Can we post this on the giant screen at the front so that the people waaay at the back can see?
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Can we post this on the giant screen at the front so that the people waaay at the back can see?
Judge sides with New York Times in challenge to policy limiting reporters’ access to Pentagon
A federal judge agreed Friday to block the Trump administration from enforcing a policy limiting news reporters’ access to the Pentagon, agreeing with The New York Times that key portions of the new rules are unlawful.
U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C., sided with the newspaper and ruled that the Pentagon policy illegally restricts the press credentials of reporters who walked out of the building rather than agree to the new rules.
The Times sued the Pentagon and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in December, claiming the credentialing policy violates the journalists’ constitutional rights to free speech and due process.
The current Pentagon press corps is comprised mostly of conservative outlets that agreed to the policy. Reporters from outlets that refused to consent to the new rules, including from The Associated Press, have continued reporting on the military.
OPINION granting plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying defendants' 22 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants shall file a status report on or before March 27, 2026. See Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on March 20, 2026. (lccm) (Entered: 03/20/2026)
‘Good Riddance’: How a MAGA Acolyte Helped Oust Antitrust Chief
Abigail Slater’s ouster as the Trump administration’s antitrust chief was abrupt, yet also a long time coming.
On Thursday morning, Slater was telling confidants in Washington that she intended to move forward with the agency’s work, even as rumors circulated she might be leaving. Just before 11 a.m., she announced her departure in a post on X.
Slater, who took over as the top antitrust cop less than a year ago, had gotten a call from the White House personnel office, according to people with knowledge of the matter. It was the culmination of months of tensions with more business-friendly factions in the administration, along with the influence of government outsiders like Mike Davis, a MAGA firebrand who has emerged as a powerful advocate for companies seeking mergers.
An Attempted Coup at the Antitrust Division
MAGA-linked operatives are trying to overthrow populists at the Antitrust Division over a corrupt $14 billion merger deal. The wrinkle is a liberal judge has the power to expose what's happening.
Something unusual happening in the antitrust world this week. On Wednesday evening, there was an attempted coup by what looks like MAGA-linked corporate lobbyists against Gail Slater, Trump’s Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust. Slater is known as something of a populist, having worked in roles opposing Google, and staffing J.D. Vance in the Senate. So this attack is involves two different factions on the right competing over power. And like stories involving massive amounts of money and power hidden behind cultural disputes, just two outlets - The Capitol Forum and Semafor - reported on it.
The backstory is that a few weeks ago, acting associate attorney general Chad Mizelle - Pam Bondi’s chief of staff - got into a fight with Slater over what looks like an obscure and sort of unimportant merger, Hewlett Packard’s $14 billion acquisition of Juniper Networks. The two companies make wifi systems for big campuses, like universities or corporations, and there are just three firms in the market.
It’s a pretty obvious case, and the Division filed to block the merger in January, to the cheers of MAGA influencer Mike Davis, who is close with Donald Trump and was responsible for judicial nominations during much of Trump’s first term. Davis is known as a populist, a fierce defender of Trump, and someone supportive of the cases against big tech. He’s a frequent guest on Steve Bannon’s show, and helped defeat the AI regulation moratorium. This challenge suggested that Davis’ brand of populism was on the ascent, and it scared Wall Street.
www.flyingpenguin.com
Here’s the simple math. Slater had been confirmed 78-19, in the most bipartisan vote of Trump’s second term after Rubio. She was supposed to be the whole face of “MAGA antitrust,” the populist enforcement wing that would take on Big Tech and corporate monopolies.
Then she discovered MAGA isn’t about rule of law. It’s a dictatorship — chaotic by design, because stability would mean someone could hold the rules steady long enough to enforce them. She found the antitrust division was being bypassed entirely, not to serve policy but to serve whoever could pay the right fixer.
Live Nation hired Davis and Kellyanne Conway to negotiate a settlement directly with senior DOJ officials, cutting the antitrust division and Slater out. When Slater opposed settling the HPE-Juniper merger, AG Bondi’s chief of staff overruled her and fired two top deputies. When Slater and her lawyers recommended an extended review of the Compass-Anywhere real estate merger, DOJ leadership cleared it after Compass’s lawyers went directly to Deputy AG Todd Blanche.
And the next time you buy a concert ticket and you wonder why they are so expensive, it's because of Trump and because you're financing some bribe that LiveNation/Ticketmaster. The "settlement" was negotiated at the White House in a meeting with Pam Bondi and the CEO of LiveNation without anyone from the DOJ Anti-trust Division in attendance.There's several traits that all autocrats have in common. One of them is overt pay-to-play bribery and another is how the enrich themselves (and their family members) with generous donations from wealthy people and wealthy corporations looking for favors.
Justice Department and Live Nation reach settlement over illegal monopoly case
The Justice Department touted a tentative settlement of its antitrust lawsuit against Ticketmaster and parent company Live Nation Entertainment on Monday as a victory for consumers that would end an illegal monopoly over live events in America, but over two dozen states planned to keep fighting the companies in court.
The negotiations leading up to the agreement drew criticism from the judge who would have to approve any deal as soon as a government lawyer revealed it in Manhattan federal court, where an antitrust trial began last week. Throughout the day, various state attorneys general issued statements criticizing the agreement.
Trump Just Pardoned Ticketmaster When No One Was Looking
The Trump DOJ settled with Ticketmaster, while state enforcers said they'll continue. The judge is mad, the parties showed "absolute disrespect for the court, for the jury, for this entire process."
There are a also bunch of oddities in the process, to say the leaset. First, the settlement was seemingly hidden from Judge Arun Subramanian. The term sheet was signed on March 5th by the CEO of Live Nation and the Acting Assistant Attorney General. The following day, there was a meeting in chambers with the judge. No one brought up the fact that there was movement with a settlement. “It was never stated to me that there was an executed term sheet that was signed the prior day,” Judge Subramanian said.
The judge apparently first found out about the executed term sheet last night. “Among other things I received notification of at 8pm last night that the parties had a term sheet,” he said. “You know what was not attached to that email? A term sheet.” He didn’t get eyes on the term sheet until 6:30 am this morning. The closest to irate this otherwise temperate judge has gotten, he told the DOJ and Live Nation that their conduct “shows absolute disrespect for the court, for the jury, for this entire process.”








