PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Silverman's point in the video wasn't to get rid of houses of worship. Only to sell filthy excess to feed the starving. The Vatican is a good place to start.In that case, then, the same can then be said for all the churches around the world, including yours, Mariatenebre. Now that should knock out Poverty!
Oh the point I don't think was to necessarily eradicate poverty. It's more of an issue of principle. Jesus walking around in sandals no doubt while the Pope roams around a palace in his house that is a city. If the Church has sold its property before and like you said the physical buildings and institutions are not so much the Church, then let's get rid of these excesses and direct the wealth to those who need feeding.The Vatican Has sold property in the past. But, Jesus had said that the poor we will always have amongst us. What if all the church property was sold to house and feed the poor, and then the poor keeps popping out of the woodwork; what then? Will you personally help out? After all, the people of God are the Church, not so much the physical buildings and institutions. BTW, my hearing aid is out, so, I can't hear the Video.
I also don't recall Jesus saying in scripture that the passage of "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God" doesn't apply to those who store riches for religious purposes.You may have forgotten that for most of history, that it was the poor who buiilt these beautiful places of Worship, and they have taken pride in the work they did.
Did Jesus tell the authorities of the Temple of his day to sell off their property to feed the masses of the poor? Its most certainly not in scripture, but what is in scripture is the fact that Jesus recognised the Earthly Temple (physical building) as his Father's house, and he even prayed in the temple, drove out the money changers in the temple, because they were turning His Father's house into a den of thieves.
Excerpt of Lateran Treaty of 1929:1st off, The Pope and all the others in the Vatican doesn't own the Property, it isn't theirs to do as they wish! The Vatican is a city-state. The Vatican is very much involved with the plight of the poor and the destitutes. The Vatican nearly went bankcrupt a few times this past century, ie before 2000. Tell me, Who owns the Vatican??? Who has the sole right to sell the property, etc?
In that case, then, the same can then be said for all the churches around the world, including yours, Mariatenebre. Now that should knock out Poverty!
Very true although I was trying to see if I could get him to sympathize with the idea of ridding excesses for the benefit of the less fortunate and the fact that he's been so forcefully opposed to it from the getgo is quite telling.I don't have a church and I worship at home on my own alter. The best we have is a Church in Oregon and one in South Africa. Next you are taking this topic way to seriously it is a joke. No one is seriously considering selling the Vatican, this video is made as a joke and not meant to be taken seriously.
Very true although I was trying to see if I could get him to sympathize with the idea of ridding excesses for the benefit of the less fortunate and the fact that he's been so forcefully opposed to it from the getgo is quite telling.
What happened to Pumpkin?
1st off, The Pope and all the others in the Vatican doesn't own the Property, it isn't theirs to do as they wish! The Vatican is a city-state. The Vatican is very much involved with the plight of the poor and the destitutes. The Vatican nearly went bankcrupt a few times this past century, ie before 2000. Tell me, Who owns the Vatican??? Who has the sole right to sell the property, etc?
Now, tell me who owns the Holy See? Who are the Holy See?
Wikipedia said:The Holy See is the episcopal jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome, commonly known as the Pope, and is the preeminent episcopal see of the Catholic Church, forming the central government of the Church. As such, diplomatically, and in other spheres the Holy See acts and speaks for the whole Catholic Church. It is also recognized by other subjects of international law as a sovereign entity, headed by the Pope, with which diplomatic relations can be maintained.[1]
The Holy See is not the same as the Vatican City State, which came into existence only in 1929, while the Holy See dates back to early Christian times. Ambassadors are officially accredited not to the Vatican City State but to "the Holy See", and papal representatives to states and international organizations are recognized as representing the Holy See, not the Vatican City State.
While all episcopal sees are "holy", the expression "the Holy See" (without further specification) is normally used in international relations, as a metonym, (as well as in the canon law of the Catholic Church)[2] to refer to the See of Rome viewed as the central government of the Catholic Church.
Wikipedia said:Vatican City is an ecclesiastical or sacerdotal-monarchical state, ruled by the bishop of Rome—the Pope. The highest state functionaries are all Catholic clergymen of various racial, ethnic and national backgrounds. It is the sovereign territory of the Holy See (Sancta Sedes) and the location of the Pope's residence, referred to as the Apostolic Palace.
I'm afraid that will only fall on deaf ears.
The problem of world-hunger is mostly a problem of malnutrition and balefully inadequate government.
For example, neither Ethiopia nor Egypt are countries that cannot be farmed. In Ethiopia famines exist because the farmers volunteer for war instead. In Egypt what arable land there is, is used for residential building. Most western nations would tolerate such a threat to common welfare.
Giving away money does not help. It never has.
I believe Jesus would be all for selling the Vatican and all the church's properties. Look at the history of the "Holy" Roman Church. How many millions, maybe billions did they kill in the name of Jesus. QUOTE]
Utter rot, the catholic church never killed either millions or billions of people.
AS for selling it, do you also think the English church should sell its cathedrals, the evangelical church sell its crystal cathedral, and so on? This is undisguised bigotry.
Even though I can't stomach looking at, listening to, reading about or even thinking about Sarah Silverman in any way, shape, or form and think she has no value whatsoever, not even as a speed bump, I do like this idea of selling off the Vatican (and I'm a recovered Catholic myself). My sister was at the Vatican in October and described it as an "enchanted forest of marble."
I believe Jesus would be all for selling the Vatican and all the church's properties. Look at the history of the "Holy" Roman Church. How many millions, maybe billions did they kill in the name of Jesus. QUOTE]
Utter rot, the catholic church never killed either millions or billions of people.
AS for selling it, do you also think the English church should sell its cathedrals, the evangelical church sell its crystal cathedral, and so on? This is undisguised bigotry.
Since Pumpkin is no longer with us and I knew him somewhat, I'll answer on his behalf.
Okay, it probably wasn't billions. Maybe it wasn't millions, either. But they used their authority like they were an empire, and had people burned at the stake in the name of Jesus.
And yes -- if the Vatican is to be sold, so should all those other gaudy monuments to wealth.








