So you admit your problem and biggest flawI <3 you kenny!
As for belamy: It may be there for "real thinking people" to read, it's just a shame it wasn't written by one.As wrong as I've seen you be in many threads that I skimmed through
Care to be less vague about those threads in which you say I was so wrong?
After you think you have refuted because you never considered you could be refuted.
I wonder if you would have said the same if I had just substituted that "indeed" for the "no" and retained the exact same development deriving from it, with the same referent and implications for "indeed" but under the "no" word.
Your whole case seems to hinge upon the assumption of meanings out of dictionaries and lexicons, and it's not surprising, given the practice you admitted of skimming thorugh texts, of believing you know the sense of what you think you are reading.
I may have not been careful enough by not taking skimmers into account, but never inaccurate in the whole, from the surface to the depths, and you could have cared to point out explicitly how I was inaccurate: a single post referring to the origin of it all would have been enough, but you kept skimming surfaces
Now you can go join the cows
