The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

New Orleans is STILL neglected.

Just_Believe18

of the 99%
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Posts
9,233
Reaction score
8
Points
0
I can't believe after two years, the city is still in the state that it is in. Read this editorial; it will infuriate you.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070826...my_hometown;_ylt=AsAHrKgHXbKAPteh1kXyIBBvzwcF

Editor: Pay heed to New Orleans' plight
By BRIAN SCHWANER, Associated Press writer Sun Aug 26, 12:30 PM ET
NEW ORLEANS - New Orleans is my hometown. And it's dying. Despite billions of dollars in aid, recovery programs with catchy names and an outpouring of volunteer effort, New Orleans is not recovering from Hurricane Katrina.

Beyond the happy mayhem of the French Quarter, entire neighborhoods are in ruins and the business district sags from the shattered economy. Thousands of people are homeless and squatting in vacant and storm-damaged properties, some just a few blocks from City Hall.

More than 160,000 residents never returned. For those who did dare to come back home, little resembles normalcy.

For the people with the power to save it, New Orleans is a forgotten place.

It's a national disgrace. People should pay attention. The next time, it could be your town.

A VIEW OF THE CRISIS

Katrina struck Aug. 29, 2005, flooding 80 percent of New Orleans and laying waste to the Mississippi coast. The feared worst-case storm lived up to every promise of horror.

Local, state and federal disaster officials bungled the rescue effort from the start, but in the city's darkest hour a presidential promise offered hope.

Barely two weeks after Katrina, President Bush stood in deserted Jackson Square before the majestic, eerily lit St. Louis Cathedral and pledged the nation to a massive reconstruction effort.

"When communities are rebuilt, they must be even better and stronger than before the storm," Bush said. Earlier, Bush told relief volunteers that government would be the solution, not the problem. "Bureaucracy is not going to stand in the way of getting the job done for the people," he said.

Nearly two years later, New Orleans is neither better nor stronger, and a bureaucratic stranglehold is choking off its recovery.

From a tinted window 25 stories above the New Orleans business district, I can see the city rotting from the inside out.

Across the street, Dominion Tower, once bustling with office workers and sprinkled with upscale retailers, is abandoned.

The adjacent Hyatt Hotel, where Super Bowl, Sugar Bowl and NCAA Final Four fans relaxed, also is empty.

Rows of camouflaged Humvees wait in a nearby parking lot for the military police who patrol lawless neighborhoods.

Just out of sight are wastelands where people live in cramped trailers or try to rebuild as best they can.

The only attention the city gets these days is as a campaign prop for some of the presidential contenders.

Among citizens, there is anger. There should be. For those who see New Orleans as someone else's agony, a caution: This kind of governmental and political nonchalance could greet you at your most dire moment.

The main program to help homeowners rebuild from Katrina — the $8 billion federally funded, state-administered and inaptly named Road Home — is going broke and may be short as much as $4 billion. Public schools, firehouses, police stations and transit routes are closed. Hospitals have not returned to normal capacity, and those that are open say they are losing millions of dollars providing medical care for the poor. There is little political will to build a levee system that would prevent the kind of flooding Katrina caused.

Federal, state and city officials can't even agree on priorities, or get aid dollars to where they are needed now. Mayor Ray Nagin, Gov. Kathleen Blanco and White House recovery director Don Powell play a blame game for the failed recovery. There are even whispers among the leaders of the effort that the city's problems are overblown.

They are dead wrong.

OK, NEW ORLEANS HAS BAGGAGE

If Katrina was the perfect storm, New Orleans was the perfect victim. Political corruption and incompetence in city government and an anemic economy made the city as vulnerable to turmoil as the levees that failed.

Sadly, the situation has worsened, and many of the leaders New Orleans must count on are fading from the scene or mired in scandal.

Take, for example, the representatives closest to the seats of power. U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., has been charged in an alleged international bribery scheme. He has denied wrongdoing. U.S. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., has been caught up in a Washington sex scandal. Blanco has thrown in the towel and isn't running for re-election following the failure of state-led recovery programs and largely ineffective pleas to Congress for more aid.

Even the city's emerging leadership was dealt a shock when City Councilman Oliver Thomas, seen as one of the "good guys" of the recovery effort and maybe a future mayor, pleaded guilty this month to federal bribery charges,

Meanwhile, the police chief and district attorney are feuding while the city grapples with a murder rate that is the worst per capita in the nation.

