The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Republicans Can Kiss Hispanics Bu-Bye After Sotomayor Vote

^^I'm failing to see what's different between what you're saying and what the OP said. He made it clear that the map represented where democrats and republicans did better percentage wise than they did in the previous election.
 
The interesting thing is that, except for Arizona and Alaska, pretty much the only red parts of the map are a belt of the Upper South stretching from Oklahoma through Arkansas and Tennessee, and along the Appalachians all the way into New York. This is now the Republican heartland.

Plus the entire state of Louisiana, which I guess succeeded in evacuating as many black voters as possible.
Click to expand...

THIS part is not relevant for the reading of the map, and is what I was referring to. This map does NOT indicate areas that support one party or another. ALL it indicates is areas that showed increased or decreased percentages for each candidate compared to '04.

It cannot be used to interpret the amount of support for either party, and this is the issue that I took with it.
 
Droid800 said:
THIS part is not relevant for the reading of the map, and is what I was referring to. This map does NOT indicate areas that support one party or another. ALL it indicates is areas that showed increased or decreased percentages for each candidate compared to '04.

It cannot be used to interpret the amount of support for either party, and this is the issue that I took with it.
Click to expand...

Nor did I intend it to it to show that. The original question (actually not even the original question of the thread) was whether the Republican party is now mainly a party of the South. What that map shows is that their area of strongest support (where more people voted for McCain than for Bush) is actually in what I'm calling the Upper South, or what some people call border states.

Now in many cases these areas have a smaller black population than the deep South, which certainly affects the red and blue in the map. I'd be interested to see a similar map that shows only the white vote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top