The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Raging Stallion launches "Straight For Pay" line

Re: Raging Stallion launches "Straight For Pay" li

It looks like the straight for pay line went downhill.They were supposed to release porn with gay men having straight sex.The movie never came out.

They possibly thought that gay men would not buy it.So they change their mind.

Most gay men was against this straight for pay thing from the get go.

Gay men must be happy that gay porn will stay gay porn.

 
Re: Raging Stallion launches "Straight For Pay" li

It looks like the straight for pay line went downhill.They were supposed to release porn with gay men having straight sex.The movie never came out.

They possibly thought that gay men would not buy it.So they change their mind.

Most gay men was against this straight for pay thing from the get go.

Gay men must be happy that gay porn will stay gay porn.


?

They did released the movie, though it was more of a bi-flick. After that things seemed quiet.
 
Re: Raging Stallion launches "Straight For Pay" li

?

They did released the movie, though it was more of a bi-flick. After that things seemed quiet.

Raging Stallion never released any bi or straight porn.

The porn you talked about must be a bi movie from another studio.You must confound with another movie.

If the straight for pay porn from Raging Stallion would have been released.We would have heard about it.

 
There are too many posts and I haven't read through all of them so I may have missed but what exactly is this new product aimed at?

Gay men? Do gay men want to see other gay men having sex with women? And in such a scene, would the camera focus on the male or female partner? Even at a 50/50 split, I'd think many gay men would baulk.

Straight men? Again, I am looking at the attention of the camera - most straight men watching porn aren't interested in the male partner - only the female - so even at a 50/50 split, I'd say many straight men would not be interested.

Strange decision, I think but that's just my opinion.
 
Same reason I don't get the appeal of the straight side of COrbin Fisher or gay eyes for straight men. We're NOT intrested in seeing naked women.
 
I'm concerned that some straight men/women will want to watch straight-for-pay to get a laugh, which would only serve to polarize the gay/straight communities outside of the porn world.
 
You guys are nutty as a fruit cake (get it fruit cake HA!) if you don't think any of this is gonna sale. Their are plenty of gay/bi guys out their who are fans of certain guys in general and could could watch them shave or read the news paper. Anything some guys are in it could sale. You also have to remember that if the video is made the old fashion way (which focuses in on the girl) and put on a separate sight it will also sale (ignorance is).

And many of you also do not realize that gay guys put up with anything that is thrown at them. Hell ive seen many of "big" time names flat out come out and say how disgusted they are with some of the things they did, who was that guy malyakahi max or what ever over at RandyB and some of the other guys pop up on random sits and radio saying how its only done for money and yada yada. And then months later they pop up again on the same sites making the same money if not more. So I really don't see how any of this is a bad idea. Ive seen a few guys actually say they find the straight stuff hotter. And it generally is.
 
Re: Raging Stallion launches "Straight For Pay" li

ok I'm straight and this is beyond stupid

I don't think this will appeal to anyone I know

No offense but who wants to see a bunch of fags screwing chicks

I don't get it at all

Oh yea and that too. But i believing this project. And hey, ive seen plenty of guys do both and get away with it. In fact, ive almost been shocked to find out they have done both. As long as the casting is done well im all for it.
 
One would assume that Raging Stallion have done enough market research to see a market for this, although clearly there are many folk here who are not in that market.

Be interesting to see how it develops.

-T.
 
*rolls eyes*

The words “gay” and “straight” when applied to professional hard-core porn stars are utterly ridiculous. IMO they are paid to perform on camera by getting their dicks hard and their rocks off for the amusement of paying customers.

The only time they are really “gay” or “straight” is when they are living their private lives, determined by all the same desires and drives that govern our own sexualities. But on camera? It’s the money, honey. I think it takes a special kind of person to do real, hard-core porn like the RS guys. Kudos to them.

This “str8 for pay” niche they are exploring isn’t a surprise; except that others have not monopolized it first. I know there have been a few to do it as a one-shot, like in ChiChi’s ‘Shifting Gears’ bi-adventure, but I imagine there may be a lot of women who fantasize about gettin’ with a gay guy; but I doubt they are fantasising about the RS guys.

