Samuel O'Toole.... what a hot piece of LITTLE man

[interpolic13]

he's fast becoming my new obsession

 

[Hellax24]

I think I'll take Samuel's word that straight guy Chad wasn't as in to it as it might have seemed. As he said before he prefers to have sex with men/women that want to have sex with him and that he in turn wants to have sex with. I hope he avoids Next Door and their bullshit from now on.

Is this Love Connection or Porn???

If Chad wasn't into him or the sex it didn't come across on screen and that is what a performer is supposed to do. If Sam thinks he's only going to be working with people that are into "Him" then i think he has some major disappointment coming his way. There is no way that everyone in porn gets to work with people they are into or vice versa all the time.

CXXX

 

[Allicide]

Is this Love Connection or Porn???

If Chad wasn't into him or the sex it didn't come across on screen and that is what a performer is supposed to do. If Sam thinks he's only going to be working with people that are into "Him" then i think he has some major disappointment coming his way. There is no way that everyone in porn gets to work with people they are into or vice versa all the time.

CXXX

I don't think it was his issue with them being turn on by him so much as an issue if the straight guy - or any guy for that matter- isn't comfortable having sex then it makes things very difficult to work with them. He was comparing the sex scenes he had with gay men-who were into the sex- to his scene with Chad-a straight guy who just wanted to get the minimum footage- and get it over with. I think the point wasn't about being into the person you are haing sex with but if you aren't gay, don't like gay sex, and struggle to perform (Chad) then you make it difficult for the person who would normally be into the act (Sammy) to do their job.

 

[Hellax24]

I don't think it was his issue with them being turn on by him so much as an issue if the straight guy - or any guy for that matter- isn't comfortable having sex then it makes things very difficult to work with them. He was comparing the sex scenes he had with gay men-who were into the sex- to his scene with Chad-a straight guy who just wanted to get the minimum footage- and get it over with. I think the point wasn't about being into the person you are haing sex with but if you aren't gay, don't like gay sex, and struggle to perform (Chad) then you make it difficult for the person who would normally be into the act (Sammy) to do their job.

What you think and what he posted are 2 very different things.

He did not include straight guys because he said it was more difficult to connect with them. That would be HIS issue. He also went on to address someone who perceived Chad as gay and Sam as being straight. His reply is that Chad bottomed pretty well. He never mentioned Chad or any straight going in there and getting the minimum footage.

I also see you didn't waste yet another chance to slam Nextdoor.

CXXX

 

[Allicide]

What you think and what he posted are 2 very different things.

He did not include straight guys because he said it was more difficult to connect with them. That would be HIS issue. He also went on to address someone who perceived Chad as gay and Sam as being straight. His reply is that Chad bottomed pretty well. He never mentioned Chad or any straight going in there and getting the minimum footage.

I also see you didn't waste yet another chance to slam Nextdoor.

CXXX

I don't know what you talking about. I'm referring to comments made on his blog/Twitter. I was referring to his comparing Ari to Chad. Where he said the scene was OK but could have been much better if Chad had been into it. I did NOT say that he didn't like working with straight guys. I'm referring to that comment that he made about his work with Ari being better.

As for Next Door - I think they are the worst, homophobic, soulless, studio out there and I WILL take every chance to point out how bad they are since they are big boys with Buddy Profits bucks to promote themselves, I think they can take it.

 

[cmlei70]

Why wouldn't a sane porn viewer think O'Toole is straight? He does a straight scene over at NDH. His first gay scene for NDB is shot like the typical gay man worshipping straight man because of big dick scene. He doesn't kiss. He doesn't suck. He doesn't reciprocate. He's another Girth Brooks. Whether that was him or the director, the viewer doesn't know. I'm not surprised the straight guy didn't enjoy being the "gay" performer in the scene. As a gay man, I HATE those scenes. After seeing that scene, I pegged O'Toole as the typical g4per. Nothing in that scene made me curious to see more of either performer.

Samuel O'Toole does a gay scene for CocksureMen which was very good, but then he makes a point of saying how he doesn't enjoy anything near his ass which is what most g4pers say(and I know some gay men don't like bottoming, but the no ass stuff is typical g4p talk). He claims he's bi (which may be true), but most g4pers say that now. He of course does a scene for SG4GE. Almost letter for letter out of the g4p handbook.

I'm not attacking the man. I have nothing against him. He seems like an amiable person, and one who is willing to please. I'll watch his gay scenes. His gay scene on CocksureMen was really good, but because of all the lies that go on in gp about sexual identity, I don't believe for one second he's bisexual. I also doubt he'd be the new "it" boy if he were gay. Few people would have paid him any attention. I say that I because I follow a lot of the people who went nuts for him and I remember what they initially tweeted.

As a gay man, it would be nice if the it boy (rather than a manufactured it boy) were an actual gay man for once. Of course, I'd be so shocked and speechless I might not be able to enjoy the scenes.

I'm interested to see O'Toole in gay scenes, but I'm still very skeptical. Can't help it.

 

[Ninja108]

He has already had a sex scene with Connor Habib where he performs oral sex. And from his twitter, it sounds like he does it in several upcoming scenes.

 

[cmlei70]

He has already had a sex scene with Connor Habib where he performs oral sex. And from his twitter, it sounds like he does it in several upcoming scenes.

Let me clarify something. I'm not disputing that he's gay friendly, and willing to do most everything. I wanted to point out that it's no surprise that he's getting feedback complaining about the NDB scene and about him being straight. His "career" has played out like a textbook g4p case. He seemed surprised people thought he was straight which to me would be the logical assumption.

I like him. I thought his scene on CocksureMen was really good. I would like to see him in more GAY scenes. My issue is not with him per se.

