To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Was reminded of this one today:
Along with this one:
The first song I became obsessed with was when I was four or five. It was a 7''orchestral instrumental of "Love Is Blue". I don't remember who recorded it but it was on the Phillips label, mid sixties.
Tom Lehrer, the prolific writer and singer of many humorous, satirical ballads, described Little Boxes as "the most sanctimonious song ever written." Sanctimonious it certain is, although "repulsive" is the word that first springs to my mind.
Little Boxes was written by Malvina Reynolds, who was a graduate student at the University of California campus in Berkeley at the time, having previously received an undergraduate degree there. The little boxes, all built of "ticky-tacky" and "all the same" she refers to are in Daly City, a working class and lower-middle-class suburb of San Francisco. Reynolds mischaracterizes the residents there as university graduates, doctors, lawyers and business executives who are also "all made of ticky-tacky" and also all look "just the same". They also play golf, like dry martinis, have pretty children who go to school, summer camp and the university and come out "all the same."
What she should have appreciated was that the Daly City residents were likely hard-working families of modest means who may very well have bought these modest houses with the help of the GI Bill. Few of them had university degrees, although many probably hoped their children would, imagining the opportunities they hoped the degree would bring.
As for the doctors, lawyers and business executives she disdains--well, they were probably living around the university campus in Berkeley, across the Golden Gate in Marin, or down the Peninsula in what is now Silicon Valley--in larger, more expensive houses, perhaps even beautiful houses. But how could she possibly know they were all the same? How could she possibly know the "content of their character?" Who was she to judge the very people whose taxes were helping subsidizing her university education? Whose endeavors--and those of the Daly City residents--helped make California the economic powerhouse that it was and is, and who might even have bought her recordings or attended her concerts. How pretentious of her and her ilk to imagine they knew these people, how despicable that they characterized them with such snobbery and disdain.
A vile song.
This?The first song I became obsessed with was when I was four or five. It was a 7''orchestral instrumental of "Love Is Blue". I don't remember who recorded it but it was on the Phillips label, mid sixties.
Are you sanctimoniously criticizing the song or the hermeneutics made over the song?Tom Lehrer, the prolific writer and singer of many humorous, satirical ballads, described Little Boxes as "the most sanctimonious song ever written." Sanctimonious it certain is, although "repulsive" is the word that first springs to my mind.
Little Boxes was written by Malvina Reynolds, who was a graduate student at the University of California campus in Berkeley at the time, having previously received an undergraduate degree there. The little boxes, all built of "ticky-tacky" and "all the same" she refers to are in Daly City, a working class and lower-middle-class suburb of San Francisco. Reynolds mischaracterizes the residents there as university graduates, doctors, lawyers and business executives who are also "all made of ticky-tacky" and also all look "just the same". They also play golf, like dry martinis, have pretty children who go to school, summer camp and the university and come out "all the same."
What she should have appreciated was that the Daly City residents were likely hard-working families of modest means who may very well have bought these modest houses with the help of the GI Bill. Few of them had university degrees, although many probably hoped their children would, imagining the opportunities they hoped the degree would bring.
As for the doctors, lawyers and business executives she disdains--well, they were probably living around the university campus in Berkeley, across the Golden Gate in Marin, or down the Peninsula in what is now Silicon Valley--in larger, more expensive houses, perhaps even beautiful houses. But how could she possibly know they were all the same? How could she possibly know the "content of their character?" Who was she to judge the very people whose taxes were helping subsidizing her university education? Whose endeavors--and those of the Daly City residents--helped make California the economic powerhouse that it was and is, and who might even have bought her recordings or attended her concerts. How pretentious of her and her ilk to imagine they knew these people, how despicable that they characterized them with such snobbery and disdain.
A vile song.
Ah, Vicky Leandros, the twenty-year-old teen...Would that be this one?
I loved that one! This is how I remember it, though:
I've no idea why, but I associate that with hiking through knee-deep snow.
This version I remember being played on the radio:
Conformism going so far as to criminal collaborationism or 'mere' criminal stand-offism...Are you sanctimoniously criticizing the song or the hermeneutics made over the song?
The lyrics do not address particular people as much as particular qualities, and whitewashing mediocrity, comformism, platitude because of the bovine toughness, meekness and guileless behind it might be consider just as much, when not more, "sanctimonious" and "repulsive".
At most, I could accept the "tragic condition" of the "little box" little people who are condemned to being used and abused in virtue precisely of the qualities they consider "right": aurea mediocritas being minted as whatever coin it is deemed more convenient when and where and how it is considered it must be done so.
Now you make me think of this tape I would listen constantly in my very early childhood...
![]()
![]()

Yes that's it. And here's the label:
View attachment 1828768
Oddly, seeing the label brought back more memories than hearing the song. I suspect I've listened to or heard it once or twice over the years. I used to have a fascination with record labels.
I found the piano version to be a little sad. I guess it's the timbre of the piano and how it transforms the lushness of the other versions into a delicate one. It'a a beautifully melodic song and I suspect my exposure to it at the beginning of my interest in music is why I have always enjoyed overly melodic music.Did you listen to the other versions I posted?
The final one, the meditative piano version, reminded me of a performance where the pianist played it with heavy shifting into minor chords, turning it into a tune so sad much of the audience was crying -- there are hints of that in this piano version. I wish I could find that performance online; it's a rare melody that can be either joyful or haunting and both be memorable.
Yes, seeing the label brought back memories. I used to think the label had something to do with the type of music on the record.BTW, I can understand the label thing: Looking through my parents' old vinyl brought back memories that hearing the songs doesn't --
like decorating the family Christmas tree, Thanksgiving dinner with my mom's siblings and their offspring around a table that extended from dining room to living room (and one to the side for the under-fourteen set), Fourth of July mornings when the mom would wake up the neighborhood with John Phillips Sousa marches blasting from indoor and outdoor speakers and eagerness to be up and awake and through with breakfast to be cranking the ice-cream maker (we made about six gallons of home-made), New Year's Day with some college football bowl game on the tube, summer outings to a beach estuary . . . .
Though yes, Bruce was prettier, and had the whole packageThe pretty things (yes, I was such a guileless dirty young perv):
Dat azz
Dat feiç
