The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Spider-Man 4 canned

YeahWhatever

JUB Addict
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Posts
1,386
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Irvine, CA
...and Sony is thinking of going the "reboot" route with a new cast and new director, supposedly based on Peter Parker's high school years. This sounds terrible! Does it make sense to reboot a film franchise that's not even 10 years old yet?

I tried re-watching SM3 a few weeks ago, and it was a lot worse than I remember. They should just kill the franchise now.
 
Probably a good idea. Tobey Maguire is getting a little too old to be playing Peter Parker. SM3 could have been good but they had too many villains and not enough story behind them. SM2 however was the best superhero film ever. I think I saw it 6 times.

Why not a film based on Peter Parker's high school years? It worked for Clark Kent.
 
I'm not sure how I feel about this yet...

A reboot doesn't really need to happen, even though Spiderman 3 sort of destroyed the good will made by the first two movies...Mainly through dancing emo-Peter Parker.

I don't think they need to go all the way back to Peter Parker in high school and reintroduce the origin story of getting bitten; after all, James Bond worked for quite a few movies before needing a reboot with Casino Royale.

Just give us the new Spiderman, with a good villain and story, minus the emo-look and dancing, and we shouldn't need to start all over again.
 
i think a reboot is premature.

the only reason the third movie was a stinker was the forced inclusion of venom. you can blame that on avi arad. the original treatment was only the sandman and you can see shades of what raimi was aiming at.
 
I'm not sure how I feel about this yet...

A reboot doesn't really need to happen, even though Spiderman 3 sort of destroyed the good will made by the first two movies...Mainly through dancing emo-Peter Parker.

I don't think they need to go all the way back to Peter Parker in high school and reintroduce the origin story of getting bitten; after all, James Bond worked for quite a few movies before needing a reboot with Casino Royale.

Just give us the new Spiderman, with a good villain and story, minus the emo-look and dancing, and we shouldn't need to start all over again.

Absolutely agree.
What a stupid and DREADFUL idea........ do we really need a new Spiderman1? GROSS! Just make Spiderman 4, and make it a solid movie, its much too soon and uncalled for to do a reboot. Batman NEEDED a reboot bc it was handled wrong in the 90's. Spider doesnt!
 
At least if they don't do Spiderman 4 we won't have to look at the horrible title: "Spiderm4n"

Ugh.

Anyway, I would actually rather they changed the cast - Tobey Maguire is awful - and I'm sure they could someone more attractive to play Peter Parker.

I didn't watch the movies after the first Spiderman so I'm not really bothered.
 
Watch the second one, at least. It's the best out of the three...definitely rivals the last Batman film in regards to quality. That's why a lot of people raged, I think...the third film didn't even compare to either of the first two.

It's too early for a reboot, but it would be nice to have the 'Batman treatment' a decade down the road.

Okay. I shall.

It has James Franco in it doesn't it?

That should be easy viewing - I didn't rate the Batman movie it was too long and I got bored.:badgrin:
 
Tobey & the Freaking Director walked out on the film because of "Creative differences"...Whatever......

Tobey Maguire IS "Spider Man"...Watch they replace him with Shia Labeouf....Shia is todays "IT" man..
 
^ Nah. If they're smart about it they'll cast an unknown actor.

This gives Raimi time to work on the Warcraft movie, though.

Or they can completely destroy the franchise and cast some twilight twit in it. Teenage angst FTL.

Yah being a crazy warcraft geek, I question how good the movie will actually be. As long as the plot doesn't revolve around "Mary Sue" Rhonin Redhair saving Azeroth from itself, I'll see it.
 
>>>Or they can completely destroy the franchise and cast some twilight twit in it. Teenage angst FTL

Oooh, there you go. Make Spiderman an emo vampire. :)

Lex
 
Tobey & the Freaking Director walked out on the film because of "Creative differences"...Whatever......

Tobey Maguire IS "Spider Man"...Watch they replace him with Shia Labeouf....Shia is todays "IT" man..

I never thought about Shia but thats something to think about. I liked the first movie but the last 2 kinda of sucked, I like the Xmen movies better. But atleast the last 2 Spidey movies werent as bad as the fuckred up Fantastic four.
 
If Jake Gyllenhaal was a better actor, I wouldn't mind him filling in Tobey's suit. I mean they look like they are related anyway. But reading the news of the crappy storyline that was in the works, and Raimi's demands for bad ass (Avatar worthy) CGI graphics, its whatever.

xaum3k.jpg

LOL ONTD
 
Back
Top