SexyKev
Sex Symbol
She can't hold notes?
Exhibit A:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTSlKG2ZCq8[/ame]
Rihanna aint hitting and holding the notes Whitney holding here, homie. FACT.
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoTo register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Official 52nd Annual Grammy Awards Nomination Thread
- Thread starter miaedu
- Start date
She can't hold notes?
Exhibit A:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTSlKG2ZCq8[/ame]
Rihanna aint hitting and holding the notes Whitney holding here, homie. FACT.
Sgt Pepper
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Posts
- 4,145
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
Impossible. They never had any to begin with.
Don't you think he would have been singing a different tune if Ms. Houston would have been nominated for all those categories as predicted?
SexyKev
Sex Symbol
No she cant and her AMA "performance" proved it.
Whitney literally cant even hold simple notes anymore. It was very sad to watch her on stage.
Dont even let me bring up the Dancing With The Stars "performance"
The "Dancing With The Stars" performance is the same case as the "Good Morning America" performance. Her voice was gone. And what? Then she came back with performances like "I Look To You" live in Germany as in the video I just provided....and "Million Dollar Bill" live in italy with the white dress and black bow. Her voice is still there, but very inconsistent. Sometimes it's there, sometimes it's not. Still singing more than Britney/Rihanna.
SexyKev
Sex Symbol
lol....same can be said for any other typical stan on this forum. Your point? It's the stan's way. lol, frankly..
SexyKev
Sex Symbol
Just stating the obvious.
I'll take that as a YES then.
SexyKev
Sex Symbol
Voice is still there....
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9oIZhdcQjU[/ame]
Inconsistent, but there.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9oIZhdcQjU[/ame]
Inconsistent, but there.
SexyKev
Sex Symbol
SexyKev
Sex Symbol
SexyKev isn't that bad, I mean at least his adoration for Whitney stays inside Whitney related threads and he doesn't drag it everywhere like a certain Rihanna stan.
lol....awww. Thank you.
KTheLibra
Sex God
Silversun Pickups have been nominated for Best New Artist. I don't know what's more shocking, the fact that a band with talent has actually been nominated or the fact that it's one of my absolute favorite bands.
Sucks that they're just going to lose it to Lady Caca.
Sucks that they're just going to lose it to Lady Caca.
G-Lexington
Lex. Icon. Devil.
I'm stunned, actually.
...although my friends got another nomination. So, good for them.
Lex
...although my friends got another nomination. So, good for them.
Lex
Sgt Pepper
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Posts
- 4,145
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
I love Beyonce but Halo getting a Record of the Year nod instead of Single Ladies seems contrary to the year in pop music (also contrary to good taste). It may not be the Grammys fault though; I heard that B submitted Halo for Record consideration but NOT Single Ladies. Don't ask me why. Maybe she wants to keep Kanye firmly in his seat on Grammy night?
Very happy for Lady Gaga. She totally deserved it. And of this lineup, she'd be my pick for Album and Record of the Year. But she's a dance pop queen doing her best to keep Gay as the New Black and well...ask Madonna how well that worked out for her in the top categories. Even when she behaved, she got skunked by Lauryn Hill (the Grammys still prefer Black as the New Black).
I knew Taylor Swift would make Album, Record and Song of the Year -- it was the one lock I kept predicting -- but still....still...STILL it's hard to swallow. I hate that little twit. I think she has the bland talent of a Michelle Branch, only Swift gets WAY more credit for it. I hope she goes away in the next few years. My only consolation is that The Ingenue (especially if they skew tween) is usually beaten by The Legend in the top categories, so Taylor Swift should lose except...
...who in God's name is she going to lose to?? This might be the most difficult Album of the Year win to predict in recent memory! NONE of the Album of the Year contenders are really Living Legends and if you've forgotten or haven't noticed, I'll explain why this is relevant. In recent years I've beaten my friends in Grammy pools by spotting NARAS' tendency to turn the Album of the Year category into a Career Achievement Award, and cheekily then predicting Bob Dylan, Steely Dan, Ray Charles, U2, Herbie Hancock and Plant/Kraus while everyone else I knew gave me weird looks and insisted that Radiohead, Eminem, Kanye West, Kanye West again, Amy Winehouse and Coldplay would obviously win.
