BostonPirate
Ijubbinatti
The President doesn't amend the Constitution.
on a side note...lol
I love the pineapple express.
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
POLL: Nevada's Senate race outcome?
- Thread starter CoolBlue71
- Start date
on a side note...lol
I love the pineapple express.
MercuryJones
Messenger of the Gods
Probably laikaNYC believes marriage is a basic civil right... but there's no case for it... but it should go to the SCOTUS... except it shouldn't go to the SCOTUS... because until after the court rules there is no case.... but then there's a law.... but the court doesn't create laws... so there's no case... but it should go to the court in a lawsuit... but....
LOL! You just argued for what you were arguing against.
You're hopelessly confused man.
laikaNYC
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2010
- Posts
- 2,449
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
MercuryJones
Messenger of the Gods
^
Not only that, but laikaNY also said the Equal Protection Clause didn't apply and couldn't apply to Prop8 -- but then cites Loving v Virginia which was decided on the Equal Protection Clause and says "it was argued in court that they had a basic civil right to do so. Which is what we need to do."
Not only that, but laikaNY also said the Equal Protection Clause didn't apply and couldn't apply to Prop8 -- but then cites Loving v Virginia which was decided on the Equal Protection Clause and says "it was argued in court that they had a basic civil right to do so. Which is what we need to do."
You're confusing yourself!
No man, you're the one who's confused.
You said the prop8 suit was not valid and should not go forward, then you articulated a position of support for a suit on the same issue that the SCOTUS would decide, which precisely describes the prop8 suit. LOL!