 

[slnattak]

Can't he just be a cute guy? Do we have to go to into another neurotic straight/gay debate? lol.

Why can't you just go 'Wow that man is really attractive!' without obsessing over his actual sexuality? It's not like you'd get a chance with him anyway. Most porn models are narcissists in love with themselves, they could never return affections.

As a gay man, it would be nice if the it boy (rather than a manufactured it boy) were an actual gay man for once.

Porn is not real life. I'm an actual gay man. I don't have a porn star body at all, but I am VERY cute. I guess I'll get really buff so you will pay attention to me and stop your silly crushes on narcissistic porn models who couldn't ever return your heart lol.

 

[slnattak]

His gay scene on cocksuremen was really good, but because of all the lies that go on in gp about sexual identity, I don't believe for one second he's bisexual. I also doubt he'd be the new "it" boy if he were gay. Few people would have paid him any attention. I say that I because I follow a lot of the people who went nuts for him and I remember what they initially tweeted.

I think you have it backwards, my friend. He's not going to be the it boy, precisely because he's so ambivalent and slow suicide 'group home ish' bi-ish cute like a lot of gay porn models these days. He really doesn't have the right presence to be the next gay porn megastar, you know what I mean? He's hot but still too 'average' in a way I can't put my finger on... being a hit gay porn model, requires one to be more 'striking' than that.

But IMO the spiritual thrill of gay porn died out somewhere in 1998.

 

[cmlei70]

Noctambule, I see what you're saying, but personal attacks are going to happen in any visual industry. That's why so many actresses are so thin.

I'd say most of the anger over performer's sexual identity is brought on by the industry. Most gp4ers will eventually insult gay sex and make a point of saying how much they don't enjoy gay sex. It may not be as extreme as Malachi Marx's remarks, but it always happens. Look at what happened with Marx. He repeatedly insults gay sex, gay performers, and gay fans, and Randy Blue continues to hire him. This is an industry aimed at gay men yet people like Marx continue to be hired. Any wonder people get pissed off?

Most (not all but most) porn actors who claim to be bi are straight men who might learn to like gay sex, but they're straight identified and basically straight. Lost count of the number of interviews and BTS footage where so-called bisexuals can only get it up by watching straight porn.

You have g4pers who don't want criticism so they're bi. There's a performer (who I like BTW) who started off as straight, but when he got heat for being a g4per, he suddenly became bi overnight even though the studio he worked for claimed the whole time he was gay.

Vince Ferelli btw has made it clear that he's straight although he's willing to try things. Whether you believe him or not is up to the individual.

A lot of people say labels don't matter, but they really do. If labels weren't important, Chi Chi Larue would not have said the straight (or now bi) performer was gay. G4pers would not go out of their way not to be seen as straight: "sexualist" "just like sex." O'Toole would not have been bothered that people thought he was straight after his NDB scene. The industry cares deeply about labels, but doesn't want the viewers to care.

As someone who pays for all of his porn, I want to support gay men. I want to support great gay performers. I'm not turned on by seeing a performer having straight sex. It's a turn off, and it makes it harder for me to get off knowing he'd rather be fucking a woman or that he does fuck a woman. It's not that I want to get with these men in real life. It's that my turn on is a gay man. As much as I like O'Toole and as much as I like his willingness to please, the fact that he does do straight scenes, and that the photos are plastered EVERYWHERE, it makes harder for me to be turned on by him. There are gay men who like straight men. There are gay men who like watching straight sex. I'm not one of them, and I wish gp would not always cater to those men. I wish they'd cater to me every so often.

 

[Piquechampion]

Noctambule, I see what you're saying, but personal attacks are going to happen in any visual industry. That's why so many actresses are so thin.

I'd say most of the anger over performer's sexual identity is brought on by the industry. Most gp4ers will eventually insult gay sex and make a point of saying how much they don't enjoy gay sex. It may not be as extreme as Malachi Marx's remarks, but it always happens. Look at what happened with Marx. He repeatedly insults gay sex, gay performers, and gay fans, and Randy Blue continues to hire him. This is an industry aimed at gay men yet people like Marx continue to be hired. Any wonder people get pissed off?

Most (not all but most) porn actors who claim to be bi are straight men who might learn to like gay sex, but they're straight identified and basically straight. Lost count of the number of interviews and BTS footage where so-called bisexuals can only get it up by watching straight porn.

You have g4pers who don't want criticism so they're bi. There's a performer (who I like BTW) who started off as straight, but when he got heat for being a g4per, he suddenly became bi overnight even though the studio he worked for claimed the whole time he was gay.

Vince Ferelli btw has made it clear that he's straight although he's willing to try things. Whether you believe him or not is up to the individual.

A lot of people say labels don't matter, but they really do. If labels weren't important, Chi Chi Larue would not have said the straight (or now bi) performer was gay. G4pers would not go out of their way not to be seen as straight: "sexualist" "just like sex." O'Toole would not have been bothered that people thought he was straight after his NDB scene. The industry cares deeply about labels, but doesn't want the viewers to care.

As someone who pays for all of his porn, I want to support gay men. I want to support great gay performers. I'm not turned on by seeing a performer having straight sex. It's a turn off, and it makes it harder for me to get off knowing he'd rather be fucking a woman or that he does fuck a woman. It's not that I want to get with these men in real life. It's that my turn on is a gay man. As much as I like O'Toole and as much as I like his willingness to please, the fact that he does do straight scenes, and that the photos are plastered EVERYWHERE, it makes harder for me to be turned on by him. There are gay men who like straight men. There are gay men who like watching straight sex. I'm not one of them, and I wish gp would not always cater to those men. I wish they'd cater to me every so often.

Who is that performer????