But this year the oldest act is Dave Matthews and...no...just NO! I refuse to think they might actually win by default. Dave Matthews is one of the most overrated bands of all time. Even in their prime they were overrated! They're the quintessential white guy's whitest white white rock band and their new album is not that good.
Barring that catastrophe, might we see an uncommonly good pick like Lady Gaga? Or does the lack of a more appropriate Old Fogey choice lead to the crowning of Beyonce (who has never won a Top 4 Grammy) in recognition of her amazingly potent pop culture status, her banner singles career, and the fact that she seems like someone who has earned it? The New Yorker music critic Sasha Frere Jones once lovingly called her "Pop's A student" for her clean image, especially at a time when most sultry pop singers are flashing their vaginas, getting caught snorting coke far too young (here's looking at you Amy!) and far too old (and you Whitney!), and generally behaving badly in various ways.
In other words, without a proper Geezer in the lineup, Beyonce represents an interesting compromise; she's definitely part of the Establishment now (so that sort of qualifies as Career Achievement, right?) but she's still very, very current. By hailing her, they can simultaneously satisfy their desire to crown an artist who's been here before, while still getting credit for being "hip" and "cool." Of course one could correctly point out that the Grammys idea of hip and cool is giving top awards to U2 for their career-late (and decidedly lesser) work, but even these lame voters have to realize that Dave Matthews is not U2 right? RIGHT? I'm counting on one, two, or all three of the following to steer voters in the right direction:
1. Beyonce's leading 10 nominations
2. John Mayer already has a bunch of Grammys, and he sorta counts as Dave Matthews
3. If they like it then they shoulda putta Grammy ring on it.
If only B's Album were...you know...actually deserving, then I could add a 4th, but let's be real, she's still a Singles Artist. But hey, that didn't stop Whitney from nabbing Album of the Year in 1993 did it? Am I actually comparing B to Whitney you say? (I can hear the queens...er, fans of over-the-top melisma crying foul already) Relax girls, B ain't Whitney. After all Whitney was totally fucking iced by the nominations today!
I'm still not ruling out the terrifying possibility that the nauseating over-abundance of Taylor Swift goodwill (from Kanyegate, natch) will lead to her winning. Let's not forget that NARAS (and America, double natch) finally catching on three years too late that the war in Iraq was bad, resulted in a desire to give Dubya (and Texas) the finger. Or three fingers actually, one for each Dixie Chick or one for each major award they won (Album, Record AND Song of the Year bitches!) depending on your abacus. Don't think for a moment the same show can't play again with Kanye West reprising the Dubya role (oh irony) -- the Grammys DO take place during Reruns after all.
God the possibility of Taylor Branch winning is too horrid. It's almost enough to make me root for Dave Matthews...
(Oh the Black Eyed Peas were also nominated? Yeah, exactly.)
Very happy for Lady Gaga. She totally deserved it. And of this lineup, she'd be my pick for Album and Record of the Year. But she's a dance pop queen doing her best to keep Gay as the New Black and well...ask Madonna how well that worked out for her in the top categories. Even when she behaved, she got skunked by Lauryn Hill (the Grammys still prefer Black as the New Black).
I knew Taylor Swift would make Album, Record and Song of the Year -- it was the one lock I kept predicting -- but still....still...STILL it's hard to swallow. I hate that little twit. I think she has the bland talent of a Michelle Branch, only Swift gets WAY more credit for it. I hope she goes away in the next few years. My only consolation is that The Ingenue (especially if they skew tween) is usually beaten by The Legend in the top categories, so Taylor Swift should lose except...
