The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Sarah Palin Wanted to Have Levi Johnston's Baby

justapixel

JUB Addict
Banned
Joined
Sep 7, 2008
Posts
1,800
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Another Misleading headline. Surprise. Surpise.

Headline should be "Sarah Palins wants to raise her daughters baby" not have her daughters baby.
 
Who in their right mind would believe anything that Kathy Griffin's airhead boy toy, Levi Johnston says?
 
Who in their right mind would believe anything that Kathy Griffin's airhead boy toy, Levi Johnston says?

The boy toy has learned (not really his strong suit) that if he works at it he can maybe extend his fifteen minutes to twenty. Who can blame him is young and naive and easily manipulated. His story cannot be proven nor disproven. It is his word against hers. The libs will believe him the conservatives will believe her. It is interesting how much attention she garners almost a year after the election. This obsession the left has with her indicates she is a bigger threat than they are willing to admit and their version of the politics of personal destruction is alive and well.

The deliberately misleading subject line is reflective of the original poster who recently admitted that is fine with hypocrites as long as they benefit liberals, (Mass changing law to all governor to appoint replacement). Lack of principle is unattractive regardless of party affiliation.
 
Clearly Bristol. When Levi said, "Oh course I won't shoot in your snatch," she believed it.

She was a 17-year-old schoolgirl whom, I think you would agree, used poor judgement in getting involved with Levi Johnston.

As for Levi Johnston, it seems that he likes being in the limelight, but having nothing of his own to expound, the only way he's been able to do it is to bring up issues with the Palin family. All of his badmouthing of the Palin family is eventually going to blow up in his face, just as it did with Jessie Griffin and his rumor about the Palin divorce.

I think eventually Kathy Griffin will eventually tire of him and he'll find someone else to latch onto.
 
And we know which camp you follow. :rolleyes:



Actually, everyone I know is PRAYING for Palin to run, dontchaknow. Oh, she's probably no crazier than any other Republican, which really isn't saying mich, but it is her arrogance and her "dumber than shit" stupidity that's just so appealing.



1. Kooky Palin asked Johnston if he would "let me have" the child. Now, solera1, here's a challenge, and it's a tuffy: what does the work "have " mean? How is it defined? It is defined as "To be in possession of." So, if Palin were to take possession of Levy's child, she would "have" his child. Capiche? Comprende? Get it?

2. I know this is hard for you, but how about trying to get your story straight, m'kay? M'kay, hon? I said, "Is it hypocritical to change that law now? Yep. Should they do it? Yep." Now, I know that's terribly nuanced for ya, but intelligent people will know what I was saying.

I am not as you insinuate unintelligent. I understand nuance just fine. I also understand when hypocrisy is being advocated since you like the outcome. The law should not be changed willy nilly back and forth depending on whether you like the party of the chief executive. This is petty political gaming at it's finest.
 
And I thought I wouldn't want to hear about her ever again. Now THIS is what I call entertainment! He talks about a whole lot more than this too. :corn:

It's so Jerry Springer. Almost like a bad car wreck...you know it's ugly but you can't help but look. :rotflmao:

I am so becoming a big fan of Levi's. The only thing that would make this perfect is if he said he's gay. :cool:

Levi sure is cute

but that's extent of his good points
 
Levi sure is cute

but that's extent of his good points

If you think Levi is cute, you should see his younger brother Jordache. The youngest brother Diesel is a bit of a twat though.
 
You're so right. He's got sexy dark looks. Once that mouth starts to speak you're already bored. I hope for him that he has "other talents" ;)

His baby making equipment seems to be in good order. If he hadn't stuck his dick in the right hole nobody would have heard of him.
 
...here's to you Mrs. Robinson, Jesus loves you more than you will know....
 
:eek:

I saw this on a car on the next block.

I think they were serious.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Keep_The_Change_1.jpg
    Keep_The_Change_1.jpg
    91.4 KB · Views: 216
I am not as you insinuate unintelligent. I understand nuance just fine. I also understand when hypocrisy is being advocated since you like the outcome. The law should not be changed willy nilly back and forth depending on whether you like the party of the chief executive. This is petty political gaming at it's finest.

Yawn on Sarah Palin and Levi Johnson (unless he displays his johnson).

GASP! I agree with Solara on the rest. I hate that Kennedy's seat will sit vacant until January, but that's the law. Massachusetts should change the law, but to take effect after the special election to fill Kennedy's seat. Solara, you should start a new thread on this topic. It will likely be the only time we're on the same side.
 
GASP! I agree with Solara on the rest. I hate that Kennedy's seat will sit vacant until January, but that's the law.

Ted Kennedy asked for the law to be changed in 2004 when he thought Kerry would win the White House.

Blame Teddy for the empty seat.
 
Noppers.... no trashy wingnut, trenchcoat-type Larry Craig type Republican here..... just a cock suckin', butt fuckin', 110% homosexual-type American liberal Democrat, who likes his men!

Thankee, doll face.:kiss:

and may I add...... 01solara, NedNickerson, and especially justapixel..... you guys gotta lighten up a bit. Have some fun! Check out the porn area..... lots of pics to jack off to!



Duly noted, I can only speak for myself. I am a very light hearted guy in the real world and checking out the porn and jerking off is how I came across this site probably much like everyone else. Our current economy and political system are in grave condition right now. If I jerked off enough to forget about it I would not do anything else.
 
But then we wouldn't have much to talk about. lol


Levi's shock value is just about run it's course. He better start stripping if he plans on staying in the limelight.
 
I dislike Sarah Palin, and her appeals to ignorance, abhor her politics and am alarmed that so many people would still like to see her run for higher office.

On the other hand, all joking aside, I do find the Vanity Fair article (which I haven't read), to be a sorry excuse for journalism. Who cares what Levi Johnston has to say? The man is obviously a dim wit. I have no reason to believe he has accurately portrayed what went on in the Palin household, indeed he has every reason to exaggerate (i.e. to keep himself in the limelight). It seems to me this story sheds little light on Sarah Palin's politics, does nothing to advance the debate on any public policy issue and generally contributes to the coarsening of civil society. It's a silly, puff celebrity piece (feel free, anyone who has read it, to correct me) that is better off ignored.

I would prefer a political culture that, as much as possible, ignored candidates families. After all, as much as I dislike Palin's politics, I dislike the intense focus on her family. After all, she has four children still at home, only one of whom is (barely) an adult. They never asked for this attention. I have no desire to contribute to their misery, which must be considerable these days.
 
I agree with you elvin1, I don't find him particularly sexy either. He is a cutie, and he knows it. He has a good smile, if not a devilish smile. I guess that is what got him in the fatherly way to begin with. I bet he drops his pants by December, but I am not sure if he will show his junk or not. He cares only about money right now. Soon he will be a footnote, and he could a richer footnote if he smiles when shows his butt.
 
Back
Top