The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Should Water be Free?

EddMarkStarr

JUB Addict
JUB Supporter
Joined
Aug 30, 2015
Posts
6,011
Reaction score
1,306
Points
113
Location
Seattle
The western United States is heading for a water crisis and it looks like the USA is "easy pickins" for foreign governments looking for low cost/ free water.

Better get it while it lasts?

 
I was trying to figure this out and found it is not exporting water in tankers to Saudi Arabia, but instead growing hay in Arizona and exporting the hay to Saudi Arabia. I imagine that they could do this in any other open state but the desert land in Arizona was probably cheaper to buy.
 
I'm not generally for protectionism, but this is more a domestic fight, as there have been wars over water rights for centuries in North America.

My belief is not that water should be free, as it is a resource that requires a lot of infrastructure to deliver to the consumer, so a utility is perfectly reasonable to recover those costs rather than tax everyone for another's use.

However, I support the nationalization of water rights, due to the uneven distribution of populations in the Great West and the difficulty in ensuring a clean water supply there. That means states like Wisconsin, Minnesota, and others can sell thteir water and use a federal distribution system no different than the inteterstate highway system or the electrical grid.

The feds would also have final say as to the clearance for major industrial uses to have permits when opening a facility, weighing not only the environmental impacts, but the human population's relative needs. This would also apply to agricultural use.

I envision more a regulatory role rather than the federal govvernment owning the water. It should obviously be an office within the Department of the Interior.
 
Beefing up water rights is very important to Canada, as California has already tried to reach a distribution deal with British Columbia.
(as I recall, the BC boys smelled a rat, and the deal fell through)
 
Beefing up water rights is very important to Canada, as California has already tried to reach a distribution deal with British Columbia.
(as I recall, the BC boys smelled a rat, and the deal fell through)
Trump's recent ramblings about how Canada should turn on tsome imaginary huge tap to send water into the US is a reminder to Canadians that stupid politicians with no fucking clue about how watershed systems work will likely one day be the reason that the US invades Canada to get the water...or tears up the Great Lakes water management agreement that regulates how much water can be taken by each country.
 
Back
Top