Obama doesn't deserve reelection

[justapixel]

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/81213-52-say-obama-doesnt-deserve-reelection-

Finally, Americans understand that they have elected another Jimmy Carter.

It took them long enough to realize it.

52 percent of Americans said President Barack Obama doesn't deserve reelection in 2012, according to a new poll.

Obama faces a 44-52 deficit among both all Americans and registered voters, according to a CNN/Opinion Research poll released Tuesday. Four percent had no opinion.

 

[cumwhore]

He is a corporate whore and nothing more.

 

[NineOfClubs]

Other US Presidents have been this low, this down, early in their first administration and have pulled out of it, even to win a second term.

However, I think Barack Obama lacks the political skills and experience most of his predecessors had. Also his very nature is one of inflexibility.

 

[opinterph]

another Jimmy Carter.

In terms of approval polling (or for that matter premature deserve reelection polling), Obama’s results at this point in his presidency are perhaps more appropriately viewed in comparison to Ronald Reagan.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/presidential-approval-tracker.htm

 

[Jack Springer]

Let the excuses begin . . . .

 

[TickTockMan]

On any given day it's going to be about 50-50. Your link doesn't mean much. Hell many felt he needed to be impeached before he even got in office. 52% is an empty percent.

 

[Semirhage666]

Finally, Americans understand that they have elected another Jimmy Carter.

Care to explain what exactly that statement says about him for those of us who aren't old?



And were we honestly supposed to instead vote for someone who would continue the stripping away of the American peoples' civil rights that we've endured the last 8 years?

 

[CoolBlue71]

The Republican Party "doesn't deserve" the presidency for [at least] 20 years after the final full year of 43rd president of the United States George W. Bush, the Herbert Hoover of his generation.

 

[redbull4u]

George "W" Bush.... now we have Barack "W" Obama ( not Hussein).

The W stands for Wallstreet.

 

[01solara]

Care to explain what exactly that statement says about him for those of us who aren't old?



And were we honestly supposed to instead vote for someone who would continue the stripping away of the American peoples' civil rights that we've endured the last 8 years?

If you voted for Barak Obama that is exactly what you did. He seems to think you have no right to privacy on your email or cell phones and he has continued and even further enhanced the Bush policies you so disliked.

 

[JB3]

Care to explain what exactly that statement says about him for those of us who aren't old?



And were we honestly supposed to instead vote for someone who would continue the stripping away of the American peoples' civil rights that we've endured the last 8 years?

You did. In case you hadn't noticed, Obama's policies aren't that different than Bush's, despite his campaign rhetoric promising that they would be.

 

[hotatlboi]

Even though his approval has gone down, the Republican party still has to field a candidate with greater approval to defeat him in the next election. I've seen no one that looks capable of that thus far. I have seen one or two that are sure fails though.

And despite Obama and the Dems general loss in popularity, Republican popularity is still low as well.

 

[JB3]

Even though his approval has gone down, the Republican party still has to field a candidate with greater approval to defeat him in the next election. I've seen no one that looks capable of that thus far. I have seen one or two that are sure fails though.

And despite Obama and the Dems general loss in popularity, Republican popularity is still low as well.

This is true. However, for better or worse (almost entirely worse in regards to gay rights) republicans are staying pretty steady or increasing marginally with their popularity while democrats are declining very quickly.

It all depends on who runs on the republican side and whether Obama is challenged on the democratic side. (I can almost guarantee Palin won't win on the republican, but I'm not sure who else there is. I think it honestly will be a 'dark horse' candidate.)

 

[JB3]

Look at the Republicans and conservatives here racing through the internet scrounging for a poll, any poll, that shows Obama's popularity below 50%, and then proceeding to throw a party over what they think shows how much he has failed. Good god...
.

Funny, you'd do the same thing if you found a poll that you agreed with politically. But, because this one doesn't, you bash it.


Personally, I don't buy into any polls like this, since we're still way too far out for it to mean anything.

 

[JB3]

I don't really see much in common between Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama. I admire Carter a lot, especially for his work with Habitat for Humanity. Even though I voted for Obama, I see him and his gang now as a bunch of DINOs (Democrats in Name Only) and bending over for the right and the entrenched big-money interests. Carter didn't do that. I am honestly hoping that Obama does not run for a second term, or at least that a challenger who truly represents the left will defeat him in the primaries.

Do you have any recollection of what an utter failure Carter was when he was actually president? That is the Carter people are referring to, not the Carter that he has become.

 

[NineOfClubs]

Do you have any recollection of what an utter failure Carter was when he was actually president? That is the Carter people are referring to, not the Carter that he has become.

All through his presidency, I liked Carter, as a person.

But I found his governance of the country, and the mess we were in, intolerable.

Not unlike some Americans are feeling about our President today.

 

[Ambrocious]

Let us look at some reason why Obama is not fairing well shall we:


Obama promised to NOT use signing statements as a way to gain complete control over bills but then he turns around and does them. Obama said he was AGAINST signing statements because Bush was doing them and it was wrong, but he used them anyways.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seAR1S1Mjkc]Obama Promises To Not Use Signing Statements[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVvoKc_fxMg]Obama Uses Signing Statements[/ame] (For additional info on this watch Fall of the Republic)



If it was bad for Bush and Obama called Bush out for it, maybe he should keep his promises too.






