You did not care to actually read what I had written in my comment.
I said that Spain is one of those countries that must put a double effort to get their talent and achievements recognized for their true worth, against other countries which enjoy a solid reputation of general achievement, in athletics like in scientific research or entrepreneurial drive and innovation and, therefore, get usually prized for what they had achieved before than for what they actually do in some more recent particular occasion.
Therefore, Spain, and other middle or lesser international powers, can be compared to women who are requested to put at least a double effort than what is expected from men, in order to gain general recognition. For example, Russia is systematically favoured in competitions like gymnastics or synchronized swimming, and juries always favour the elements in which Russian teams excel, rather than those with which teams like Spain get ahead of them: so Russia is praised for the perfect execution or decade-old exercises, and is not requested to raise up to the level of technical difficulty that more innovative and creative teams like Spain offer to them.
As for gynocentrism, you are mistaking the European and Western tradition derived from Medieval French courtesy, with the general tone of the society: the Western world is as androcentric as virtually the rest of the world, except from some few, isolated ethnicities scattered here and there around the world. Whenever a female appears as some sort of "center" in the Western world, is always as some sort of object of pleasure and enjoyment for men. The fact that females are allowed to exposed themselves in the Western world in a way not allowed in Asian countries, Muslim or non-Muslim, is merely because men are more hedonist than moralist about it: that is why so many men get so upset at women who are just as careless in their personal grooming as those men are themselves. And it does not take any sort of Muslim, Eastern invasion to revert that degree of "fake liberty", since moral strictures and prudishness have been present in the Western World, in Old Europe like in the USA, for the same centuries in which the mere showcasing of female beauties has been presented as the sort of apparent "gynocentrism" to which you were referring.
Like most people, you take the apex of the social pyramid for the whole of it or, if you prefer, take the part of the iceberg appearing over the water surface for the whole of it, and you are referring to a position that, again, does not need any sort of foreign influence to be toppled, just like Germany did not need any sort of non-Germanic influence (Hitler was Austrian-born) to fall from the general consideration of it as a cultured and scientifically developed country, identified with the mere shiny coronation of the whole nation, into the barbarity which was hiding below, among the true whole of the population. Like people are now facing, while still refusing to acknowledge, that the GENERAL TONE of tolerance and technological ingenuity and forwardness associated with the USA, is far from being the true FUNDAMENTAL NATURE that the "general tone" has been wrapping the whole.
If anything, it will not be an invasion, because it never is: it will be an alliance of the same backward, antimisogynist tartuffian forces present in sham Christianism like in sham Islamism, like in any other sort of religion or morals of the fundamentally "androcentric" world in which we live, what will end with the appearance of "gynocentrism" you associated as peculiar to Germany... just like Constantinople was conquered and ravaged in 1204 by Christians, thanks to Christian inside traitors to the Greek, or it finally fell in 1453 because Christian Western Europe considered Christian Greeks as heretic as Muslims, and had been even allied with them against Constantinople, as Charlemagne had done, for example.
I said that Spain is one of those countries that must put a double effort to get their talent and achievements recognized for their true worth, against other countries which enjoy a solid reputation of general achievement, in athletics like in scientific research or entrepreneurial drive and innovation and, therefore, get usually prized for what they had achieved before than for what they actually do in some more recent particular occasion.
Therefore, Spain, and other middle or lesser international powers, can be compared to women who are requested to put at least a double effort than what is expected from men, in order to gain general recognition. For example, Russia is systematically favoured in competitions like gymnastics or synchronized swimming, and juries always favour the elements in which Russian teams excel, rather than those with which teams like Spain get ahead of them: so Russia is praised for the perfect execution or decade-old exercises, and is not requested to raise up to the level of technical difficulty that more innovative and creative teams like Spain offer to them.
As for gynocentrism, you are mistaking the European and Western tradition derived from Medieval French courtesy, with the general tone of the society: the Western world is as androcentric as virtually the rest of the world, except from some few, isolated ethnicities scattered here and there around the world. Whenever a female appears as some sort of "center" in the Western world, is always as some sort of object of pleasure and enjoyment for men. The fact that females are allowed to exposed themselves in the Western world in a way not allowed in Asian countries, Muslim or non-Muslim, is merely because men are more hedonist than moralist about it: that is why so many men get so upset at women who are just as careless in their personal grooming as those men are themselves. And it does not take any sort of Muslim, Eastern invasion to revert that degree of "fake liberty", since moral strictures and prudishness have been present in the Western World, in Old Europe like in the USA, for the same centuries in which the mere showcasing of female beauties has been presented as the sort of apparent "gynocentrism" to which you were referring.
Like most people, you take the apex of the social pyramid for the whole of it or, if you prefer, take the part of the iceberg appearing over the water surface for the whole of it, and you are referring to a position that, again, does not need any sort of foreign influence to be toppled, just like Germany did not need any sort of non-Germanic influence (Hitler was Austrian-born) to fall from the general consideration of it as a cultured and scientifically developed country, identified with the mere shiny coronation of the whole nation, into the barbarity which was hiding below, among the true whole of the population. Like people are now facing, while still refusing to acknowledge, that the GENERAL TONE of tolerance and technological ingenuity and forwardness associated with the USA, is far from being the true FUNDAMENTAL NATURE that the "general tone" has been wrapping the whole.
If anything, it will not be an invasion, because it never is: it will be an alliance of the same backward, antimisogynist tartuffian forces present in sham Christianism like in sham Islamism, like in any other sort of religion or morals of the fundamentally "androcentric" world in which we live, what will end with the appearance of "gynocentrism" you associated as peculiar to Germany... just like Constantinople was conquered and ravaged in 1204 by Christians, thanks to Christian inside traitors to the Greek, or it finally fell in 1453 because Christian Western Europe considered Christian Greeks as heretic as Muslims, and had been even allied with them against Constantinople, as Charlemagne had done, for example.
... 
as usual, greater vocal music sounds better in one's head 