Even the mayor may be checking out. Nagin is raising money to campaign for a new political office — perhaps governor or congressman, he won't say which. With three years left on his term, the city needs his undivided attention.

President Bush, the city's self-declared savior, has been here 10 times since Katrina, half the visits in the first six weeks after the storm. In the past year, as the true scope of the failure of the recovery unfolded, Bush visited only twice. The city didn't even get a mention in his State of the Union address last January.

PAINFUL REALITIES

Many of the 270,000 people now living in New Orleans wonder how the nation can spend a half-trillion dollars in Iraq while this city remains wrecked.

"I can't believe this is the United States and after so long, so much is still not fixed," said Melanie Ehrlich, a Tulane University researcher. "It's scandalous, unforgivable."

It's worse than that.

Not far from the Ehrlich home, the 6000 block of Paris Avenue is deserted. Weeds obscure gutted houses. Gruesome gang-like symbols painted on their doors tell cryptic tales of what rescuers found when they pushed through Katrina's floodwater.

"It's like looking at the rapture," said the Rev. Jeremy Evans, 31, as he gazed out from the nearby Edgewater Baptist Church. Like the biblical call of the faithful to Heaven, people seem to have vanished.

Paris Avenue is not an exception. Hard-hit neighborhoods across the city could rot for years at the mercy of process-oriented bureaucrats.

Ilene Powell has had her fill of it.

Powell's home in Lakeview was hit hard by Katrina's flood. She applied to Road Home for a rebuilding grant, then spent 16 months in a maddening process of confusing paperwork, interviews and phone calls. Like thousands of others, she is shaken by the experience. "Just who are the rocket scientists running this mess?" she quips.

Actually, New Orleans does have rocket scientists at the Lockheed-Martin plant that serves the space shuttle program. But the remainder of its economy is shaky.

Perhaps taking cues from the leaderless, chaotic recovery, a crisis of confidence has tainted the local corporate contingent. Companies have heaped charitable contributions on the city, but some are pulling jobs out. There are murmurs that more may do so. Companies have a hard time getting executives to transfer here. Meanwhile, a University of New Orleans poll showed public sentiment is so bad that 29 percent of the current resident population may leave.

America should not allow New Orleans to die a slow death.


"No one in government has a true sense of the reality of what is happening here," Powell observed.

A great American city is withering. The people with power must be made to care.

And you should care — that it could be your hometown that is abandoned when the crisis is yours.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE — Brian Schwaner is the Louisiana news editor for The Associated Press, based in New Orleans. A New Orleans native whose family traces its roots in Louisiana to the 1760s, Schwaner is a graduate of East Jefferson High School in suburban Metairie and the University of New Orleans. Much of his career in journalism has been spent covering culture, politics and business in Louisiana. He joined AP in 2006 from The Cincinnati Enquirer, where he was assistant managing editor/business.
 
I'm really not surprised. Bush is not from New Orleans, nor are any of his cronies.
 
I used to care about NO, not anymore. The re-elected an incompetent racist for a mayor instead of somebody that could get the city rebuilt. The article cites the fact that tens of billions have been poured in, yet not much is rebuilt. Let them live in their filth and squalor. Not another dime for rebuilding.
 
I used to care about NO, not anymore. The re-elected an incompetent racist for a mayor instead of somebody that could get the city rebuilt. The article cites the fact that tens of billions have been poured in, yet not much is rebuilt. Let them live in their filth and squalor. Not another dime for rebuilding.

As if it's all the fault of the poor, the victims of this disaster? Can they help it the government screws them right & left?
 
It's got nothing to do with being poor or rich. I don't support rebuilding an area that's below sea level. That's flat stupid. I also don't support the government repeatedly paying for houses built right on the beach that wash away every couple of years. Nor do I support the government paying people in California who build houses dangerously close to the edges of mountains when they fall off of said mountains.

These are stupid endeavors which happen to have consequences from time to time.If you want to build in these areas, do so at your own risk. Don't expect me or anybody else to pay for your follies.
 
Well I gotta agree with Jack on this one. I don't understand why the government rebuilds these places.
 
Yeah...I think I'm with jack on this one, too. We should assist with re-location, not rebuilding. Nature always wins, eventually. Whether it's below sea level in Louisiana or on an eroding hillside in California, there are places where we just shouldn't try to set up housing.
 
