The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Some things to know about this forum:
    If you're new, please read the Posting Guidelines. Banned content is in "List of Content Never Allowed on JUB".
    The most important thing to know: images of persons under 18 years old are never allowed here. If you cannot verify that the person in the picture is 18 years or older, don't post it.

Sean Cody update thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I actually don't mind solos-- as long as I like the models, of course. Dan and Josh were great to watch.

I think SC is very lucky to have someone as stunning as Mitch on board. I just wish they'd pair him off with someone equally hot, like Dan, instead of gormless Jake.
 
Needs some help - I'm tryi8ng to ID two Viods from SC ...

1) starts out with a hot blond sitting on a bed with a guy who almost polooks like Gabe from CF - they start out bus discussing "Montral is a great city" anmd then they go to a hot session - can't remember who the ;players" are or what vid it is ..

2) another one is an orgy type film with about 6 guys, and I remember some of the guys wearing white and black party masks while in bed.

Any help is appreciated ...
 
Hopefully they'll pair Dan up with someone equally hot, and it's not gonna be the extremely average looking in every way Mitch. They should bring Danny back to get it on with Danny. Now HE was hot. Mitch can't compare.


It's okay if you don't like him -- after all, it would be a boring world if we all liked the same types, but no way is Mitch "average looking". He has the classic chiseled good looks of a movie star.

However, I do agree with you about Dan & Danny -- that would be an awesome pairing. *|*
 
He's trying to compete with Corbin Fisher's low standards. He has Mitch, Curtis, and Trey on the schedule for 9 times each over the next three months.
Are you serious? How do you know?

Agreed somewhat on Corbin. It's the same recycled bullshit over there. Every time there's update you're like "Didnt I see this pairing already?" And the only new guys they ever get back for gay action are the ugly ones with shitty haircuts.

Also I'm gonna have to jump on the Mitch love train. He is hot to me. I think a lot of people, not saying you necessarily, have close-minded taste. It's like if they dont fit people's ideal of beauty physically or racially they are ugly. I consider myself open-minded. I do like slightly bigger guys like Mitch and Curtis and Trey much more than guys like Jake. But I still think Jake is an attractive guy if you like that type. But I like Shane and Todd (who sadly doesnt seem like he will return) a lot.
 
Add me to the "have Mitch be the first pairing for Dan" list. They even look alike so they can do a big brother/little brother roleplay.
 
It's okay if you don't like him -- after all, it would be a boring world if we all liked the same types, but no way is Mitch "average looking". He has the classic chiseled good looks of a movie star.

Yeah, he's average looking. Name one A-List star who looks remotely like Mitch. Like I said, Mitch's appeal is not that he is a drop-dead gorgeous man, but it's the fantasy of a big, muscular guy who loves to bottom; I am not saying that he is hideous, but he looks like a football player or a rugby player. He is far from a movie star, get over that.
 
I think Mitch resembles Eric Dane from Grey's Anatomy. The first time I saw him I thought, McSteamy!
 
Yeah, he's average looking. Name one A-List star who looks remotely like Mitch. Like I said, Mitch's appeal is not that he is a drop-dead gorgeous man, but it's the fantasy of a big, muscular guy who loves to bottom; I am not saying that he is hideous, but he looks like a football player or a rugby player. He is far from a movie star, get over that.


I can assure you that there are plenty of football/rugby players that are drop-dead gorgeous. It seems that you think any big man with muscle on his bones cannot possibly be handsome. I would still consider Mitch stunning looking even if he had a slim body.

I didn't say he resembles a well-known movie star -- I said he has the looks of a movie star. In any case, I cannot compare him with any current A-list actors because there's not a single one that I find remotely attractive -- not even Brad Pitt.
 
I can assure you that there are plenty of football/rugby players that are drop-dead gorgeous. It seems that you think any big man with muscle on his bones cannot possibly be handsome. I would still consider Mitch stunning looking even if he had a slim body.

Um, no. If Mitch is attractive to you, he's attractive to you. However, his looks are common. His looks are not anything special or anything universal. I'm not even talking about his body type, but I'm talking about his face.

I didn't say he resembles a well-known movie star -- I said he has the looks of a movie star. In any case, I cannot compare him with any current A-list actors because there's not a single one that I find remotely attractive -- not even Brad Pitt.

It's not about personal preference. I understood what you said clearly, but you misunderstood what I am saying. The reason that you cannot compare Mitch to a movie star is that a guy like Mitch would never chosen to be a leading man. He would not get lead roles based off his looks. There's a difference between wanting him to be a movie star and his realistically being a star (if he had decided to pursue that).

If you do not find a Brad Pitt type of guy attractive, fine. That's not an issue for me, but Brad Pitt still fit cultural standards of attractiveness as well as universal standards when he began. Most men who are actors begin as commercial or high-fashion models. Mitch is just another guy.
 
Um, no. If Mitch is attractive to you, he's attractive to you. However, his looks are common. His looks are not anything special or anything universal. I'm not even talking about his body type, but I'm talking about his face.



It's not about personal preference. I understood what you said clearly, but you misunderstood what I am saying. The reason that you cannot compare Mitch to a movie star is that a guy like Mitch would never chosen to be a leading man. He would not get lead roles based off his looks. There's a difference between wanting him to be a movie star and his realistically being a star (if he had decided to pursue that).

