The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

So advice from anyone who watches gay porn..

...the amateur, "actors are nervous, and the director's talking to them" scenes are much more "real" and hot to me, because they aren't trying to feed me this bullshit story with horrific acting; they're nervous, they're doing it for the money, and the director's telling them to do what's going to look hot on camera. Everything about that is true and real.

I think you are equating movies with scenes. IE: the difference between a production Falcon film and a 15-20min fuck scene from Jake Cruise or whatever.

When I've previous mentioned my enjoyment of acting in addition to story, I mean it in the context of movies that set out to deliver a scrip, storyline, etc.

However, I do agree that more 'realness' in scenes is desirable. I like that too. But when a production film gets a bunch of actors who are clearly professions that just suck at their jobs, than it is a real turn off: that kind of in-between "I'm a pro, I just can't act" vs. "I'm am armature and legitimately nervous".

So, to recap my opinion: acting professionals in film-based movies = good. Amateur in scenes acting like amateur = good. Professionals in film-based movies acting like amateur = bad.
 
I know what a cumming cock looks like. Sure, I want to see the money-shot, but not just the money-shot.

I prefer 'money-in-the-hole'. And with regard to your observation that there is more to an orgasm than a spewing dick, concentrate on the top's face as he unloads in the bottoms hole -- and then pulls out a rubber filled with his milky white lust! That's hot, IMHO!

Facial expressions and body interactions tell you much more about how good the sex is than endless shots of cock-in-the-butthole. Could be a loop, for all we know.
 
So in addition to my writing for a gay publication, I edit gay porn. Now my boss is gay and he loves my work, but as a straight guy I see everything in terms of technical aspects and really don't connect with the content....so for those who watch/use/enjoy/whatever gay porn, what do you like to see? What do you look for? What gets you into it? I'm humbly trying to create a more engaging product for the target audience.

On an semi related note....a gay porn inspired by the concepts of the Twilight series...good idea or bad idea?

Thanks everyone.

Oh really? Really?

I mean, REALLY?

It is like asking the tone deaf to tune the piano.

Or a blind man to choose colour combinations.

And you're str8.

Really?
 
This thread is why I don't ever ask for porn advice here.

First... he's an editor. Or so he says. And you're all giving him production and directing notes.

He can't get "better acting" or "less dialogue" or "more kissing."

By the time the editor gets the footage, it's too late to add "acting" or "kissing " or "dialogue."

what advice you can give the editor....

- try not to do those 3-minute static shots of a closeup of anything. It gets old.

- Try to cut back and forth between action and facial expression.

- don't edit out the talking.

- try to make a note of where people's hands, feet, body parts are... if you're cutting to a shot that was done 30 minutes later, if there's no continuity... people will notice.
 
ICAM PhunkSpunk! At least some of the money shots should be like that. It keeps the momentum building when the top doesn't have to break his rhythm to pull out, rip off the condom, and finish himself off.
Another thing that is really hot is if they finish each other off. That isn't done nearly enough, but it is incredibly hot. Maybe some of the guys can't finish off that way, but for those who can let 'em go for it!
 
Oh, and most of all... with threads like this you're just begging for bitter people to rag on porn with random "I hate it when..." comments.

By the time he gets involved, it's too late to fix the things most people are ragging about in this thread.
 
I definately like to see passionate sex, I love when the guys make out, especially when they're naked and rubbing their cocks together. Or after they just came, and make out oh so passionately, then just lay in each others arms.
Then off to the showers! I love after sex shower scenes, just see the guys naturally. You never know what will happen in the shower ;)

And about the twilight thing, haven't they already made one called "Twinklight"?
 
An where Princess Leia's accent keeps fading back and forth between pseudo-British and American... Yeah... Edit that out. It can definitely go.
 
This thread is why I don't ever ask for porn advice here.

First... he's an editor. Or so he says. And you're all giving him production and directing notes.

He can't get "better acting" or "less dialogue" or "more kissing."

By the time the editor gets the footage, it's too late to add "acting" or "kissing " or "dialogue."

what advice you can give the editor....

- try not to do those 3-minute static shots of a closeup of anything. It gets old.

- Try to cut back and forth between action and facial expression.

- don't edit out the talking.

- try to make a note of where people's hands, feet, body parts are... if you're cutting to a shot that was done 30 minutes later, if there's no continuity... people will notice.

This guy has it exactly rhe way I like it. Follow these instructions exactly. ALso I think its funny you k now his boss lol:cool: Twilight idea would be awesome especially if you got someone close to Taylor Lautner, but i don't wanna see a guy who looks like Edward.
 
About a Twilight-theme porn: I think they guy who plays Bella's daddy is a major turn-on lol. He's so sexy in a dark n silent way :">. And the fact that he's a dad just makes me hotter haha. I don't like Taylor. I just don't find him attractive, at all ==" (DON'T HATE ME PPL !!!). I like Jasper (what's his real name???) and Klutz. Their sexy but Klutz seems too arrogant in real life .. ==.
And I basically agree with what others have been saying about how to make porn better. More passionate kissing, more dirty talk lol, less music (PLEASE LOL), and less fking like a van-broken mindless cruel fk, they always make me feel pity for the bottoms, as if their the tops' hitbags..
 
I enjoy the classic vintage porn of William Higgins. Lots of action from sucking, to rimming to fucking and money shots.

Can do without the can music. When watch gay porn want to hear the guys talk and hear the sounds of sucking, rimming, fucking and see the cum on the face.
 
Thanks for all the feedback guys. Really I was looking for insight above all else and that's what you gave. I agree with the music aspect and glad we keep it short and at the front.

The kissing thing seems to be part of a larger issue all porn seems to miss the boat on. When you're having sex with someone, you're generally looking in their eyes, not staring at their asses. More facial reactions is something all porn should use more of. I freely admit the kissing in the work I do ads a passion that is generally lacking via the sex alone.

You're advice leads me to the notion of something that seems to be a problem with ALL porn. One camera shooting works, but it doesn't allow for much creative room in shooting. Really its a budget issue, but if two cameras were used it seems all porn could be improved.

While I have no control over acting and other such stuff, if I'm ever in a position on set and can make a difference, I will certainly try. Thanks.
 
Back
Top