PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
^^Why do you think a comparison between familiarity with humans and familiarity with robots is apt?
Neat! I only first heard about the existence of Gullah a year or two ago, and I understand it was the language first spoken by one of the previous US Supreme court justices, was it not?I'm not sure if it's pertinent to the discussion, but I minored in Gullah at college.
Umm. Have you seen the video at the top of the thread? That's what I'm commenting on. It takes an hour to watch. I saw it when I first read the thread back in the day, and again to refresh my memory, but it does take a while to get through all of the points the two professors are making. It is a fascinating view of language and culture and class and everything. Kind of a geeky interest of mine.
I think the comparison of human reaction to familiarity might be apt though..
Oh a familiarity with familiarity type question.
Another thing I learned about recently is the existence of "Michif" which like Gullah is a blend of languages. It is part-cree and part-french, which means I can understand the French bits when I read it. It is fully merged between two languages and spoken by some Métis people, who (obviously) are groups of people descended from both Cree and French settlers, in western Canada, and largely had been rejected by both cultures.I'm not sure if it's pertinent to the discussion, but I minored in Gullah at college.
Yup. There seems to be a point where people can psychologically accept something (and perhaps someone) with clear unambiguous differences from themselves. Then people can also accept something (or someone) with almost perfect overlap to their own perspective, tastes, and so on. It's no big deal to accept someone else's differences if they already lie well within your own comfort zone.
But between those two ideals is a psychological blind spot where the whole thing breaks down.
- Opposites attract.
- Birds of a feather flock together.
- But in between those two points is someone who seems not like your reflection, and not like a friendly stranger, but like a fun-house mirror distortion of what you are, and it freaks people out.
Umm. Have you seen the video at the top of the thread? That's what I'm commenting on. It takes an hour to watch. I saw it when I first read the thread back in the day, and again to refresh my memory, but it does take a while to get through all of the points the two professors are making. It is a fascinating view of language and culture and class and everything. Kind of a geeky interest of mine.
You're welcome! Just thought it was a bit dodgy that this difference in speaking has been expoited for entertainment. But eh, what do I know.Thank you for your insightful, and on-topic reply to the thread.
You're welcome! Just thought it was a bit dodgy that this difference in speaking has been expoited for entertainment. But eh, what do I know.
I get mistaken for white over the phone because i speak in a neutral, "proper" diction.
Next question.
I see. So for example when you make an appointment to have your car serviced and then show up, the guy behind the desk announces "I thought you were white!"![]()
I'm going to have to disagree. I have spoken to many people on the phone that i have never met and once we did meet were shocked to see i was an AF-AM.
I get so much shit fro people both AF-AM and white for not sounding black or not black enough.
CXXX
