No blacks no Asians no curry no spice... yeah it's definitely racism so stop trying say it's a sexual preference

[DepravedMuscleFTL]

by the way I am not often attracted to Asian men - but I ran across this critter last night on The Next Thing In Fashion - his name is Dao-Yi Chow and he is a street/active wear designer and one of the founders of Public School - pictured with his biz partner - I think he pretty freakin hot....

 

[Vannie]

Hoody...I can come over naked with my Lil Nas X mask on if you want!

 

[HoodedRat]

^
Much as I love Lil Nas X, you don't need the mask .

 

[PalacePaul]

All interesting posts here.

Over the years, I have found men of every race and ethnicity very attractive because of certain physical qualities perhaps, but also because of the way they present themselves with their body language, eyes and often, their smile. So i don't understand why some guys are exclusively attracted to a single race any more than I understand why some white guys don't find red heads attractive...or won't date short guys, etc.

... and since we are talking about SEXUAL attraction, there is "chemistry"... something I can't really explain that makes me like a guy... the way he kisses, the way he touches, how kinky he is...
I said that I don't like Indian guys but if I had to choose between a kinky Indian, a dull black, or a white who can't kiss... I'd pick the Indian for sure.

 

[sixthson]

^
Much as I love Lil Nas X, you don't need the mask .

Have you seen him without the mask???

 

[Vannie]

Have you seen him without the mask???

.......

 

[rareboy]

Have you seen him without the mask???

Yup. Looks pretty fine to me. I don't get the point you are making.

 

[mikey3000]

NO SIR - different races have traits beyond different colour - hair - hair texture - hair colour - eye shape - eye color - etc. - culture - values - beliefs - religion - these are just a few examples that give varying degrees of attractiveness to varying people ...

Do you realize that all these physical features you listed are the basis and reasoning behind prejudice and racism all throughout history?

 

[mikey3000]

All interesting posts here.



... and since we are talking about SEXUAL attraction, there is "chemistry"... something I can't really explain that makes me like a guy... the way he kisses, the way he touches, how kinky he is...

As far as I know, one cannot determine "chemistry" from an ad, especially one that is so exclusive.

 

[epeboy]

You said preferences. Those ones I mentioned were preferences.

So let's line up five men. One black, one white, one Asian, one South Asian, and one Aboriginal. What are the biological differences that would determine preference? They all have a dick, two eyes, two arms and legs, hair, a butt. What is the only difference between them? Colour.

um. who are we to dictate someone's libido and sexual attraction? if they don't want this and that, then they don't want it. Same thing, if a person doesn't like another person because of how his/her preferences, they don't have to hook up with each other. That's going to be a bad way to start a relationship.

If I see a profile in grindr that says no to asians, or fat/chubby people, I'm not offended to be honest. I'm thankful I see a sign that we're not going to be compatible. I have a chance to stay away from those people. After all, I also do have my own preferences. I just don't post them on my profile, I just don't reply and also I let them down easily (doesn't happen often though).

But context wise, I am, going to say one thing. If there is a service that is essential that's going to undermine the safety of an individual (security/health etc), it should be given to everyone regardless of race. Such as hospital, police, government services, public school, shelter etc. We can make laws that enforce the giving of these services and those who work in those areas need to give it or else get out of such line of jobs.

But if it's a private thing like sexual attraction, making your own grindr profile or even baking a cake. These are non essential things we can live without and get from other suppliers/people. It's up to you to post a bad review on yelp or something but there shouldn't be laws to force these private individuals to do otherwise. there shouldn't be threats (physical/mental/emotional) that will force these private individuals to act otherwise. Let your friends other people decide if they'll listen and read your bad review and avoid the establishments themselves and let the law of supply and demand run its course.


Back to the sexual preference thing... So, you run across someone who is using their freedom of speech to say who they want.

Will arguing with them change their preferences somehow?

 

[epeboy]

Ageism, classism, racism... how do you call prejudice based on perceived intelligence?

My philo teacher said it's still sapiosexual. It is it's own antonym. A sapiosexual loves intelligent people. But at the same time, a sapiosexual hates dumb people.

 

[HoodedRat]

Yup. Looks pretty fine to me. I don't get the point you are making.

*whoosh*

Meanwhile, Lil Nas X is a total babe and he's mine!

 

[Vannie]

Yup. Looks pretty fine to me. I don't get the point you are making.

six was talking about me taking off my mask visiting Hoody. Why that lutefisk eatin Hooligan!

 

[belamyi]

My philo teacher said it's still sapiosexual. It is it's own antonym. A sapiosexual loves intelligent people. But at the same time, a sapiosexual hates dumb people.

That's because the concept has not been developed: you either make up some sort of "philo-" or "-phobic" term, or the appropriate "-ism" one.

 

[KaraBulut]

...lutefisk eatin...

Ew.

 

[Vannie]

Ew.

Why...because its made with white fish?

 

[KaraBulut]

My philo teacher said it's still sapiosexual. It is it's own antonym. A sapiosexual loves intelligent people. But at the same time, a sapiosexual hates dumb people.

That's because the concept has not been developed: you either make up some sort of "philo-" or "-phobic" term, or the appropriate "-ism" one.

This brings up the problem with the whole "No ____" approach.

Just because you are attracted to intelligent people (defined as "a person who finds intelligence sexually attractive or arousing.") doesn't mean that you "hate" or are repulsed by people that you perceive as not intelligent.

The thing that always bugs me when I see people say, "No _____" (fill in the blank with your derogatory term of choice) is that it really says something about the person and what being in a relationship with the person would be like.

If you were to write an blurb that says, "GWM, educated, successful looking for same" that defines what you're looking for. On the other hand, if you write, "No uneducated stupid people", that says more about you than it does about the people you might be looking for. The same holds true for all of the other exclusion statements mentioned in the long history of discussion of this issue.

 

[Kahaih]

Is this thread about finding a life-partner or finding someone for a one-time fuck?

Whims or relationships?

 

[belamyi]

This brings up the problem with the whole "No ____" approach.

Just because you are attracted to intelligent people (defined as "a person who finds intelligence sexually attractive or arousing.") doesn't mean that you "hate" or are repulsed by people that you perceive as not intelligent.

The thing that always bugs me when I see people say, "No _____" (fill in the blank with your derogatory term of choice) is that it really says something about the person and what being in a relationship with the person would be like.

If you were to write an blurb that says, "GWM, educated, successful looking for same" that defines what you're looking for. On the other hand, if you write, "No uneducated stupid people", that says more about you than it does about the people you might be looking for. The same holds true for all of the other exclusion statements mentioned in the long history of discussion of this issue.

That's right: if you want to get something, go buy it, and you will get what you are paying for.

If you want a "real thing", simply go "get real".

Oh, and the exact same thing that people usually say about "intelligence", like you commented, is what goes for "good looks": there are as few truly intelligent people as there are truly good-looking, much less both things together. People boasting about intelligence or looks are boasting about shortcomings.
People are easily talented, but that is restricted to a part of general intelligence, and the same goes for looks: only part of the whole can be that exceptional, when at all.

So much for chances to fall in love with belamo, or belamo falling in love with anyone

 

[epeboy]

Question though. What would you get out of berating someone about their "preferences"?

You see a grindr profile posting "no asians".

Will telling him to erase it and stop make him accept asians?

How would we know he changed his mind or way of thinking?

Do we assign police round the clock to make sure he sleeps with asians?