If you do not find a Brad Pitt type of guy attractive, fine. That's not an issue for me, but Brad Pitt still fit cultural standards of attractiveness as well as universal standards when he began. Most men who are actors begin as commercial or high-fashion models. Mitch is just another guy.


Mitch is definitely not common looking. He has a strong jawline and his face is very well proportioned -- a sign of good looks and definitely leading man material.

You don't like him -- fine. You are in a tiny minority. The majority here think he's hot.

Mitch is a very attractive, straight-looking mascular guy who performs well and is willing to give and take it in front of the camera -- what's not to like? *|*
 
Yeah, he's average looking. Name one A-List star who looks remotely like Mitch. Like I said, Mitch's appeal is not that he is a drop-dead gorgeous man, but it's the fantasy of a big, muscular guy who loves to bottom; I am not saying that he is hideous, but he looks like a football player or a rugby player. He is far from a movie star, get over that.

Wow James, It's great to know that A-list stars are now the benchmark, the bar, the standard that one must achieve in order to be considered good looking. Aim for the sky kids! These are your choices .. look like crazypants tom cruise or you're basically average (at best) / a society mutant (at worst)! That is absolutely not sad, narrow minded and tragically superficial!! not at all!

And you know what is else is amazing? your ability to get into every other posters' brain and analyze with exact precision why and how they might or might not find someone attractive. It couldn't possibly be that they just happen to have a different taste and opinion as you do, now can it James?
 
Are you serious? How do you know?

Agreed somewhat on Corbin. It's the same recycled bullshit over there. Every time there's update you're like "Didnt I see this pairing already?" And the only new guys they ever get back for gay action are the ugly ones with shitty haircuts.

Also I'm gonna have to jump on the Mitch love train. He is hot to me. I think a lot of people, not saying you necessarily, have close-minded taste. It's like if they dont fit people's ideal of beauty physically or racially they are ugly. I consider myself open-minded. I do like slightly bigger guys like Mitch and Curtis and Trey much more than guys like Jake. But I still think Jake is an attractive guy if you like that type. But I like Shane and Todd (who sadly doesnt seem like he will return) a lot.


Just watched the Mitch video, I dont know what it is about him he's fine and all but he seems like he would be good buddy to hang out with.
 
Mitch is definitely not common looking. He has a strong jawline and his face is very well proportioned -- a sign of good looks and definitely leading man material.

You don't like him -- fine. You are in a tiny minority. The majority here think he's hot.

Mitch is a very attractive, straight-looking mascular guy who performs well and is willing to give and take it in front of the camera -- what's not to like? *|*

Leading man in porn? Yes. Leading man in Hollywood? No. Porn model is not interchangeable with mainstream model. They are two different looks. The reason that I bring up mainstream modeling is many of them are assigned lead acting roles based off their look; Mitch has a different kind of look. Period.

There are plenty of men on Sean Cody as well as other sites that I personally like. That does not mean I think they should model in areas outside of porn. I honestly do not care about being in a tiny minority when it comes to Mitch. I never said he's ugly or hideous, but he is just another guy. I've seen plenty of guys who look like him.

Wow James, It's great to know that A-list stars are now the benchmark, the bar, the standard that one must achieve in order to be considered good looking. Aim for the sky kids! These are your choices .. look like crazypants tom cruise or you're basically average (at best) / a society mutant (at worst)! That is absolutely not sad, narrow minded and tragically superficial!! not at all!

And you know what is else is amazing? your ability to get into every other posters' brain and analyze with exact precision why and how they might or might not find someone attractive. It couldn't possibly be that they just happen to have a different taste and opinion as you do, now can it James?

I believe I said in my previous posts that having different preferences are fine, even though I did not phrase in such a manner. With that being said, my point is that even though Mitch may be attractive to you or someone else, that does not mean he has movie star looks. In other words, porn companies and mainstream movie studios have different standards.

Furthermore, I never made an attempt to analyze why anyone found Mitch attractive. I simply said that I did find him attractive; I never personally insulted anyone else for finding him attractive. So, uh, anything else?

The new guys Dominic isn't bad looking, but he really looks older than 23 to me for some reason. He kind of reminds me of Joe, but he was 30 and kind of unattractive. He made a good bottom slut for Addison though. Seeing Addison pull his legs back and fuck him was the hottest thing ever.

You know, I was thinking the same thing when I looked at Dominic. He looks good, but 23? I would hate to see what 10 years would do to him.
 
I see SC is still behind on updates. I bet when there finallly is a new update it's gonna be that ugly ass butterface guy from Russia with that tacky slicked back hair.
 
Or Mitch or Trey or Curtis again. Sigh...

SC was fucking awesome not too long ago around the time Owen, Devin, and Harley were around. And even before that when Danny, Rodney and Billy were there. But lately it's been really disappointing. Still prefer it to CF, though, because even if the models suck at least SC has more hot and interesting sex positions and camera angles than CF ever does.

I dont mind Mitch but it is too early to see him again. I wouldnt mind seeing Trey plowed by Shane tbh. Shane's last appearance was a waste b/c of his partner imo.
Also I think Trey and Curtis are on their way out if they havent already. SC doesnt keep guys forever. He pretty much gets as many scenes as possible out of them and that's pretty much it. He keep good tops around like Harley and Parker as long as they are willing. I think it is harder to find a good top is all. But yea SC sex is the best. My roommate has College Dudes 247 and their scenes are really hot too. Their models however are not the hottest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top