The Netherlands doesn't seem to have a problem with existing successfully below sea level.
 
The Netherlands doesn't seem to have a problem with existing successfully below sea level.

They really don't have a whole lot of choice. We, on the other hand, have vast areas of flat, level land fit for habitation. Why would any rational person, build in an area that is unstable by its very nature? I get the whole beauty of the ocean thing. I get the breath taking view from a mountain top. But building in these areas represents a risk. A risk underwritten by the taxpayers every time mother nature damages these structures.

I recall a journalist, John Stoessal I believe, who told the story of his house in Long Island being damaged by storms three times. Each time, flood insurance paid for the damage. That is ridiculous. Build in an area that is stable or pay for damage yourself!
 
Please, you never cared about New Orleans because they are black and Democrat. Your posting history is a junkyard of hate on this subject.

We're not talking about Katrina, Alfie. We on the subject of rebuilding New Orleans. If you have a salient, coherent point as it relates to the subject, please share it with us.

Please, Joan Stossel is a raving lunatic and proven liar. But, that's why you like him and consider him/her a "journalist." Crazy WOEman, that's what she is.

I made no value judgement as to whether I like Mr. Stossel or not. Fact is, I'm indifferent towards him. I cited a story that he told on the air. If you have information that his house wasn't destroyed, or that the government didn't pay to repair it, I'm sure we'd be interested in that as well.

It's a bit curious that you tend to feminize those with whom you disagree, as if it were somehow evil to be a woman. You know, just because you're gay, doesn't excuse being a misogynist. Women make up half this planets population and they're some darned nice folks, too! Hate is unbecoming, my friend.
 
The Netherlands doesn't seem to have a problem with existing successfully below sea level.

The Netherlands doesn't have a problem with hurricanes. Let our taxes pay for something that is really needed. Let the people that insist on living in hurricane prone areas buy their insurance and leave the taxes alone...|
 
They really don't have a whole lot of choice. We, on the other hand, have vast areas of flat, level land fit for habitation.
I like to call that part of the US - Hurricane Alley. Perhaps you've heard of it? Why would any rational person build in an area that could be demolished at a whim by hurricane force winds?

Why would any rational person, build in an area that is unstable by its very nature? I get the whole beauty of the ocean thing. I get the breath taking view from a mountain top. But building in these areas represents a risk. A risk underwritten by the taxpayers every time mother nature damages these structures.

I recall a journalist, John Stoessal I believe, who told the story of his house in Long Island being damaged by storms three times. Each time, flood insurance paid for the damage. That is ridiculous. Build in an area that is stable or pay for damage yourself!
No matter where you choose to live in the US, there is a potential for a natural disaster to strike.

Avalanches, Hurricanes, Tornadoes, Volcanoes, Flooding, Fires, Earthquakes, Drought? Where is the best place to live?

From your reasoning, anytime a person is in a car accident they should pay for everything on their own. After all...
http://www.car-accidents.com/pages/stats.html said:
[SIZE=-1]There were nearly 6,420,000 auto accidents in the United States in 2005. The financial cost of these crashes is more than 230 Billion dollars. 2.9 million people were injured and 42,636 people killed. About 115 people die every day in vehicle crashes in the United States -- one death every 13 minutes.[/SIZE]
 
I like to call that part of the US - Hurricane Alley. Perhaps you've heard of it? Why would any rational person build in an area that could be demolished at a whim by hurricane force winds?

No matter where you choose to live in the US, there is a potential for a natural disaster to strike.

Avalanches, Hurricanes, Tornadoes, Volcanoes, Flooding, Fires, Earthquakes, Drought? Where is the best place to live?

From your reasoning, anytime a person is in a car accident they should pay for everything on their own. After all...

Your point is good up until the last sentence. Our tax dollars do not pay for your car accident.
 
The article posted by the OP is a definite exaggeration. I live in Baton Rouge, and I've been to New Orleans recently. The article makes it sound like the majority of the residents are living in the streets in piles of their own feces. This is not the case at all. Yes, there are still people without homes. Yes, there are abandoned businesses. But what are you going to do about it?

The wealthy population has moved out of New Orleans, and they're probably not coming back. Would you? If your city was destroyed by a hurricane, and you had the money, wouldn't you move too? New Orleans will probably never be back to its original state, but there's nothing to be done about it. You can't force people to move back to a city, and you can't force businesses to open either.
 
