The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Moral question, Putin has the right to

Telstra

JUB 10k Club
Banned
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Posts
43,486
Reaction score
30
Points
38
Location
Australia
order airstrikes ...
and private citizen has the right to shoot at anyone he/she feels responsible correct ??
And why or why not ??


http://www.news.com.au/world/middle...t/news-story/8678761871fa963d07d62ca83dc8caf8

russian-ambassador-turkey-shot-dead-ankara-art-show-revenge-syria-933x445.jpg
 
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
 
Russia has blood all over its hands with Syria and Aleppo because of their brutal support of Assad.

It wouldn't take much to inspire others to make a similar symbolic statement by killing more Russian ambassadors around the world.
 
[Quoted Post: Removed]

No Ben,
the question is, should world leaders be afraid .... be very afraid of the lone police "lone wolf".
Any leaders who do harm to others will get the treatment no matter how tight the security is ...
 
What you mean?
Shoot at the person who you think causes harm ?

Meaning that...Putin is Trump's ROLE MODEL of a world leader, and he would love to borrow as many of their tactics as possible to run this place.

And also that's why I said "[most of]" because there are some, such as yourself, who don't live near where this is threatening to happen. Also, of course, I borrowed the phrasing from "Coming soon, to a theater near you!" marketing slogan...which may or may not be a thing in Australian advertising.
 
Meaning that...Putin is Trump's ROLE MODEL of a world leader, and he would love to borrow as many of their tactics as possible to run this place.

And also that's why I said "[most of]" because there are some, such as yourself, who don't live near where this is threatening to happen. Also, of course, I borrowed the phrasing from "Coming soon, to a theater near you!" marketing slogan...which may or may not be a thing in Australian advertising.

I think the political battles (terrorists) between ideologies should be like this where not many people got killed, and not many innocent civilians die. Taking down one leader at a time is much more moral than mass terror killings.
 
Meaning that...Putin is Trump's ROLE MODEL of a world leader, and he would love to borrow as many of their tactics as possible to run this place.

And also that's why I said "[most of]" because there are some, such as yourself, who don't live near where this is threatening to happen. Also, of course, I borrowed the phrasing from "Coming soon, to a theater near you!" marketing slogan...which may or may not be a thing in Australian advertising.

Nonsense. Trump isn't in power yet. But we do know that Obama has preferred to rule by executive order. We hope Trump will return to constitutional rule.
 
Nonsense. Trump isn't in power yet.

Please learn to read. Everything frankfrank wrote in his post referred to the future, not the present. And let's hope Trump at least reads the Constitution before his big day on the world stage. He can't rule by it if he doesn't know what it is.
 
Well done to the assassin, just a shame he got killed, he was quite the looker.
 
Please learn to read. Everything frankfrank wrote in his post referred to the future, not the present. And let's hope Trump at least reads the Constitution before his big day on the world stage. He can't rule by it if he doesn't know what it is.
look again. He claim Putin IS Trumpd role model as a leader. We cannot know what he will be like until he becomes President.
 
Live by the sword, die by the sword.

we will soon have the most vile big mouth ever to sit in the white house----his words are violence in motion---we and out troops will suffer more then they have.

When The Tom Arnold tape comes out we will hear his violent big mouth in it's full n-word c-word glory lol
 
look again. He claim Putin IS Trumpd role model as a leader. We cannot know what he will be like until he becomes President.

I'm a wait, and see person who understands that high office molds its holder into becoming worthy of the position.

In view of Trump's well publicized track record it's one of those occasions, when the president-in-waiting remains a questionable source of considerable concern, until his actions prove otherwise.

We should know within twelve months whether Trump's administration can govern with prudence.
 
look again. He claim Putin IS Trumpd role model as a leader. We cannot know what he will be like until he becomes President.

If you insist on being pedantic about what others say...

Putin could be anyone's role model as a leader.
That doesn't make that person a leader.

As for Trump's leadership style, if anything his business leadership has shown mixed results and some very high profile failures. Trump steaks, anyone?

One thing the world doesn't need though is random assassinations. They don't stop problems.
 
And once again, Benvolio totally derails the thread.
 
I am much less critical of Mr. Putin and Russia in Syria than I am my own country. We are the one's who, starting in 2003, decided to destabilize the entire region with our idiocy.
 
How cum no one is talking about private citizens has the right to shoot any leader
as leaders has the right to order airstrikes ??
 
Example:
Saudi Arabia ordered airstrikes on Yemen.
And private citizens shoot Saudi leaders .... alot of problem might have being potentially solved by these actions.
 
Example:
Saudi Arabia ordered airstrikes on Yemen.
And private citizens shoot Saudi leaders .... alot of problem might have being potentially solved by these actions.

It is very simple. Government leaders are protected under by virtue of representing the state...unless they are ordering war crimes.

To to kill an individual ordering on behalf of the state is to defy the will of the people (state) and is therefore political assassination.

Which of course, is not permissable.

And why do you think that removing a couple of bad guys clears up the mess. Their replacements are ofter worse.
 
Back
Top