NotHardUp1
What? Me? Really?
An Alabama man who lived an hour from me was vacationing in the Fllorida panhandle when he became ill. At the hospital, he was advised he must undergo an emergency splenectomy.
(Mr. Bryan, his wife, and his surgeon in the inset)
During the surgery, his surgeon removed his liver instead, killing him via instant hemorrhaging. Even after removing the liver, the surgeon proceeded to label it as the spleen.
A subsequent autopsy found the spleen intact and the liver missing.
www.pnj.com
Despite the media's insipid use of "alleged" to describe events and actions, rather than only to describe crimes or intent, the malpractice is unambiguosly true. Dr. Shaknovsky did remove the liver in error.
Sadly, the good doctor removed part of a patient's pancreas just last year in error, believing it to be an adrenal gland.
The absurdity of the case would lead one to conclude that it is so rare as to be a freak occurrence statistically, yet the Pensacola News Journal article referenced a Johns Hopkins study that indicates it is not as rare as we'd suppose. Arguably, the incidence may be even higher when one considers how many surgeons may be able to cover up bungles when operating in less-policed hospitals
Without a doubt, the hospital and the surgeon will settle civil suits for many millions, but does that address the criminal negligence? After all, no one went to prison for the Deepwater Horizon event, and only a handful of Indians served two-year sentences for the Bhopal disaster.
What should be the liability of medical professionals? They save many lives. But, do they still have to meet justice if they take one through incompetence?
(Mr. Bryan, his wife, and his surgeon in the inset)
During the surgery, his surgeon removed his liver instead, killing him via instant hemorrhaging. Even after removing the liver, the surgeon proceeded to label it as the spleen.
A subsequent autopsy found the spleen intact and the liver missing.
Man dies after liver removed instead of spleen. It happens more often than you think. What to know
A Johns Hopkins study found a surgeon performs the wrong procedure on a patient 20 times a week and operates on the wrong body site 20 times a week.
Despite the media's insipid use of "alleged" to describe events and actions, rather than only to describe crimes or intent, the malpractice is unambiguosly true. Dr. Shaknovsky did remove the liver in error.
Sadly, the good doctor removed part of a patient's pancreas just last year in error, believing it to be an adrenal gland.
The absurdity of the case would lead one to conclude that it is so rare as to be a freak occurrence statistically, yet the Pensacola News Journal article referenced a Johns Hopkins study that indicates it is not as rare as we'd suppose. Arguably, the incidence may be even higher when one considers how many surgeons may be able to cover up bungles when operating in less-policed hospitals
Without a doubt, the hospital and the surgeon will settle civil suits for many millions, but does that address the criminal negligence? After all, no one went to prison for the Deepwater Horizon event, and only a handful of Indians served two-year sentences for the Bhopal disaster.
What should be the liability of medical professionals? They save many lives. But, do they still have to meet justice if they take one through incompetence?

