Re: NM school in trouble for gay couple in yearboo
i don't get what the difference is between gay couples, and straight couples that are often, knowingly or not, plastered all over yearbooks, unless they were doing something obscene like kissing with their hand down each other's pants. unless it was something overt then this is all your basic homophobia.
Yes, it really is simple homophobia. But for the sake of argument, the school can assert that same sex couples should not be featured in the yearbook b/c...
1. The pictures promote sexual relationships. It appears that most JUBBERS (and Americans) define their sexuality by who they lust after or by who they hook up w/. Little Adam is a gay kid b/c he thinks little Steve is hot. He lusts after his body, he wants to have sex w/ him, they "do stuff" to each other so posting little Adam and little Steve together is a direct display of sexual passion. Other students will see the picture and will think of sex and will think it's cool to get it on. Parents and community members will see the annual and will accuse the school of promoting promiscuous behavior among high school teens. Clearly this must be stopped. Of course, the counter argument is that pictures of hetero teen couples also promotes sexual relationships. Stereotypically though, girls are thought of as pure and good (it's the young fellas that are horn dogs) so the counter argument isn't as strong.
2. Depicting same sex couples will create a disruption in the classrooms. The yearbook has just come out and for the first time ever, Eve and Eva are shown as a couple in love. The students will talk about this for ages and will not be able to concentrate on their school work. The teens will gossip (we all know how disruptive kids can be) and the teachers will loose control of their classrooms.
3. Allowing same sex couples to be featured in an annual has the potential to cause physical harm to the students. Legally, schools are generally not required to provide the students w/ a safe environment, but just imagine all the violence that could potentially break out after the students saw the yearbook. There are probably some gay bashers at the school who will be enraged. There are probably some closet case kids who will want to fight. The halls, restrooms, locker rooms, and classrooms won't be safe. Everyone would have to be on constant guard and the school shouldn't be expected to pay for security guards. The school probably can't afford security guards. Also, what if a crazy community member were to come onto school grounds in order to teach the homo lovers a lesson. The school will not want to open itself up to these potential threats.
4. The pictures will sensationalize the school and damage its reputation. Schools also receive grants and other types of funding that must be sought after from the state government. Having such a scandal could cause these funds to dwindle down. Also, the school has been featured in the media for this incident which is never a positive experience. Colleges may stop recruiting there, community members may w/draw support, the media will certainly be a permanent fixture for a while. Instead of the school being viewed as an educational institution, it will be viewed as a hot spot for gay hook ups and teen age rebellion. It's like going from the NY Times to the National Enquirer. This will of course harm the student body and the community.
5. Depicting same sex couples in the yearbook is a political statement and the school will want to distance itself from it. It's no mystery that the homosexual and gender identity civil rights movement is on the rise (at least a bit). Several states and cities are questioning their laws and the voters passions run high. It's a volatile issue. Now, the yearbook is a school sponsored publication and featuring gay couples in the publications will cause the public to assume that the school is supporting, even favoring homosexuality. Whether they are for or against, public schools really shouldn't make political statements. Students can campaign and state their beliefs but the school, as an entity, shouldn't endorse these actions.
There are more arguments and vice versa but this is already pretty long.