What he may have meant is that he would use that fake challenge to whitewash his gay-for-pay past: you know, old cheap gay videos and that crap.
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Post something just for the heck of it
- Thread starter belamyi
- Start date
- Featured
What he may have meant is that he would use that fake challenge to whitewash his gay-for-pay past: you know, old cheap gay videos and that crap.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2009
- Posts
- 121,262
- Reaction score
- 185,282
- Points
- 113
Yeah it was him. Male-Only March he called it.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...-apologizes-go-gay-comments-glaad/2565285002/
^ If you can 'go straight', why is it in poorer taste to go gay in "The Free World"... it's like saying that you can't revel, you can't eat, drink and spend irresponsibly while there are so many starving and pennyless people in the world 
THAT hypocritical righteousness IS disgusting and blablabla.
As for the suicide video, that a person who decided to sent you, me and the whole world to hell only to be the subject of a social moral uproar, is the biggest source of reproach I can find to the whole affair: those silly kids' reaction do not appear any more repulsive and insensitive than the "thoughts and prayers" crap that is usually spewed in other sort of distressing situations and, at least, the reactions are more honest than when moral and proper demeanor is stage beforehand.
FOR FUCK'S SAKE, we run a thread on people dying this or that year, and the only person who took seriously and found shocking our fun-poking was ignored... now are we any less disgusting and insensitive?
All our bloody "news" filled up with "stories" about this or that murder, included as such only for its shock value, because you didn't give a crap about the killed before the killing, nor will be anymore after the "story" running as "news" of the day is over... all that "entertainment" industry based on murders solved by nice elderly women, gore massacres and scary situations just for the sake of "having fun" because, you know, it's not the same to search fun in being scared by a senseless massacre in a Hollywood production, than whatever may happen when terrorists decide they have nothing better to do ... all that would mean our society is base, sick and insensitive, according to that standard... but healthier, anyway, than the terrorists code...
THAT hypocritical righteousness IS disgusting and blablabla.
As for the suicide video, that a person who decided to sent you, me and the whole world to hell only to be the subject of a social moral uproar, is the biggest source of reproach I can find to the whole affair: those silly kids' reaction do not appear any more repulsive and insensitive than the "thoughts and prayers" crap that is usually spewed in other sort of distressing situations and, at least, the reactions are more honest than when moral and proper demeanor is stage beforehand.
FOR FUCK'S SAKE, we run a thread on people dying this or that year, and the only person who took seriously and found shocking our fun-poking was ignored... now are we any less disgusting and insensitive?
All our bloody "news" filled up with "stories" about this or that murder, included as such only for its shock value, because you didn't give a crap about the killed before the killing, nor will be anymore after the "story" running as "news" of the day is over... all that "entertainment" industry based on murders solved by nice elderly women, gore massacres and scary situations just for the sake of "having fun" because, you know, it's not the same to search fun in being scared by a senseless massacre in a Hollywood production, than whatever may happen when terrorists decide they have nothing better to do ... all that would mean our society is base, sick and insensitive, according to that standard... but healthier, anyway, than the terrorists code...
EDITED VERSION OF MY JEREMIAD: ^ If you can 'go straight', why is it in poorer taste to go gay in "The Free World"... it's like saying that you can't revel, you can't eat, drink and spend irresponsibly while there are so many starving and penniless people in the world
THAT hypocritical righteousness IS disgusting and whatever adjectives you want throw to it.
As for the suicide video, that a person who decided to sent you, me and the whole world to hell only elicited social moral uproar against a bunch of spoilt brats, is the biggest source of reproach I can find to the whole affair: those silly kids' reaction does not appear any more repulsive and insensitive than the "thoughts and prayers" crap that is usually spewed in other sort of distressing situations and, at least, their reactions are more honest than when moral and proper demeanor is staged beforehand.
FOR FUCK'S SAKE, on this site we run threads on people dying this or that year, and the only member who took seriously and found shocking our fun-poking was ignored... now are we any less disgusting and insensitive?
