You know, a visual of just how easy is for civilization to recover completely after a collapse.
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Post something just for the heck of it
- Thread starter belamyi
- Start date
- Featured
You know, a visual of just how easy is for civilization to recover completely after a collapse.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2005
- Posts
- 8,804
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 0
Oh. My signature has little to do with the recovery of collapsed human civilization.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2005
- Posts
- 8,804
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 0
That was my point, you hippy fundie
Oh. Your point was that it had nothing to do with your own narrative. Okay.
No. My point has to do with the senseless narrative of your quote.
I see I'll need to make a thread about it.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
- Posts
- 22,238
- Reaction score
- 120
- Points
- 63
OK, who's the wise guy who lit my fart?
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2005
- Posts
- 8,804
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 0
Sure. It's the second thread in which you've made off-handed comments about it. I think it's an interesting quote, too.
It's rather that you seem to be throwing off-handed perceptions over my posts.
Sure it's an interesting quote: how a fallacious simpleton may appear to be offering deep (even 'thruthful') analysis to the gullible.
If you know what this is, you are awesome.
You mean before or after having looked it up?
http://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion...sci-fi-movie-fashion-new-wave-new-york-models
https://www.pdxmonthly.com/articles...shionable-cult-classic-comes-to-the-hollywood
Can't one be awesome for instantly pinning down the fashion styles to 1982-3?
Peloso
no, really, I'm fine
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
- Posts
- 7,057
- Reaction score
- 3,538
- Points
- 113
You cheated.
And no, those styles were never "in" fashion, not even in '82-3.
https://smile.amazon.com/Liquid-Sky...sky&qid=1555443558&s=movies-tv&sr=1-1-catcorr
Watch it, dammit!!!!
m1thousand
JUB Addict
You did this to me
You cheated.
And no, those styles were never "in" fashion, not even in '82-3.
https://smile.amazon.com/Liquid-Sky...sky&qid=1555443558&s=movies-tv&sr=1-1-catcorr
Watch it, dammit!!!!
You have no idea about the history and evolution of fashion styles
I have just read about Marina Levikova's designs inspiring the windows of Bloomingdale's, and downloaded the YouTube copy of the movie, and the general style of the fashions in the pic you posted is still more the original, more severe 1970s' punk style than the mainstream glossed-over version that we all came to find everywhere from 1984 on.Read and study my XXth century chronology above, damn it, it's not just about damn fashion.
Again, you didn't quite answer my question: am I even a tiny little bit awesome or not?
Peloso
no, really, I'm fine
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
- Posts
- 7,057
- Reaction score
- 3,538
- Points
- 113
You have no idea about the history and evolution of fashion styles
Correct!
Right, otherwise you wouldn't mix up the general trends of fashion in the late 1970s, with the particular designs, both avant-garde/fashion-forward and mainstream, that springed from them during the 1980s.
The what??
You should see my closet.
Being a rag bug doesn't make you a fashion connoisseur
Miranda Priestly!?!! 
This scene shows how much she is like Anna Wintour and, therefore, how unworthy she is of her status as "fashion priestess":
Because:
1-. That there are zillions of people in "jobs" around fashion, no matter how "hard" they work or not, doesn't say anything for those "jobs" and that industry and, rather, much against it
and
2.- The fact that the best you can do to justify those "jobs" and "industry" is to wait for someone to regurgite past fashions and old, dull pantones, until their influence trickles down to the "Casual Corner" racoons, doesn't rise you above the level of those latter... AT ALL
Tel fait du mieux qu'il peut, qui ne fait chose qui vaille.
This scene shows how much she is like Anna Wintour and, therefore, how unworthy she is of her status as "fashion priestess":
Because:
1-. That there are zillions of people in "jobs" around fashion, no matter how "hard" they work or not, doesn't say anything for those "jobs" and that industry and, rather, much against it
and
2.- The fact that the best you can do to justify those "jobs" and "industry" is to wait for someone to regurgite past fashions and old, dull pantones, until their influence trickles down to the "Casual Corner" racoons, doesn't rise you above the level of those latter... AT ALL
Tel fait du mieux qu'il peut, qui ne fait chose qui vaille.