- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 123,002
- Reaction score
- 4,586
- Points
- 113
so fox and beck were involved from the beginning....lol
what a big circle this is going in.
Except they appear to have been hostile and not friendly.
this is all very interesting and at this point I have one question that I hope someone has an answer for...
If the movement started with the 2007 teaparty fundraiser by Ron Paul, then why did the 2009 people call themselves Tea baggers until they figured out what that meant sexually?
That was one beginning. Don't be so fixed on institutional continuity. Another was from these folks: http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxfreedomday/
Note in there the difference between tax freedom day and spending freedom day. The people (lots of us) who insisted the latter was more relevant were very much early Tea Party types, because we insisted that tax freedom day should come after spending freedom day, not the other way around: the day the country as a whole finished working to end the tax burden should come after the day when spending was covered (otherwise the debt was sitting there neglected).
Many people I'm acquainted with in the Tax Freedom ranks latched on to Paul's "Tea Party" fundraiser, just to try to get a candidate out there who would really talk about the debt.
Here's an article (I know, it's current) that illustrates the sort of ties between the Tax Freedom thing and the Tea Party movement/reasoning; I've seen this around since <gasp!> the Gulf War (the first one, when we didn't mess up an entire country). There were lots of people already doing "Tea Party" things, just with no unifying label.












 ](*,)](/images/smilies/bang.gif)







