It is a double edge sword involving Wright, and I agree that is odd that he spoken what he spoken when it is politically inconvienent. However, Wright must have been a good pastor and must have spoken the word in such way that touch and Obama felt for him to stay as long. The "trustworthy" can be said about Hillary Clinton, but that is moot point.
Wright was a good pastor for Obama, or he wouldn't have stayed 20 years. Yes.
And that's the point. Voters are reasonably concerned (or pleased) that Wright's sentiments are living in Obama's thoughts and agenda, which is bolstered by Mrs. Obama's comments.
I think Obama could help heal this nation where race is concerned. I really do. But he's not ready. He's still too conflicted, not yet fully his own man. He has pieces of his white mother who left him with her parents while she went off on her free-spirited (and frankly irresponsible as a mother) life, pieces of his black father who abandoned him (not literally but that's how it feels to children of divorce), his grandfather who was apparently white-outraged at his wife's fear of black aggressors, his grandmother who provided the security he needed but also feared black men and that's a part of who he was/is. He has pieces of Reverend Wright in him and pieces of Rezko, and of Michelle and all his other experiences. He hasn't yet integrated them into a single man's convictions, and that makes him not yet ready to be President. He's just not ready.
Hillary Clinton is ready. Is she perfect? My god no. But nobody is. And she is ready to be President. She's worked through all that conflict-of-life stuff that Obama needs another good ten years to deal with.
You are right Obama doesn't know what is like to be a woman or gay. We all have identifiers that the ethnic ones are more prominent than others due to the fact one can not change nor hide their skin color.
Well the ethnic ones are more prominent to blacks and Latinos and Asians in America, but not to whites. We forget we're white and so other identifiers are more prominent. All identifiers are prominent if it's an identifer you wear. Of course, some identifiers are more of a burden and some are more of a privilege, and being black generally belongs in the more of a burden column -- but Ferraro was right that in this specific situation Obama has, up to when she said it anyway, benefitted from being black; that's now become a mixed-bag, and would become even more so if he's the nominee in the general election.
He has chosen to campaign not as a "black candidate" as the media and even the Clinton camp have tried to paint him as. Because he is not just black, he is a biracial American of both white and black heritage. So he does have a quite a bit of "all of us" in him because he is a product of both.
Neither the media nor the Clinton camp has tried to paint Obama as the black candidate. We all see his color, and the southern-esque-black accent he's adopted despite growing up in Hawaii and living his adult life in Chicago adds to it (just like we're reminded Oprah is black when she goes into ghetto-Oprah-speak), but he's done it much much more than the media or anybody in the Clinton campaign.
As to being biracial, we both know that that reads black in America. Probably a majority of "blacks" are mixed race by now. Still, if you look African-American, you're black. That's America even today. That's what white people see and process and that's part of what blacks resent (while at the same time maintaining a social order of light-skinned versus dark-skinned). Isn't it a shame that Barack Obama didn't address that?