The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Republican polarization of american politics

Andreus

JUB 10k Club
In Loving Memory
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Posts
20,444
Reaction score
19
Points
0
source.... Progressive daily beacon

...

The How and Why of America's Polarization: Republicans Declared War

A. Alexander, November 22nd, 2006
"Gosh," professional pundits and pseudo-journalists like Tim Russert and Katie Couric wonder, "how did American politics become so 'polarized?''' One assumes it is a sarcastic rhetorical question. The how and why of America's polarization is after all, as obvious as it was intentional. Most absurd, however, is the way in which the Russerts, Blitzers, and Courics of the world tend to blame the so-called liberals for America's polarized condition.

How America became polarized is simple. More than thirty years ago, the Republican Party set out on a mission to divide the country. Early on they used race-based wedge issues to make inroads into the South. Come to think of it, if the recent senate campaign in Tennessee is any indication, that whole race-based wedge issue trick remains a vital and vibrant part of today's Republican electoral strategy. When pitting Anglo-American against African-American finally failed to get the big results, Republicans turned to the so-called social issues. They rode abortion for all it was worth. Then the Republicans simply declared war. They call it a "culture war," but for them it is a very real war. In some cases, regarding doctors that provide abortions, the Republican war has become a shooting war...and at abortion clinics, a bombing war.

For the better part of twenty years blathering buffoons like Rush Limbaugh, mouth-frothing morons like Sean Hannity, bigots like Michael Savage, and liberal assassination supporting bit...ladies like Ann Coulter have been making it their business to ensure that the "Conservative Crusaders" understood who America's real enemy was. Then along came FOX "News" and before the country knew what had hit, the entire Republican Party propaganda network -- the people that started and declared the "culture war" -- was busy telling the GOP faithful that the LIBERALS were waging a war against CONSERVATIVES ... against "American values," Christianity, and anybody that disagreed with "their secularist agenda."

Boy-howdy damn! If Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly, and FOX News's listeners and viewers didn't get their butts in gear the liberal horde was going to burn down their churches, make their children engage in "home-ah-sectial" sex, force conservatives' daughters to become impregnated by black men and then make them abort the babies. This insanity started more than twenty years ago and continues on through to this day. The media, of course -- the Russerts, Courics, Blitzers et al -- pretends that this very real and pervasive GOP propaganda network either exists in a vacuum or isn't related to the Republican Party.

"Hmmm...just how did the country become so polarized," ask the so-called journalists.

Nobody on the left, liberal or otherwise, has ever declared a war on fellow Americans. If anything, the left didn't take the threat seriously until Bush came to power and made it clear -- Crystal clear? Crystal clear, Sir! -- that the "culture war" was real and that Republicans were playing for keeps.

Once that realization finally struck home, people on the left had no option but to fight back. True enough, so-called liberals wanted legalized abortion to be a choice women could exercise so that they didn't have to hire Crack Dealer Karl and his handy wire hangar and end up bleeding to death in a dark alley, but nobody ever said women had to have an abortion. Yet, Republicans have made abortion the "central front" in their "culture war." Unlike pro-choice advocates, conservatives want to tell women what medical procedures will and won't be available to them.

It is the same situation regarding publicly displayed religious symbols. People on the left view publicly displayed religion and religious symbols, as the government explicitly supporting that particular religion at the exclusion of all others and the Constitution/Bill of Rights prohibits such practices. At no time ever, has a so-called liberal said that snake worshipping evangelical Christians couldn't practice their religion (if you are wondering, there are real sects that do worship snakes). All anyone has ever said was that the government shouldn't be in the business of being perceived as supporting Christianity over Judaism over Islam over Hinduism or any other religion or non-religion. There isn't a single liberal that has ever called for limiting the free practice of any religion.

Reasonable Republicans and the Republican Party knew these things to be the case, but they didn't care. The GOP knew people on the left weren't going to try and outlaw religion or force abortion on people. Republicans willfully and actively created and exploited these non-issues in order to "polarize" the country and win a few votes. But the insidious part of this is that Republicans really and truly want to limit Americans' options.

Whereas the left only seeks to limit religious intrusion on fellow Americans, the Republicans want to impose their religion on all Americans. Whereas the left only seeks the right for women to make their own choices about their bodies and futures, the Republicans want to tell women what they will do. And that is a huge difference.

Still, not even hot-button social issues could truly raise the ire of most people on the left. No, that didn't happen until President Bush and the Republican Party started labeling environmental groups as being "terrorist" organizations, started spying on American citizens that didn't support their policies and political objectives, began illegally eavesdropping on phone calls, and passed legislation that gave the government the right to enter homes without warrant or warning. That is when the left really realized that Republicans were dead serious about this thing they called a "culture war."

Whereas the left only seeks reasonable limits on the government's powers, the Republicans believe the government should have unlimited power to do as they please and when they please. And that is a huge difference.

The how and why of America's political polarization is obvious. That the Russerts, Blitzers, and Courics pretend not to know the answers or to understand what brought the nation to this point is absurd. Just incase the answer continues to elude them, here it is: America became polarized when the people on the left realized that the Republican Party was serious when they declared war on fellow Americans. The left had no choice but to engage in that war. History is littered with the mass graves of those that didn't take seriously the threat of war declared upon them by their fellow countrymen.

