The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Post something just for the heck of it
- Thread starter belamyi
- Start date
- Featured
^ Did I say he was humpable at all: I commented he had humpable qualities, but they are all like truffles in a bed of fresh diarrhoeic shit.
To [STRIKE]Philistines[/STRIKE] Judahites like you the truffles are shit themselves already
- - - Updated - - -
Now don't tell me I included some "improper" or even "unacceptable" reference in that comment
To [STRIKE]Philistines[/STRIKE] Judahites like you the truffles are shit themselves already
- - - Updated - - -
Now don't tell me I included some "improper" or even "unacceptable" reference in that comment
They did it again
That is why I said "literally". But you forget that, according to that archaic, male chauvinist set of mind, it's the men who do the "lying with", and females (women) "are laid". Unless they are Lilith-like devils LOL
In any case, if it were truly specifically meant "boys", they would not have used the general "masculine"... because that would imply, folliwing your own logic, that it would be implied that it was ok to lie with little girls or, at least, pubescent girls, as it was actually the case.
Do not sweat it, that part of the Bible is not about high morals as much as about whims who might have had some sense back in the place and era, like eating pork or circumcising, and got derailed when dealing with whatever "wasted" seminal material for procreation: that sort of morals are about the most materialistic aspects of life, they have nothing to do with good or evil morals on a higher, spiritual, god-related level.
- - - Updated - - -
They did it again
That is why I said "literally". But you forget that, according to that archaic, male chauvinist set of mind, it's the men who do the "lying with", and females (women) "are laid". Unless they are Lilith-like devils LOL
In any case, if it were truly specifically meant "boys", they would not have used the general "masculine"... because that would imply, folliwing your own logic, that it would be implied that it was ok to lie with little girls or, at least, pubescent girls, as it was actually the case.
Do not sweat it, that part of the Bible is not about high morals as much as about whims who might have had some sense back in the place and era, like eating pork or circumcising, and got derailed when dealing with whatever "wasted" seminal material for procreation: that sort of morals are about the most materialistic aspects of life, they have nothing to do with good or evil morals on a higher, spiritual, god-related level.
That is why I said "literally". But you forget that, according to that archaic, male chauvinist set of mind, it's the men who do the "lying with", and females (women) "are laid". Unless they are Lilith-like devils LOL
In any case, if it were truly specifically meant "boys", they would not have used the general "masculine"... because that would imply, folliwing your own logic, that it would be implied that it was ok to lie with little girls or, at least, pubescent girls, as it was actually the case.
Do not sweat it, that part of the Bible is not about high morals as much as about whims who might have had some sense back in the place and era, like eating pork or circumcising, and got derailed when dealing with whatever "wasted" seminal material for procreation: that sort of morals are about the most materialistic aspects of life, they have nothing to do with good or evil morals on a higher, spiritual, god-related level.
- - - Updated - - -
They did it again
That is why I said "literally". But you forget that, according to that archaic, male chauvinist set of mind, it's the men who do the "lying with", and females (women) "are laid". Unless they are Lilith-like devils LOL
In any case, if it were truly specifically meant "boys", they would not have used the general "masculine"... because that would imply, folliwing your own logic, that it would be implied that it was ok to lie with little girls or, at least, pubescent girls, as it was actually the case.
Do not sweat it, that part of the Bible is not about high morals as much as about whims who might have had some sense back in the place and era, like eating pork or circumcising, and got derailed when dealing with whatever "wasted" seminal material for procreation: that sort of morals are about the most materialistic aspects of life, they have nothing to do with good or evil morals on a higher, spiritual, god-related level.
You forget that, in the archaic set of mind, the point is not about gender, but about active vs passive, and the male was assumed to carry the active part, so a woman could not possible "lie with", in the active voice. In any case, "arsen-/arren-" does remit to male, to gender, not to age.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 122,937
- Reaction score
- 4,432
- Points
- 113
The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.
-- Werner Heisenberg
-- Werner Heisenberg
In the church? lol
ChristianGianni
Time after some time you'll picture me ...
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
- Posts
- 22,238
- Reaction score
- 120
- Points
- 63
I first heard this album at a pot party in Cleveland in the mid-1970s and it didn't impress me much.
I guess I just wasn't ready. It came up early this year one night when I decided to explore some Velvet Underground stuff...and I loved the album now!
It's kind of the approach I take to life, in general. A good example is yesterday when I just started talking to a total stranger at the UPS Store in Chicago, a black middle-aged woman (i. e. we're not much alike), and we just kept talking about stuff for about 40 minutes. Neither of us were in a hurry.
Good find! Somebody certainly was on the ball.
Lo que le ocurre a usted es que no sabe leer, y no esperará que yo adivine a qué comentario se refiere usted cuando me critica por algo que ni escribí, ni menos aún pretendí nunca decir: que ahí quedan escritos todos los comentarios de todo el mundo para quien pudiere "olvidarlos" y, sobre todo, para quien SEPA LEERLOS.
