The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Oh why oh why?

G-Lexington

G-Lexington

Lex. Icon. Devil.
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
47,299
Reaction score
36
Points
48
Location
Denver CO
Rule one of remakes, be it movies or music: "If the public bought it once, they'll probably buy it again." Thus, everything that's successful once gets remade.

Lex
 
G-Lexington said:
Rule one of remakes, be it movies or music: "If the public bought it once, they'll probably buy it again." Thus, everything that's successful once gets remade.

Lex
Click to expand...

Yes, and what a shame. Once in a while the remake is better, but only once in a while.
 
^^ That is the most redundant production in all of Hollywood. #-o
 
NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!They wanna remake the The Thing!!The 1981 John Carpenter version was a box office bomb but, became a cult classic in a short time after its release...some of the best special effects for its time before all this CGI...
 
But I thought that the 1981 version was already remake of the 1951 film 'The Thing from Another World'? :confused:
 
*Hoody* said:
But I thought that the 1981 version was already remake of the 1951 film 'The Thing from Another World'? :confused:
Click to expand...
The 1981 movie had very little resemblance to the 1951 movie other than the words "The Thing" in the title. Carpenter's movie technically was a reimaging and not a remake. The story's told in both movies are very different. Carpenter's was by far the better movie.
 
Yes.Last House on the left is Wes Cravens 1st film.kinda disturbing movie
 
Because they're douchebags thats why. Horror movie remakes always suck. Though, Texas Chainsaw Massacre was pretty scary...
 
Carpenter's "Thing" may have been the superior movie, but it didn't have James Arness in it.
 
RomanHeartfan said:
I am sorry. Who is that?
Click to expand...

You're probably too young. He starred in 'Gunsmoke' on television from 1955 to 1975. His movie debut (unrecognisable) was as the alien in the original movie 'The Thing'. He's Peter Grave's brother.

Here he is as Marshal Matt Dillon on Gunsmoke:

attachment.php
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top