wilehart1978
JUB Addict
Well some many feared John Ashcroft and his ultra conservative, religious views. Well, Roe v. Wade is still in tact. He was clear that he would uphold the Constitution regardless of his relgious convictions. He did just that. You are going to have politicians like Ashcorft who know the law and will uphold it regardless of their personal or religious convictions. Let's not forget, Jim McGreevy, NJ's gay governor, a devoted Catholic, voted against gay marriage legislation. 
 
Unfortunately, I'm not a huge fan of gay marriage either but I still support many other gay issues and causes such a civil unions and equal protection for both partners in that union -- just not necessarily marriage. Sorry, those are my religious convictions. Abortion is legal but again my religious convictions and upbringing tell me this act is wrong. I don't support the act, just a woman's right to choose. Thus, If there were a law allowing gay marriage, I don't think I'd approve morally, but would support it legally.
 
I have seen on the board where others feel that gay adoption may not be in the best interest of the child. As you can see gay freindly or not. Liberal or Conservative. Gay or Straight. We all have our convictions and opinions about family values. In the end, it's the laws that govern us, not religious convictions. Trust me -- really knowing where a candidate stands on issues that are a matter of conviction and not law, is good but should never be a dealbreaker for whom your vote is cast. I'm not saying their convictions should be ignored, but there are never hardly enough to sway my vote. This is just one issue in a myriad of other issues we should consider before voting for any candidate.
 
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			Unfortunately, I'm not a huge fan of gay marriage either but I still support many other gay issues and causes such a civil unions and equal protection for both partners in that union -- just not necessarily marriage. Sorry, those are my religious convictions. Abortion is legal but again my religious convictions and upbringing tell me this act is wrong. I don't support the act, just a woman's right to choose. Thus, If there were a law allowing gay marriage, I don't think I'd approve morally, but would support it legally.
I have seen on the board where others feel that gay adoption may not be in the best interest of the child. As you can see gay freindly or not. Liberal or Conservative. Gay or Straight. We all have our convictions and opinions about family values. In the end, it's the laws that govern us, not religious convictions. Trust me -- really knowing where a candidate stands on issues that are a matter of conviction and not law, is good but should never be a dealbreaker for whom your vote is cast. I'm not saying their convictions should be ignored, but there are never hardly enough to sway my vote. This is just one issue in a myriad of other issues we should consider before voting for any candidate.
I cant say this much, I don't trust anyone who says they support the gay community and then claim to have a very strong christian faith and follows the law of the bible and the word of god. It is a contradiction of terms, in which they say one thing and do another.


 
						 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		