This is where the RS guys may find it fails to fully penetrate their target market; they sell their models to gay men as being macho-fuck-studs. But in my personal, first-hand experience, when a women gets smitten with her gay-friend, it isn’t because she is fantasising about fucking some uber-butch muscle-top; it is because she basically wants somebody she can trust and have fun with like a girlfriend, but who also has a penis. This does not necessarily mean flaming-queen (as I am not), but typically

As fucked up as it may sound, I think the Str8-for-pay market would do better with girls being teamed with guys who are slightly femmy in their mannerisms and speech, and who have a bit of gay-face.

At least, this is my suggestion if they really wanted to appeal to a female market (which has a huge potential audience, especially for this niche). Oh, and if they are appealing exclusively to a male-market, than, again, a “gay” guy who actually seems “gay” (ya, I’m stereotyping, but please remember that we’re talking about porn; porn isn’t real) might also work better than another boring muscle-stud they can see in any other str8 porn.

Jesus Christ, when am I going to be offered a job in the industry? I have so many ideas that I should really be charging for. ;P (The first hits free, kids!)

PS: I’m not saying this won’t sell. I’m sure it will. But I don’t think the niche has yet been targeted efficiently enough to maximize its own impact and really generate the type of revenues that I believe yet remain untapped. Pun intended.

PPS: And for the record, my gold-star remains firmly intact, bitches. I’ve turned the ‘turn-down’ into a fucking science. ;)
 
As fucked up as it may sound, I think the Str8-for-pay market would do better with girls being teamed with guys who are slightly femmy in their mannerisms and speech, and who have a bit of gay-face. [...] a “gay” guy who actually seems “gay” (ya, I’m stereotyping, but please remember that we’re talking about porn; porn isn’t real) might also work better than another boring muscle-stud.

I agree! It doesn't sound fucked up - porn is a visual (an audible) medium - telling us someone is this or that is meaningless except to facilitate the viewer's fantasy (the success of which is debatable). If the guy doesn't SEEM gay, it defeats the purpose of creating this genre, in my mind.

Honestly, who actually cares what the title/description says anyway? Except for searching purposes, of course. Are we pubescent fifteen-year olds that still question the reality of what we're watching? Certainly not. For example, when I watch "Straight college guy needs cash", I couldn't give two shits about applying that scenario to my fantasy - I just want to see some butch guy getting fucked in a moving vehicle.

Albeit, sometimes I'm entertained (and even turned on) by a porn actors' commitment to "accurately" portraying their designated role - and in that sense - a guy from Raging Stallion posing as straight could actually become interesting, with time. After all, such tropes of a particular porn genre take a while develop, don't you think? (I.e. sex for cash = moving-vehicle scenario; straight for pay = ...fag-hag sleepover? :rolleyes:.)

At least, this is my suggestion if they really wanted to appeal to a female market (which has a huge potential audience, especially for this niche).

Based on the pseudo-sexual experiences I've had with gay-obsessed female friends in the past, I would certainly agree. But the male market has absolute potential, as well.

I’ve turned the ‘turn-down’ into a fucking science. ;)

LOL! Brilliant. :D
 
Sorry, he does have a bald head. he's attractive. buck is more man than any of my boyfriends i ever had.
 
Any body remember black porn star bottom boy Richard Reyes, he did a bi movie with Bobby Blake. I was shocked when i saw that clip.
 
Re: Raging Stallion launches "Straight For Pay" li

No offense but I don't give two shits if you're straight or not. Don't call people fags on this site. You, my heterosexual friend, do not have the right to use that word.

Especially here.

Yeah, ya got that, straight boy?! No, seriously, why would you use such an offensive word on a gay site, or at all? Trust me, I don't think too kindly of most straight men. How about me using "heteroshit"? Like that? Watch your mouth.
 
Gay-for-pay appeals to the gay men who grow up being attracted to their straight friends, co-workers or fellow students.

I guess straight-for-pay could appeal to the fag hags who secretly lust after their gay friends and want to "turn them". . .but the sad truth is that women just don't watch hardcore pornography in anywhere near the numbers that men do.


Whatever.
 
Back
Top