...who in God's name is she going to lose to?? This might be the most difficult Album of the Year win to predict in recent memory! NONE of the Album of the Year contenders are really Living Legends and if you've forgotten or haven't noticed, I'll explain why this is relevant. In recent years I've beaten my friends in Grammy pools by spotting NARAS' tendency to turn the Album of the Year category into a Career Achievement Award, and cheekily then predicting Bob Dylan, Steely Dan, Ray Charles, U2, Herbie Hancock and Plant/Kraus while everyone else I knew gave me weird looks and insisted that Radiohead, Eminem, Kanye West, Kanye West again, Amy Winehouse and Coldplay would obviously win.
But this year the oldest act is Dave Matthews and...no...just NO! I refuse to think they might actually win by default. Dave Matthews is one of the most overrated bands of all time. Even in their prime they were overrated! They're the quintessential white guy's whitest white white rock band and their new album is not that good.
Barring that catastrophe, might we see an uncommonly good pick like Lady Gaga? Or does the lack of a more appropriate Old Fogey choice lead to the crowning of Beyonce (who has never won a Top 4 Grammy) in recognition of her amazingly potent pop culture status, her banner singles career, and the fact that she seems like someone who has earned it? The New Yorker music critic Sasha Frere Jones once lovingly called her "Pop's A student" for her clean image, especially at a time when most sultry pop singers are flashing their vaginas, getting caught snorting coke far too young (here's looking at you Amy!) and far too old (and you Whitney!), and generally behaving badly in various ways.
In other words, without a proper Geezer in the lineup, Beyonce represents an interesting compromise; she's definitely part of the Establishment now (so that sort of qualifies as Career Achievement, right?) but she's still very, very current. By hailing her, they can simultaneously satisfy their desire to crown an artist who's been here before, while still getting credit for being "hip" and "cool." Of course one could correctly point out that the Grammys idea of hip and cool is giving top awards to U2 for their career-late (and decidedly lesser) work, but even these lame voters have to realize that Dave Matthews is not U2 right? RIGHT? I'm counting on one, two, or all three of the following to steer voters in the right direction:
1. Beyonce's leading 10 nominations
2. John Mayer already has a bunch of Grammys, and he sorta counts as Dave Matthews
3. If they like it then they shoulda putta Grammy ring on it.
If only B's Album were...you know...actually deserving, then I could add a 4th, but let's be real, she's still a Singles Artist. But hey, that didn't stop Whitney from nabbing Album of the Year in 1993 did it? Am I actually comparing B to Whitney you say? (I can hear the queens...er, fans of over-the-top melisma crying foul already) Relax girls, B ain't Whitney. After all Whitney was totally fucking iced by the nominations today!
I'm still not ruling out the terrifying possibility that the nauseating over-abundance of Taylor Swift goodwill (from Kanyegate, natch) will lead to her winning. Let's not forget that NARAS (and America, double natch) finally catching on three years too late that the war in Iraq was bad, resulted in a desire to give Dubya (and Texas) the finger. Or three fingers actually, one for each Dixie Chick or one for each major award they won (Album, Record AND Song of the Year bitches!) depending on your abacus. Don't think for a moment the same show can't play again with Kanye West reprising the Dubya role (oh irony) -- the Grammys DO take place during Reruns after all.
God the possibility of Taylor Branch winning is too horrid. It's almost enough to make me root for Dave Matthews...
(Oh the Black Eyed Peas were also nominated? Yeah, exactly.)
You think YOU'RE stunned? Taurean79 is on suicide watch.
G-Lexington
Lex. Icon. Devil.
>>>But this year the oldest act is Dave Matthews and...no...just NO! I refuse to think they might actually win by default. Dave Matthews is one of the most overrated bands of all time. Even in their prime they were overrated! They're the quintessential white guy's whitest white white rock band and their new album is not that good.
It's an album by an established artist in tribute to a deceased former band member. That might nudge them into the winner's cirle.
Lex
It's an album by an established artist in tribute to a deceased former band member. That might nudge them into the winner's cirle.
Lex
SexyKev
Sex Symbol
LMFAO. That was funny. I aint seen him post since the show lol. Awwww he must be taking it hard. I couldn't care less. I was pissed at first but Im over it. GRAMMYS SUCK!