Let me see if I can't steer this thread back on topic.

There's a new documentary out that will be aired on a local PBS station tonight.

Check your local listings to see if it will be showing where you live.

Here are some details:

Film recounts family's struggle since Katrina


[SIZE=+1]TV: Emmy-winning Dallas filmmaker's documentary 'Still Waiting: Life After Katrina' airs Tuesday[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]10:32 AM CDT on Tuesday, August 28, 2007[/SIZE]


[SIZE=-1]By CHRIS VOGNAR / Staff Critic[/SIZE]

Home. It's your safe haven, your sanctuary from the world. But what happens when home is no longer home?
Also Online
links.gif
Interactive The two year toll: Life after Hurricane Katrina


That's the wrenching question at the heart of Still Waiting: Life After Katrina, directed by two-time Emmy-winning Dallas filmmaker Ginny Martin. Airing tonight on KERA-TV (Channel 13), Still Waiting zooms in on one family's tragic displacement that lingers two years after an unfathomable natural disaster.
"The power of home and attachment to place, the importance and strength of family and community, and what happens when that is threatened or taken away – that's the heart of the film," says Ms. Martin by phone Monday from her Dallas home.

Ms. Martin first met fellow Dallas resident Connie Tipado shortly after Katrina struck in August 2005. Most of Ms. Tipado's extended family hails from St. Bernard Parish, so when St. Bernard flooded she offered refuge and assistance to some 150 uprooted kin.
clikEnlarge.gif
082807gl_katrina2.jpg
Kate Browne
Katie Williams at the Saint Bernard Katrina Victim's Memorial in the documentary Still Waiting

Ms. Tipado's generosity and obligation to family is an inspiration. But Still Waiting, as the title suggests, is not a happy story.

As beloved family members, including her mom, Audrey May, trickle back into the parish, they settle not into their old homey community but FEMA trailers. In need of a handicapped-accessible trailer, Ms. May waits six months. Racial tensions, already high in the mostly white working-class community, grow higher as competition for jobs and assistance becomes fierce.
Then there are the intangibles, those things that give meaning to the word "home."

"They've become more isolated from each other," says Ms. Martin. "The family is used to gathering every Sunday or Wednesday night. But you have to have a home to do that. You can't gather the whole family into a little 8-by-10 trailer."

If Spike Lee's epic When the Levees Broke is a sweeping look at the systemic failure that led up to and followed Katrina, Still Waiting is the family snapshot that got washed away in the flood. There's a degree of anger at a system that allows people to languish in a virtual no man's land, but there's more sadness in the process by which a close family sees its ties frayed.

"It will never be the same, and that is what has been so heartbreaking to them," says Ms. Martin. "All along the most important goal for them was to go home. Home to them was the way things used to be, the way they've always been for generations. Now that they're back, that hope of restoring what they've always had is diminishing because the recovery process is just not happening.


Still Waiting: Life After Katrina
Tuesday at 8 p.m. on KERA (Channel 13)

Source: Dallas Morning News

Here's another link directly to the Documentary itself:

Still Waiting | Life After Katrina
 
The article posted by the OP is a definite exaggeration. I live in Baton Rouge, and I've been to New Orleans recently. The article makes it sound like the majority of the residents are living in the streets in piles of their own feces. This is not the case at all. Yes, there are still people without homes. Yes, there are abandoned businesses. But what are you going to do about it?

The wealthy population has moved out of New Orleans, and they're probably not coming back. Would you? If your city was destroyed by a hurricane, and you had the money, wouldn't you move too? New Orleans will probably never be back to its original state, but there's nothing to be done about it. You can't force people to move back to a city, and you can't force businesses to open either.

You're right, but what's not mentioned is what we're doing about helping those who want to return, or who are still there waiting for the promised help that would come, that apparently hasn't beyond FEMA trailors.
 
Frankly, I am tired of hearing about rebuilding New Orleans. Most of the city is under sea level. Let's just forget about this crime ridden murder capital of the US.The French Quarter and environs is above sea level and can be salvaged..
 
The Netherlands doesn't have a problem with hurricanes.
Hurricanes obviously no since they do not form that far north. But they have big storms off the North Sea that can cause just as much (flood) damage. Just because they aren't labeled as "hurricanes" doesn't make them any less dangerous. They have a storm surge barrier for a very real reason.
 
Back
Top