The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Sen. Clinton in RI mocks Sen. Obama

If you dont know the differences in a Bush presidency and what a Obama presidency would look like, no wonder none of your posts make a lick of sense here.

I don't think anyone knows what an Obama Presidency would look like - care to tell us?
 
The problem is there is no indication that Obama knows much about getting anything done. If he is elected the Republicans will be licking their chops waiting to roll him

I might point out here that Bill Clinton was rolled by the republicans when he arrived in Washington as was his wife and her healthcare plan. One presumes they have learned and that she would be....uhmm ready on day 1.......but who can say for sure. Mrs. Clinton's political touch is anything but deft.

Its very possible that you're right iman and Obama will get rolled. If he does its as likely to be because of attitude developed from the adulation of the campaign as it is because of a lack of experience.

And it may not just be republicans he need worry about. Congressional democrats are usually not as agreeable as congressional republicans no matter which party controls the WH.


iman said:
and he is not that popular among many Dems and not well liked in the Senate.

Evidently he is popular enough.
 
I deny the assertion, mainly because you have no fact (regardless of saying that it is "the fact") to back this up. If you care to substantiate this claim, you have the right to do it. Otherwise, there is no 'fact' to deny.

Umm, if you read the history books, you will find a lot of facts there. However, no one except Hillary herself and the people closest to her know the nature and scope of experience she accumulated while she lived in the White House as the wife of a two-term president.
 
Originally Posted by tmb1
If you dont know the differences in a Bush presidency and what a Obama presidency would look like, no wonder none of your posts make a lick of sense here.


I don't think anyone knows what an Obama Presidency would look like - care to tell us?

Please, tell me what an Obama Presidency would look like!
 
However, no one except Hillary herself and the people closest to her know the nature and scope of experience she accumulated while she lived in the White House as the wife of a two-term president.

Huh? Clinton is running on experience. If that's what she's running on, the job of her campaign is to explain that experience to us. If we don't know what to make of her years as first lady, that's no one's fault but hers.

But I know exactly what to make of her experience in the Senate, and it comes down to the vote to authorize the use of force. Sure, only one vote, but the most important one in the Senate since the Gulf of Tonkin. And despite her vast experience, she got that one dead wrong.
 
Back
Top