The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Republicans looking to repeal marriage equality in NH

hotatlboi

hotatlboi

JUB Addict
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Posts
8,655
Reaction score
137
Points
0
Location
Atlanta
Well Republicans took control of both houses in NH based on the outcome of the Nov elections, and this is the result.

http://www.pridesource.com/article.html?article=44447

If you vote Republican, not only will they oppose any new equal rights for gays, they will move to take away whatever existing rights you may have.

How gay people still cannot see this is beyond me.
 
And cue Jack Springer, Pixel, FastEddy, Chance, Supersix and Latka to come rushing to the defense of the Republican'ts.

Until DADT is repealed, this shit will keep happening.

I think that a lot of homo marriage opponents understand as well that if homos can serve openly in the military it is the beginning of the end for the fundamentalist control of the social agenda.

Well, all the homos in NH can just move to Massachusetts.
 
The sickening thing to me is that they operate from the standpoint that it's some type of choice, failing to realize that everytime the walk past a hospital nursery 10% of those babies are gay. Turning one's back on family, friends and neighbors sounds a lot like the Jewish question in Nazi Germany. I also think they're cunts for calling discrimination a social agenda. It seems to me to be an anti-social agenda.
 
DonnyElmstad said:
Again, I'd like to apologize to the universe for EVER calling myself a Republican.

I was young and foolish...forgive, please?
Click to expand...

The last time I voted for a Republican, he ended up in the slammer. I rest my case. !oops!
 
This is what we get when the vogters gave the GOP the majority in 2010.
 
Those retards keep voting the Republicans in. Living proof some people are unteachable.

They're the people who touch the wall when there's a wet paint sign. They'll place their hand on a hot burner when you tell them not to do it. Pathetic.
 
Remember though, 26 of the 39 Republicans who last year voted against repeal are still in office (12 didn't run again, while one switched parties and lost reelection). All 4 of the Democrats who voted for repeal were not reelected. If you do the math, we only need 5 more Republicans to avoid a fillibuster proof majority (out of the more then 100 new ones, and that's not even counting any of the existing ones who are now more likely to switch).

Also, if gay marriage is repealed in New Hampshire, expect a flood of lawsuits to come (Perry v Schwarzenegger-esque).
 
hotatlboi said:
With equality in NH resting on phrases like that, the future for gay marriage in NH is tenuous at best.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you forgot the New Hampshire state house has 400 members. Five out of 250+ is not difficult at all. Also, I heard reports that 13 of the new Republicans are self-discribed "libertarians" who likely will vote against repeal.
 
scream4ever said:
Perhaps you forgot the New Hampshire state house has 400 members.
Click to expand...

Nope. But I also haven't forgotten how when a Republican says they will support gay rights, history has shown us that that doesn't always make it so, as the recent votes on DADT certainly have reminded us. They will frequently come up with an excuse to vote against us if given sufficient pressure by their intolerant leadership (and the incoming state house leader is a total bigot).
 
The DADT vote was about many other things too (not having "sufficient" debate time, wanting to get the tax extentions done first, etc.).

Like I said, 5 out of over 250 is not unlikely at all.
 
well it's always something. Few people are just going to come out and say "I hate gay people". That's not politically wise. But that is the motivation for many, even if they put up other reasons publicly.
 
Well they do hate gay people, it may not be politically correct to call homophobic people gay haters, but its accurate. I'm just waiting for a moderator to remove this post, proves my point.
 
hotatlboi said:
Huh? The Republicans will continue trying to do things like this long after DADT is repealed.
Click to expand...


But it won't be as effective. And they'll have no grounds for support.

Trust me on this. Gays in the military will be the sea change that will render the fundie right wing impotent.
 
rareboy said:
But it won't be as effective. And they'll have no grounds for support.

Trust me on this. Gays in the military will be the sea change that will render the fundie right wing impotent.
Click to expand...

That would be great but I just don't see it. I think they will continue to have serious influence on gay issues for another decade or more.

Perhaps when gay marriage is legal in the entire US their efforts to take away rights will start to subside a bit. I don't see it happening before then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top