My proposal: bring back Latin.
Quod mortuum manet mortuos, nunquam resurget.
I was going to say that!
And I think William Shatner starred in the first and only movie filmed in Esperanto - just a pointless, possibly untrue tidbit.
Oops, I was wrong, it was the second:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incubus_(1965_film)
No,
Shatner was in that.
A few suggestions for a universal language off the top of my head:
- no complex verb conjugations or noun/pronoun/adjective declensions
- gendering (masculine, feminine, neuter, etc) should be optional (in English, you must choose he or she, it's not optional)
- no subjunctive mood
- no familiar vs formal or deferentialisms (eg tu/vous)
- few exceptions to the basic rules
- spelling should mirror sounds
Well, I could argue against each of these, but were I to do so, I'd be swatted down. You see what I did there? I use subjunctive sometimes!
As for "spelling should mirror sounds," that sounds good on the surface, but causes other problems. For one tiny example, are you saying that 'electric' and 'electricity' should be spelled 'elektrik' and 'elektrisiti' respectively? Do you see why that's a problem?
Also...well, there's this word 'secretary'. To make spelling mirror sound, you'd have to spell it 'sekretri' in England and 'sekretari' in the US. There are dozens of those. It's a problem.
[
ETA: Better example. 'Extraordinary' would be spelled 'ekstrordinari' in America, but 'kstradnri' in England! (Well, parts of it. And spelled differently for different classes, and yet another way on the BBC.)]
Now, those are issues with English, but remember that languages change over time, which is why we have odd spellings now (they used to mirror sounds, believe it or not). This will happen (perhaps more slowly with a high-tech world) eventually in your created language, and frustrate that good intention.
But also, all the invented languages are failures. Esperanto is the only one that comes close to being successful, and the only one that now has native speakers; but they all speak different dialects heavily influenced by the other languages everyone who speaks Esperanto must also speak, due to its never having caught on.
Don't even get me started about Loglan.
I really think we do have a universal language: English. Did you know that there are more people who speak English in China than there are in America? With all its flaws and awkwardness, it's the one that's got the distribution. Sort of the Microsoft of languages!