Obama Declares He Will Rule by Authoritarian Decree:

The Obama administration has announced it will now rule by fascist decree and ignore Congress and the American people.

[Quote truncated by moderator] © 2010 Alex Jones | Infowars.com is an Alex Jones company. All rights reserved.

SOURCE

So Obama isn't just doing things HIS way as if it was all OK, he is committing treason and still he is allowed to do anything that he wants, even if people don't want it.
(For another example of treason that Obama has committed, read this article)


This is just a small fraction of things that Obama is doing that is not so good but just remember, like Bush, he is set in place to take the blame when all goes bad. The people truly responsible such as the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission an the Council on Foreign Relations never get into that much trouble.

It is important to know that Barack H. Obama is simply a puppet of the new world order and he has to follow through with his orders. The same people who controlled Bush now continue to control Obama.



As always, I constantly ask that you don't just believe everything I say. Please go look for yourself and find out of this is true. I also will post the links to films that are vitally important and I think every free person with a good heart should know about.



The following four films are crucial to understand what we are actually dealing with, not with just what is being told to you by the television and by your leaders. I ask that you take into consideration the information in these films as they are not lies nor are they conspiracy theories.





TerrorStorm [Made In 2006]


ENDGAME: Blueprint For Global Enslavement [Made In 2007]


The Obama Deception [Made In March 2009]


Fall of the Republic [Made In October 2009]

 

[Semirhage666]

If you voted for Barak Obama that is exactly what you did. He seems to think you have no right to privacy on your email or cell phones and he has continued and even further enhanced the Bush policies you so disliked.

Really? He's continued to try to chip away at abortion rights? He's tried to pass legislation that further restricts gay rights? I don't think so.

Nor has he continued the retarded policy banning federal stem cell research funding.

 

[Ambrocious]

Really? He's continued to try to chip away at abortion rights? He's tried to pass legislation that further restricts gay rights? I don't think so.

Nor has he continued the retarded policy banning federal stem cell research funding.

As you know Bush was all for warrentless wiretapping and if Im correct he said he wasn't for that, but he simply continued it and EXPANDED IT. Yes he is continuing and expending what Bush did including Rendition which is the kidnapping of people without warrants which Bush brought about through PDD51.



In Warrantless Wiretapping Case, Obama DOJ’s New Arguments Are Worse Than Bush’s

Friday evening, in a motion to dismiss Jewel v. NSA, EFF’s litigation against the National Security Agency for the warrantless wiretapping of countless Americans, the Obama Administration’s made two deeply troubling arguments.

First, they argued, exactly as the Bush Administration did on countless occasions, that the state secrets privilege requires the court to dismiss the issue out of hand. They argue that simply allowing the case to continue “would cause exceptionally grave harm to national security.” As in the past, this is a blatant ploy to dismiss the litigation without allowing the courts to consider the evidence.

It’s an especially disappointing argument to hear from the Obama Administration. As a candidate, Senator Obama lamented that the Bush Administration “invoked a legal tool known as the ’state secrets’ privilege more than any other previous administration to get cases thrown out of civil court.” He was right then, and we’re dismayed that he and his team seem to have forgotten.

Sad as that is, it’s the Department Of Justice’s second argument that is the most pernicious. The DOJ claims that the U.S. Government is completely immune from litigation for illegal spying — that the Government can never be sued for surveillance that violates federal privacy statutes.

This is a radical assertion that is utterly unprecedented. No one — not the White House, not the Justice Department, not any member of Congress, and not the Bush Administration — has ever interpreted the law this way.

SOURCE




AND




Obama Orders Continuation Of Illegal CIA Renditions

Human Rights Watch: Illegal kidnapping and imprisonment under Bush = “basic violation”, illegal kidnapping and imprisonment under Obama = “legitimate”

One of president Obama’s first actions in office was to sign an executive order securing the continued practice of secretly capturing, transporting and imprisoning so called “enemy combatants” it has been revealed.

Under executive orders issued by Obama just two days into his tenure, the CIA still has authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States, the Los Angeles Times reports.

“The Obama administration appears to have determined that the rendition program was one component of the Bush administration’s war on terrorism that it could not afford to discard.” writes Greg Miller.

A minor provision within one executive order states that instructions to close the CIA’s secret prisons “do not refer to facilities used only to hold people on a short-term, transitory basis”, meaning that some so called “black sites” can remain open.

FULL ARTICLE


Yes, Obama has continued what Bush has done. Don't just look at things pertaining to the gay and lesbian community as if we consist of the whole world as being the only important thing on earth. See past the issues we only deal with (they are important yes) and see the whole picture please. There is a world outside of the gay and lesbian world, regardless that this is on JUB, just have a larger view on things and have a little empathy.

 

[Ambrocious]

Hey opinterph, you know why they always say read the small print? Because sometimes thats how they entrap people. But since you have made my print small, most people wont bother with it as if it were not important. Can you please at least set it to the normal font size? What you just did to my post is a really good example of discrimination and I would appreciate it if you set it to the default text size if my posts make you that upset.

What next? Total removal of my postings...oh that's right, you guys already do that to me. I feel so silly. Enjoy the power trip, I know you are. Love you!


As for it being copyright material...Alex Jones ENCOURAGES people to share his DVD's AND copy them for FREE! So your abuse of power because you disagree is unnecessary altogether.