All our bloody "news" are filled up with "stories" about this or that murder, included as such only for their shock value, because you didn't give a crap about the killed before the killing, nor will do anymore after the "story" running as "news" of the day is over... all that "entertainment" industry based on murders solved by nice elderly women, gory massacres and scary situations just for the sake of "having fun" because, you know, it's not the same to search fun in being scared by a senseless massacre in a Hollywood production, than whatever may happen when terrorists decide they have nothing better to do ... all that would mean our society is base, sick and insensitive, according to that standard... but healthier, anyway, than the terrorists code... right...
THAT hypocritical righteousness IS disgusting and whatever adjectives you want throw to it.
As for the suicide video, that a person who decided to sent you, me and the whole world to hell only elicited social moral uproar against a bunch of spoilt brats, is the biggest source of reproach I can find to the whole affair: those silly kids' reaction does not appear any more repulsive and insensitive than the "thoughts and prayers" crap that is usually spewed in other sort of distressing situations and, at least, their reactions are more honest than when moral and proper demeanor is staged beforehand.
FOR FUCK'S SAKE, on this site we run threads on people dying this or that year, and the only member who took seriously and found shocking our fun-poking was ignored... now are we any less disgusting and insensitive?
All our bloody "news" are filled up with "stories" about this or that murder, included as such only for their shock value, because you didn't give a crap about the killed before the killing, nor will do anymore after the "story" running as "news" of the day is over... all that "entertainment" industry based on murders solved by nice elderly women, gory massacres and scary situations just for the sake of "having fun" because, you know, it's not the same to search fun in being scared by a senseless massacre in a Hollywood production, than whatever may happen when terrorists decide they have nothing better to do ... all that would mean our society is base, sick and insensitive, according to that standard... but healthier, anyway, than the terrorists code... right...
No one would expect less from the people: if people kept in silent dignity, respecting the collective failure that every single suicide means, no videos like that would be published, and no fame would be gained with such means, because the business trap lies in morally, righteously, hipocritically falling for it.
The biggest scandal in all scandals is social indignation being ultimately more important than the subject of indignation.
Making money out of it does not reach the level or moral debasement of that social righteous indignation, and old, traditional, religious prudishness is not worse, nor better than the current sort.
When Byron would spread concocted rumours about himself, he was doing for fun, on a traditionally prudish society, what entertainment business (news included, which are hardly journalism, if at all: those who try to raise money to make real, informative journalism know that very well) is doing today for money on an equally prudish society, with different buttons to push and switch.
I remember, back in the days of the Arab Spring Grand Guignol, finding myself in a Punch & Judy show with some Canadian journalist who would believe that my jabs at that news entertainment industry was a nasty attack at the holy profession of journalism that he believed he was serving by being a professional in that Boulevard du Shock: he couldn't conceive my pointing out that reporters being sent to a revolution to report live, in the middle of a throbbing mob, only to be raped, was a sign of the stupid conception of the role of the reporter in that entertainment scheme... he would take those reporters for heroes, heroines or innocent victims, while the plain fact, truth, or whatever you want to label it is, in a situation like that, you can not mask that "job" with the sort of professional and holy "objective detachment" that you can more physically, (but not "morally") safe blandish when you decide you'd rather take a pic of a starving kid, or record a massacre, than get personally involved in it... as you would find yourself if you throw yourself into a revolutionary mob.