If by chance the so-called journalists feel an urge to smirk and roll their eyes - just ask Keith Olbermann, Tom Brokaw, and Democratic politicians if they didn't feel seriously threatened or under siege when they opened the envelopes stuffed with anthrax-like white powder. Ask the people working at abortion clinics that have to check their garbage for bombs or the doctors that have been shot by the Republican "culture warriors."

This country is polarized all right, but only because that is how the Republican Party wanted it to be. After all, it was the Republican Party that actually declared war on fellow Americans. War is inherently "polarizing" is it not?
 
Thanks, that was a very interesting article. I don't know enough about American politics, but I do agree that Coulter and Limbaughs of the world are milking the stupid with their non-issue inanities and fear of the improbable.

Why do American have such a cultural amnesia from one generation to another? Fifty years ago, you had McCarthyism. Now?
 
This article is a good example of polarization

The virtues of the left "they only seeks reasonable limits on the government's powers"

vs.

the evil Republicans " they believe the government should have unlimited power to do as they please and when they please"

consider the source of this drivel

this is propaganda - plain and simple

thanks but no thanks
 
in civil words, chance, that translates as... thanks, I respectfully disagree;)
 
in civil words, chance, that translates as... thanks, I respectfully disagree;)

dude this is a hate filled blog

and it is propaganda - bad propaganda at that

it is taking the concept of us vs. them - and putting it of course on "them"

"It's their fault"

come on - this is partisan crap
 
the article seems reasonable to me and thats why i posted it

well thought out and quite convincing

if you have any facts to dispute the piece, lets hear them.
 
the article seems reasonable to me and thats why i posted it

well thought out and quite convincing

if you have any facts to dispute the piece, lets hear them.

Boy-howdy damn! If Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly, and FOX News's listeners and viewers didn't get their butts in gear the liberal horde was going to burn down their churches, make their children engage in "home-ah-sectial" sex, force conservatives' daughters to become impregnated by black men and then make them abort the babies. This insanity started more than twenty years ago and continues on through to this day. The media, of course -- the Russerts, Courics, Blitzers et al -- pretends that this very real and pervasive GOP propaganda network either exists in a vacuum or isn't related to the Republican Party.

this article is reasonable?

u think so?

really?
 
thats what they seemed to be doing to me

you have to know that my loathing for the politics of fear is not new and I have been bitching about it at JUb for quite a while

what exactly do you think I was refering to?
 
Note: one factual error; there are NOT any Christian sects that worship snakes, though it might look like it to the ignorant. There ARE sects which use snakes in worship, due to an odd misunderstanding of a particular verse at the end of one of the Gospels.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

I also thought the article was polarizing -- a nice piece of work meant to fan the emotions of the loyal. On the other hand, it has a good deal of honest material in it -- which just goes to show that the style Limbaugh used to get started is still alive and well: mix passion with truth, tilt it to your preferred audience, spin it to promote antagonism, and serve. This writer, though, hasn't reached anywhere near the heights (depths?) Limbaugh has achieved.

Yes, it is propaganda; yes, it engages in hyperbole -- but it still delivers some chunks of truth.
 
Just so - one man's propaganda is another man's truth

ditto-heads believe what ever they are told by Rush and company it is frightening how little they think for themselves

there may be the same on the democrat side, but just not as infamous

it will not get any better
 
Just so - one man's propaganda is another man's truth

ditto-heads believe what ever they are told by Rush and company it is frightening how little they think for themselves

there may be the same on the democrat side, but just not as infamous

it will not get any better

Propaganda can BE truth -- in fact it works better if you include some. I don't buy this relative truth notion, that something may be true for you but not for me. If a thing is true, it's true.

There are two rabid liberal talk show hosts who are about as bad as Rush; they ridicule and belittle callers who get their words twisted, or voice an opinion they don't like, and of course have their ditto-head followings.

I agree that, unfortunately, it won't get any better, unless we somehow manage to have a free country again, where people don't just expect the government to do everything for them. When you have to actually take responsibility for your life, you usually learn to put the brain in gear.
 
Andreus:

You asked if this article is reasonable? It appears to be an editorial or opinion piece, obviously written from the author's own viewpoint rather than anykind of factual writing. People with the same view as the editorial writer would obviously agree with it.

My comment in regard to what you might call "conservative" talk show program's apparent success is that there is a a good segment of America that shares "some" of those same thoughts. Just look at Fox's ratings versus CNN, MSNC and others. There aren't as many "liberal" talk programs; because there doesn't need to be. Those views are expressed often enough in some of the prominent mainstream newspapers and TV networks(CNN, NBC,CBS, MSNBC, ....).
 
i would say that the organsations that use factual information to present news are just unbiased.

it is only a coincidence that the liberal perspective relies on facts as they do while the conservative perspective uses morals and emotions to move its agenda.
 
i would say that the organsations that use factual information to present news are just unbiased.

it is only a coincidence that the liberal perspective relies on facts as they do while the conservative perspective uses morals and emotions to move its agenda.

Andreus: I respectively disagree with this OPINION of yours on liberals versus conservatives and "facts" versus "emotions or morals".

Too much of the time both and TV and newspapers; journalists inject their personal opinions or biases into the stories. This makes them more of a commentary even though it is suppose to be strictly reporting of "facts"

This whole topic should probably be done with a different thread though. Journalists themselves may have more to do with the polarization factor than politicians.
 
the journalists did not make the republicans govern in the entirely partizan method that they have inj the last six years.

its kind of hard to avoid that reality
 
^Andreus: I will be up for a discussion on the topic of journalistic biases on another thread and another day!!
 
Back
Top