The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Public acceptance of evolution

Where is that wascally wabbit? He hasn't posted since yesterday morning.

Perhaps he found himself in a stew?

I seriously think that, if he had read what we wrote and read what he wrote, it wouldn't have gone this far. I admire him for his convictions and beliefs (if they were, indeed, genuine) but he tried so hard to prove himself right that he couldn't even see that he was doing just the opposite.
 
johaninsc said:
f I got it right, they're trying to recreate the conditions of the Big Bang;something like that?
Click to expand...

They aren't trying to recreate the Big Bang. That would be impossible since nobody knows how to create one. Instead, one of the things they are trying to study is what might have happened in the fractions of seconds following the Big Bang.

If you're interested, here's the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) website and the experiments being studied: http://www.lhc.ac.uk/
 
Yea, the LHC is probably the greatest feat of human engineering thus far. It really is a marvel. :)

Has the LHC successfully created particles yet? :confused: I thought it did, but after googling I can't seem to find anything about it.
 
Whew! I promise I will try to get back to you guys with some rebuttals. I had fun the other day discussing this topic. I think I'm hookin' up. :-)
Wish me luck?
I love you all.:kiss:
 
Corny said:
oooh and how smoooothly you ignored the links that I provided you were even the creationists themselves say that this kind of argument is bullshit and you should not use it :)
you really need to buy that dvd.
Click to expand...

"the creationists"? I'm not linked wtih them. I think they are befuddled or else downright deceitful. I haven't seen one who really believes the Bible. No DVDs required.
 
killdawabbit said:
No, I didn't. I don't know where you get that. I consistently state there are no transitional forms. Reread my posts.
Click to expand...

And we have explained them with evidence proving evolution, and you have accepted our explanations and evidence which means that you also accept evolution, yet you still deny both the evidence and evolution exist.

You can't have it both ways.
 
randomfreak said:
Has the LHC successfully created particles yet? :confused: I thought it did, but after googling I can't seem to find anything about it.
Click to expand...

It has, many times over. And now the scientists are upping the ante in search of the 'God particle' (the theoretical Higgs particle which gives other particles their mass).

This article was just posted online yesterday:

The 'God particle'

The Higgs, also known mystically as the "God particle," is a theoretical particle that gives other particles their mass. According to the concept, Higgs particles create a field throughout the universe, and when other particles pass through the field, they interact with it and acquire mass.

If LHC can create one of these Higgs particles, it would be a major coup for physicists and would go a long way toward explaining the fundamental nature of matter.

The particle accelerator is probably not producing enough collisions yet to find the Higgs, but even at its current levels, scientific experiments are ongoing.

"All the experiments are working very well - we've certainly given them a good data set this year," Lamont said. "But to find the really interesting stuff like Higgs or supersymmetry, they're going to need a lot more data."

Supersymmetry - another big goal for LHC - is the theory that every particle has a partner particle that has similar properties but a different spin. (The supersymmetric partner of a quark would be a squark, and the partner of the electron is called the selectron - apparently physicists love silly names).

Many of these particles would be very massive and very difficult to detect, but the lightest of them could be created during the crashes in LHC, scientists predict.

Full throttle ahead

To get to the point where Higgs and supersymmetric particles might be discovered, the LHC will likely have to function at peak capacity.

"For us it really is a matter of increasing the amount of data we deliver to the experiments - they just need more, more, more," Lamont said. "They're looking for a very small needle in very large haystack."

The accelerator was designed to run at energy levels of 7 teraelectron volts (TeV), but right now it is only going at half that power - 3.5 TeV.

That's because the cables connecting the superconducting magnets that propel the particles around the LHC ring were built with a flaw that was revealed shortly after the machine was first turned on. In order to ramp up the power, LHC workers will have to shut down the accelerator and make significant repairs to the magnet connectors.

Once that's done and LHC is running at peak design parameters, particles will be colliding at mind-blowing rates.

"Our collision rate eventually will be enormous," Lamont said. "When we get to design, we're talking 600 million events per second."

For comparison, about 6 million particles currently collide per second.

That's still not too shabby. The machine is already more sensitive in some channels than the world's second-largest atom smasher, Fermilab's Tevatron in Batavia, Ill.
Click to expand...

Full Report: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/yahoocanada/101021/canada/atom_smasher_ramps_up_hunt_for__god_particle
 
Thanks, gsdx. :) So that confirms that my memory is correct.

And wabbit, if you are not trolling and really sincere, then I guess I can relate with you. (*8*) I'm just as argumentative by nature, and I often rush headlong into opposition... but often, after I cool down, I ponder the opposing points and realize that a lot of what they're saying is true. You might also want to reread the previous posts and think from our perspective, and you might find that a lot of previous posters made excellent, logical, and valid arguments. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top