Old Man wants to fuck me with his 9-inch dick....!!!

[MarkDW]

You haven't had anal before, but you like being a bottom as much as a top. Which is it? If it is your first time, go with the smaller of the two, and lots and lots of lube, and go real real slow. YOU control the insertion, i.e., u be on top, him on his back, and u slide down on top of his dick, slow and easy. If you take your time, it can be a great experience.

 

[sixthson]

You should avoid both of these guys for one reason: they are pressuring you for unprotected sex. Don't be a fool. Never take someone's word for being "clean".

 

[jaysizzles]

You should avoid both of these guys for one reason: they are pressuring you for unprotected sex. Don't be a fool. Never take someone's word for being "clean".

Agreed!

Do not have unprotected sex with them, or anyone that you are not 100% certain that they are clean! I wouldn't trust these guys now either if they said that they'd use a condom...they're likely the type to pull it off during sex, and take advantage of you. Any guy that puts pressure on you should be an automatic red flag...likely only interested in taking your virginity unprotected, and have no regard for you or your well being.

Regarding the other part of your question tho, an experienced top should be able to gradually work your hole with lubed fingers and get you to relax in order to take his cock...may take a few attempts and a lot of patience on his and your part, especially if he is larger. Some guys just stay away from anything too big altogether. You may want to start with someone/something smaller and work your way up.

 

[Str8Top14701]

Unless they show up with papers dated yesterday, don't do bb, especially since they're uncut!

 

[palemale]

Hi thanks for your post...
Yeh I know Kay(54y) is pressuring me a lot as he want to make me his cream pie and want to see his cum dripping out of my hole as I walk around his place naked and this is not possible with protected sex.
He told me about his interests on very first day. As we are planning for that event I told him that I prefer safe sex.
Last night he sent me his latest medical done with all -ve test reports to make me sure of his cleanness.
What can I do now, should I give up?
Rob

54 is not old, but it's old enough to know better. Avoid them both. Find a guy who will fuck you safely. Condoms sometimes break. Most guys are going to insist on using condoms, and most aren't going to fuck around with a guy that has unsafe sex.

 

[HornyHenry]

If you're a virgin you had best start with a small dick, preferably a thin five-incher the first few times and then gradually progress with larger and larger ones until you work your way up to the nine or ten inches. Starting with a big dick like the nine-inch stud's will most likely rip your ass open and you'd need it sewn up. Also, always use protection and water-based lubes.

 

[deksman2]

Unless they show up with papers dated yesterday, don't do bb, especially since they're uncut!

Being 'uncut' has nothing to do with one being healthy or not in terms of potential STD infections.

 

[palemale]

If you're a virgin you had best start with a small dick, preferably a thin five-incher the first few times and then gradually progress with larger and larger ones until you work your way up to the nine or ten inches. Starting with a big dick like the nine-inch stud's will most likely rip your ass open and you'd need it sewn up. Also, always use protection and water-based lubes.

Nonsense. My first time was with a guy with 9". It was great, I was fine, no blood, no pain afterward. Just find a guy who will rim the hell out of you.

 

[Storybook_Man]

First time that I had anal, the guy was about 6-7" average width, I got lucky lol. But as life went on I had bigger ones. One that was last week, he fucked me with his 9x4 lol. Im surprised it went in so easy (well first entry didn't work, took a couple times), then again I can also deep throat him so its not too much of a surprise.

Honestly though, if you are going for your first time, dominant men shouldn't be your thing. They sometimes rush it and don't lube correctly. If I were you, try and sit on it before you have the guy get you from behind.

 

[blaqpllw]

lot, and lots of lube

 

[SexyGuy]

Being 'uncut' has nothing to do with one being healthy or not in terms of potential STD infections.

Uhm... correction: it's been shown that those that are uncut are more likely to contract HIV and other STIs: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1127372/

To the OP: Don't do it. Your health is much more important than these guys getting their rocks off, even if they are clean. Find someone who will have sex with you with a condom and don't take no for an answer.

 

[Babar]

Robbeck, Please do not put your trust in a piece of paper which allegedly reflects a negative result. Test results can be wrong, data may be manipulated but most importantly, there is a window of time where one may test negative but in fact be positive. Do not "prefer" to have safer sex, INSIST upon it. Certainly, these men who should know better should not be asking you to bareback. Avoid them. They are not your friends and DO NOT have your best interests in mind. You have one healthy life. Try to keep it as such. Good luck.

 

[Str8Top14701]

Being 'uncut' has nothing to do with one being healthy or not in terms of potential STD infections.

While a person can be uncut and healthy, you're wrong about the STD part of your statement. Look at the latest WHO recommendations about HIV. Foreskins provide and environment that STD's harbor and thrive in, HIV included. Circumcision drastically reduced HIV infection rates on the African continent.

Some years ago, one study showed that the foreskin produces a compound (much like it can produce smegma) that "attracts the HIV virus like a magnet."

Even within the straight world, women who have uncut partners suffer from higher rates of infections, cervical cancer, and STDs.

Get educated.

 

[Str8Top14701]

The part that should bother you is the pressure that's being applied. There's a reason you're hesitant to do that with them, and you should pay attention to that. Call it intuition, or a gut feeling, or whatever you want, the fact is it's there. To quote Sam Kinison: "If you don't trust the pussy, don't fuck the pussy!" Insert "cock" for "pussy" and there you go.

 

[deksman2]

While a person can be uncut and healthy, you're wrong about the STD part of your statement. Look at the latest WHO recommendations about HIV. Foreskins provide and environment that STD's harbor and thrive in, HIV included. Circumcision drastically reduced HIV infection rates on the African continent.

Some years ago, one study showed that the foreskin produces a compound (much like it can produce smegma) that "attracts the HIV virus like a magnet."

Even within the straight world, women who have uncut partners suffer from higher rates of infections, cervical cancer, and STDs.

Get educated.

I try to get exposed to relevant education on a regular basis... and there were/are several studies more comprehensive than the ones posted here showing otherwise.

http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/CR22/CR22.pdf

http://www.info.gov.za/issues/hiv/survey_2009.htm

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60998-3/abstract

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23358857/


Either way, I'm rather skeptical on the premise that circumcision lowers HIV infection in any significant manner.
This rather... obsolete practice also alters the eco-system that's part of regular functions (especially seeing how we have a comprehensive set of bacteria making up the Human body and its parts that are in a certain balance).