I remember, back in the days of the Arab Spring Grand Guignol, finding myself in a Punch & Judy show with some Canadian journalist who would believe that my jabs at that news entertainment industry was a nasty attack at the holy profession of journalism that he believed he was serving by being a professional in that Boulevard du Shock: he couldn't conceive my pointing out that reporters being sent to a revolution to report live, in the middle of a throbbing mob, only to be raped, was a sign of the stupid conception of the role of the reporter in that entertainment scheme... he would take those reporters for heroes, heroines or innocent victims, while the plain fact, truth, or whatever you want to label it is, in a situation like that, you can not mask that "job" with the sort of professional and holy "objective detachment" that you can more physically, (but not "morally") safe blandish when you decide you'd rather take a pic of a starving kid, or record a massacre, than get personally involved in it... as you would find yourself if you throw yourself into a revolutionary mob.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Posts
- 23,953
- Reaction score
- 72
- Points
- 48
The sight of that millionaire lounge lizard on the edge of being raped was salutary
[video]https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=anderson+cooper+egypt+rape&pc=cosp&ptag=G6C999N18495AA37F7FBE93&conlogo=CT3210127&ru=%2fsearch%3fq%3danderson%2520cooper%2520egypt%2 520rape%26pc%3dcosp%26ptag%3dG6C999N18495AA37F7FBE 93%26form%3dCONBDF%26conlogo%3dCT3210127&view=detail&mmscn=vwrc&mid=DF1B80C0CA9079C398CADF1B80C0CA9079C398CA&FORM=WRVORC[/video]
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Posts
- 23,953
- Reaction score
- 72
- Points
- 48
Those TV journalists are repellant. Rich people behaving like tourists amongst the savages.
J
johaninsc
Guest
the list of actors for the New DUNE remake...so far
Timothée Chalamet ... Paul Atreides
Rebecca Ferguson ... Lady Jessica
Zendaya ... Chani (rumored)
Josh Brolin ... Gurney Halleck
Charlotte Rampling ... Reverend Mother Mohiam
Javier Bardem ... Stilgar
Oscar Isaac ... Duke Atreides
Dave Bautista ... Glossu 'Beast' Rabban
Stellan Skarsgård .. . Baron Harkonnen
Jason Momoa ... Duncan Idaho
no word yet on who will play the parts of the emperor and Feyd
Timothée Chalamet ... Paul Atreides
Rebecca Ferguson ... Lady Jessica
Zendaya ... Chani (rumored)
Josh Brolin ... Gurney Halleck
Charlotte Rampling ... Reverend Mother Mohiam
Javier Bardem ... Stilgar
Oscar Isaac ... Duke Atreides
Dave Bautista ... Glossu 'Beast' Rabban
Stellan Skarsgård .. . Baron Harkonnen
Jason Momoa ... Duncan Idaho
no word yet on who will play the parts of the emperor and Feyd
Since it is gonig to be deleted on YT...
Why doesn't Tom upgrade his own look... his attire is unbearable after the third clip: not "classy", nor "professional" and "neutral" enough to justify his choice. One can ignore that his eyes look so funny, be it from birth, or after the surgery that had sexual intercourse with them, but not the lack of true sense of style in someone who gives lessons on it.
A nobody can choose to wear the exact same attire, but some designer who had a big breakthrough with the revamping of a dead and rotten brand back in 1995, can't expect to be taken seriously if he insists on acting as another Anna Wintour, who holds (still!) the position of high priestess of style, while wearing the exact same wig for everything she puts on her skinny flaccid body, and accesorizing with the same silly crushed-candy necklaces around her flabby neck for over a decade.
Why doesn't Tom upgrade his own look... his attire is unbearable after the third clip: not "classy", nor "professional" and "neutral" enough to justify his choice. One can ignore that his eyes look so funny, be it from birth, or after the surgery that had sexual intercourse with them, but not the lack of true sense of style in someone who gives lessons on it.
A nobody can choose to wear the exact same attire, but some designer who had a big breakthrough with the revamping of a dead and rotten brand back in 1995, can't expect to be taken seriously if he insists on acting as another Anna Wintour, who holds (still!) the position of high priestess of style, while wearing the exact same wig for everything she puts on her skinny flaccid body, and accesorizing with the same silly crushed-candy necklaces around her flabby neck for over a decade.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2009
- Posts
- 121,262
- Reaction score
- 185,282
- Points
- 113
Don't think so much into it
Just like I never read as much as you do into the escort profiles that I post: I link to them only because I found some particular funny pic or data in it, but you always pin up the slightest stat and stat incoherence that you can find in them
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2009
- Posts
- 121,262
- Reaction score
- 185,282
- Points
- 113
Just like I never read as much as you do into the escort profiles that I post: I link to them only because I found some particular funny pic or data in it, but you always pin up the slightest stat and stat incoherence that you can find in them
Totally 2 different things.