Le pongo mi comentario entero, no el que usted parece haber recortado a la medida de su propia inteligencia, como "los de parvulitos" que están aprendiendo a leer:
"Eso, tú distingue un saco de sal de otro porque uno lleva la etiqueta "azúcar" jaja. El comunismo es lo de siempre con otra gente y bajo otro nombre, y punto."
Si no hubiera recortado usted esa segunda parte, tal vez le habría quedado más claro que hablaba de los que quieren hacer pasar la sal del viejo fascismo bajo una etiqueta nueva de "azúcar". Si ya está usted sudando para entender la literalidad, le explico lo que quiere decir la metáfora: los neofascistas intentan blanquearse llamando "fascistas" a los demás, y proclamándose a sí mismos "constitucionalistas" y "demócratas" y, sobre todo, intentan vender lo que han hecho siempre todos los políticos en el poder, en todos los países, en todas las épocas (la "sal"), como algo completamente nuevo, solo porque ahora lo hacen en España grupos que se hacen llamar "izquierdas", y necesitan vender como "anormalidad" lo que no tienen problema en defender como "normal" cuando son ellos quienes lo hacen o lo apoyan.
Vamos, que usted parece decir lo mismo que yo ya había dicho, pero me lo quiere vender como si fuera algo nuevo para mi.
Le pongo mi comentario entero, no el que usted parece haber recortado a la medida de su propia inteligencia, como "los de parvulitos" que están aprendiendo a leer:
"Eso, tú distingue un saco de sal de otro porque uno lleva la etiqueta "azúcar" jaja. El comunismo es lo de siempre con otra gente y bajo otro nombre, y punto."
Si no hubiera recortado usted esa segunda parte, tal vez le habría quedado más claro que hablaba de los que quieren hacer pasar la sal del viejo fascismo bajo una etiqueta nueva de "azúcar". Si ya está usted sudando para entender la literalidad, le explico lo que quiere decir la metáfora: los neofascistas intentan blanquearse llamando "fascistas" a los demás, y proclamándose a sí mismos "constitucionalistas" y "demócratas" y, sobre todo, intentan vender lo que han hecho siempre todos los políticos en el poder, en todos los países, en todas las épocas (la "sal"), como algo completamente nuevo, solo porque ahora lo hacen en España grupos que se hacen llamar "izquierdas", y necesitan vender como "anormalidad" lo que no tienen problema en defender como "normal" cuando son ellos quienes lo hacen o lo apoyan.
Vamos, que usted parece decir lo mismo que yo ya había dicho, pero me lo quiere vender como si fuera algo nuevo para mi.
Harke the Boeotarch
Dreams Wash Away
Aenean lobortis congue elit, vitae volutpat lectus maximus a. Nam euismod, nulla sed luctus imperdiet, nisl tortor elementum velit, et convallis sem felis id magna. Morbi enim libero, pretium ut malesuada a, hendrerit a ipsum. Phasellus risus mauris, sagittis et sollicitudin vitae, ultricies sed eros. Mauris libero mi, hendrerit vel eros at, tempus viverra diam. Sed tempus est quis lorem viverra, vitae fermentum lectus consequat. Nullam vitae facilisis magna, ut ultrices risus. Phasellus tortor magna, finibus a commodo nec, porta ac velit. Mauris sollicitudin dolor eget nisi volutpat interdum. Sed quis finibus elit.
Etiam condimentum ullamcorper tortor quis tincidunt. Nullam auctor venenatis nisi ornare tincidunt. Curabitur scelerisque ut augue non tincidunt. Vivamus fringilla risus eget tristique varius. Vestibulum placerat enim lobortis, consequat dolor sed, viverra magna. Donec ultricies tincidunt nunc, eget fermentum urna fringilla non. Quisque ut nulla eget arcu accumsan imperdiet. Duis fermentum aliquet nulla id lobortis. Donec eget mi urna. Ut id odio lobortis, iaculis odio eu, hendrerit mi. Sed gravida tempus felis eleifend iaculis. Morbi posuere augue quam, et varius massa viverra vitae.
Etiam condimentum ullamcorper tortor quis tincidunt. Nullam auctor venenatis nisi ornare tincidunt. Curabitur scelerisque ut augue non tincidunt. Vivamus fringilla risus eget tristique varius. Vestibulum placerat enim lobortis, consequat dolor sed, viverra magna. Donec ultricies tincidunt nunc, eget fermentum urna fringilla non. Quisque ut nulla eget arcu accumsan imperdiet. Duis fermentum aliquet nulla id lobortis. Donec eget mi urna. Ut id odio lobortis, iaculis odio eu, hendrerit mi. Sed gravida tempus felis eleifend iaculis. Morbi posuere augue quam, et varius massa viverra vitae.
