The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

On Topic Discussion Massive cat kill planned by the Australian government

I'm not learned in evolutionary adaptations to say, but it would seem likely that competition led to an elevated arms race in the toxins arena.
 
The Simpsons introduce frogs to Australia


We just have to look in our own back yard to see what invasive species can do: killer bees (escaped from Brazil), zebra mussels (originally from southern Russia and Ukraine), the Asian carp...

And it's not only animals. It's plants as well: Japanese knotweed, purple loosestrife (brought in by settlers for their gardens), giant hogweed (brought in from Central Asia)...
 
In my home state of Arkansas, we had several invasive species of flora that were aggressively spreading, including Japanese Honeysuckle, privet, kudzu, Paulownia (Empress Tree), Mimosa, and Salt Cedar.

In New Mexico, many people are unaware the infamous tumbleweed is actually an invasive, Russian Thistle, and thought to have invaded in a shipment of flax seed around 1870.

And of course everyone has heard of all the tropical snakes now introduced to the Everglades. It's a mess.
 
^ There's a good reason they're called 'invasive species'. Nature is usually pretty good at maintaining a balance, but not where human interference is concerned.

(I didn't know that about the tumbleweed. Who'd a thunk it?)
 
The tumbleweed story is a bit obscured by misnomer. In Hollywood parlance, it becomes referred to as a tumbling sage. The sagebrush makes a similar form, but isn't the tumbleweed.

Most of the sagebrush in North America is in the genus Artemesia, but are not tumbleweeds.

Common names, as well as misnomers, are often at the root of popular misconceptions, such as people being wary of sumac tea merely because they are familiar with the name of ONE sumac when learning poison ivy, oak, and sumac. None of the entire rest of the sumac family is poisonous and the range of the poisonous one is very limited.
 
I always wondered why Australia has so many extremely poisonous species. Is it how the ecosystem fights invaders?

Seriously i thought you are smarter than this.
Have you visited Australia before ? There are no less or more extremely poisonous species in Australia than other places around the world.
Not sure what have you watched to form this conclusion.
 
Seriously i thought you are smarter than this.
Have you visited Australia before ? There are no less or more extremely poisonous species in Australia than other places around the world.
Not sure what have you watched to form this conclusion.

What happened to your fractured English? The only error is that you didn't capitalise 'I'.
 
OP, do you perhaps have Australian ancestry? So that you are compelled to think of Australia as your country by proxy?


see post #16 in thread
https://www.justusboys.com/forum/th...thers-in-CA-Synagogue?p=11320450#post11320450

No. Upon rethought, I'm glad of it. Please do keep your toxins there in your far corner of the world, evidently so boring that you are obsessed with American partisan politics. What a dry climate indeed it must be. It's obvious the Magnificent Spiders isn't the most misbegotten creature among the beasties.

The difference would be that I don't presume to intervene in Australian fauna or politics, whereas you go out of your way to foster further division in American politics, injecting them into threads that are wholly apolitical, and with the blessings of the management.

One can only assume there is an interest in fostering the harrying of members. It figures. Welcome back.

It's just how it is, obviously. It used to be against the CofC to bring material from one thread into the next. Now that has changed to only cover the no flame forum materials. It used to additionally explicitly forbid the quoting of private emails or comments, now no longer called out apparently. Things change.

Meh.
 
Back
Top