Sexy, arty, unconventional PICS

[ShihTzuTylenol]

nice set of shots STT!

I especially like the Limo and Quarry ones. Limo one !

The Boy's @ Quarry is a cool composition...I wonder if it was spontaneous or composed? Love the old world mixed with new/graffiti, well placed nudes...has the feel of a modern Raphael.

The guy jumping off with his suit around his ankles...

I LOOOOVE Raphael's work, and he's my favorite Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle too

Oh eJ, you are magnificent girl, I love your taste in art.

...so bold and vulgar, yet somehow irresistibly alluringgood job hon.

 

[EJMichaels]

Thanks, STT, it means a lot to get feedback from you. And weren't you the one that directed me to Artistry of Male? I love that site.

To everyone - shameless plug unrelated to this thread:
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=327072;p=6666668

 

[JetSetJake]

Re: Let's face the facts

No. Because Richard Lloyd has the prettiest face in this thread.

And because you are no regular visitor of cultural demanding themes, honey...

Well, firstly, having a pretty face doesn't make somebody sexy; having a pretty face isn't arty (unless something is done to the representation of the face); nor is having a pretty face unconventional. Therefore, the title of the thread: "Sexy, arty and unconventional pics", is the reason for my comment, not the fact that I disagreed with the attractiveness of the guy.

Secondly, the correct word you're looking for is "culturally", and not "cultural". So if you're going to try to insult somebody, you should first of all be able to do it correctly, and second of all, you should know what you're talking about.

 

[HugoB]

.....you should first of all be able to do it correctly....

Da liegst du vollkommen richtig, mein guter Jake.

Im Zweifel sollte man stets in der Sprache schmähen,
die man am besten beherrscht.

...you should know what you're talking about....

So isses. Mit Verlaub: hier habe ich bei dir gewisse Zweifel. Denn...

the title of the thread: "Sexy, arty and unconventional pics",

...the second picture of Richard Lloyd was without doubt not conventional, Companero.

´

 

[JetSetJake]

Da liegst du vollkommen richtig, mein guter Jake.
Im Zweifel sollte man stets in der Sprache schmähen,
die man am besten beherrscht.
So isses. Mit Verlaub: hier habe ich bei dir gewisse Zweifel. Denn...
...the second picture of Richard Lloyd was without doubt not conventional, Companero.

Regarding your comment on cultural topics (and subsequently my comment on knowing what you're talking about): this is a picture thread, so culture isn't the main issue but rather aesthetics is.

 

[Lefty]

Jake,

Not everyone here will adhere to the standard you and I attributed to
this thread. Suck it up dude, ain't gonna happen....some cheesecake is
in the Sexy definition...us gotta be on the team buddy.

However I will not expect you to collate, assimilate, translate, or tolerate
those people who prove they lack taste or discretion and do it in a bi-lingual
as well.

Youngish "Tzu" and the evocative wordsmith "eJ" belong within the bosom of
our close knit "Team" unlike just any common joe blo, they have displayed a
soupcon of taste and integrity.

EH?

 

[HugoB]

I will not expect you to ...tolerate those people who prove they lack taste...

Questions of taste you could never discuss with
in Germany so called 'Mainstreammolchen', Muchacho.



But okay. Let's forget it. Schwamm drüber.


Once again back to the mid-seventies in NY. To the Bowery and the
golden days of the legendary CBGB's - 'The House of the Rising Punk'.


Richard Hell and the Voidoits.... very conventional...
´

 

[JetSetJake]

Jake,

Not everyone here will adhere to the standard you and I attributed to
this thread. Suck it up dude, ain't gonna happen....some cheesecake is
in the Sexy definition...us gotta be on the team buddy.

However I will not expect you to collate, assimilate, translate, or tolerate
those people who prove they lack taste or discretion and do it in a bi-lingual
as well.

Youngish "Tzu" and the evocative wordsmith "eJ" belong within the bosom of
our close knit "Team" unlike just any common joe blo, they have displayed a
soupcon of taste and integrity.

EH?

Yes, you're right, Lefty.

The most recent spat was started after I made an innocent comment about a post (based on both the pics and the accompanying text), then the OP of that post decided to make it personal.

I know I shouldn't rise to it, but I refuse to let people get personal without riposte.

I agree with your comments about Tzu and eJ. They've posted some great shots!

 

[EJMichaels]

After getting such nice comments , I hope this pic isn't too weird:

Or these might be better. . .

 

[Telstra]

nice pics to look at

 

[CowboyBob]

 

[HugoB]

The most recent spat was started after....

No. Not the most recent spat. The only one so far.

You mixed up things again, honey.


But even worser: you're three pics behind....

After getting such nice comments , I hope this pic isn't too weird...

By no means. Especially the stylish wine bottles in the background reveal an exceptional taste...

´

 

[JetSetJake]

No. Not the most recent spat. The only one so far.

You mixed up things again, honey.

Like I said - you should know what you're talking about before coming out with utter rubbish.

It is in fact the most recent spat, as if you'd looked through this thread to see what it was about, you'd know that there have been similar discussions/disagreements before about what constitutes adherence to the theme of the thread and its title.

Clearly you're just looking to cause trouble, so I'll just ignore your drivel.

 

[HugoB]

Clearly you're just looking to cause trouble, so I'll just ignore your drivel.

Okay - so let's say: our only spat so far.


But now you're four pics behind.

Talkin' about quality & taste...




PS:

At JUB you need to have balls, buster...´
´

 

[EJMichaels]

I guess I'm still thinking about food. . .

 

[jerome66]

 

[EJMichaels]

Great pics, jerome. I was going to post some bondage-themed pics today, but got distracted by another page.

Oh, wait, I found them again:

(Is it too early for Christmas?)

 

[HugoB]

´


David Bowie on stage - in his Ziggy Stardust days, 1972/73

´

 

[Lefty]

Baroloboy

Jake (buster???) has Balls. He also has a modicum of taste and refinement.

And the good sense to know what threads his offerings should conjoin.

It is not my intention to make you feel unwanted or to disabuse your

offerings.

The title of this thread uses the four words to identify its ambition and as

identification to the viewer. Your submissions do not meet the criteria of

sexy, arty or unconventional. You did quite well on "PICS" but we actually

desire more than a 25% targeted adherence compliance for submissions.

Your submissions would do better in a separate thread designed for those

aficionados of the crass vulgar commercialism in photography.

Yes, this is only one opinion and like the one asshole I am entitled to, I

intend to use both.

Exploitation of and feeding the masses examples of truly tasteless things

is more a news media advertising schtick. Perhaps a niche could be found

for your genre in the Celebrity or Fetish forums?

 

[HugoB]

Your submissions do not meet the criteria of

sexy, arty or unconventional.

You said it more or less: a matter of opinion.


For me - the Ziggy Stardust stage photos and the
Lilies-images for example are very sexy & stylish.


But as already declared:

It's impossible to discuss questions of taste & style
with - excuse my German - "Mainstreammolchen".


And besides: you're also some pics behind.

Talkin' about convincing pictures, pastore...




The backside of Mick Jagger in the mid-eighties:

(Okay - men in tights should indeed be banned to the fetish-forum... )
´