if you are good at it) make sex enjoyable, besides that we are not needed.

 

[Level27]

If a Gay couple wants children, then there's plenty of kids out there who wants loving Parents

I think I already addressed this point.

Hey, guys. If you guys want, I can create a new thread to discuss the importance and benefits (or the lack of) with same-sex biological kids. For this thread, however, please bring your focus back to same-sex reproduction and the creation of male eggs. I'd greatly appreciate it.

Thanks for the info, Simon. Do you have a link or source of some kind to support it? Or is this your personal theory? (Both are fine, I just want to be clear as to which one it is)

 

[andy12]

Science cannot, and should not try to play GOD in any circumstances, however good they might be. Don't mess with what God has already created as Good.

Agreed. We should get rid of hospitals as well.