Str8 Guys Blowing Other Str8 Guys is a Bro-Blow, and apparently It’s NOT Gay…Thoughts and Opinions?

[ChickenGuy]

Interesting how, despite me readily dismissing all of this, I still find the 'bro-blow' concept attractive, NOT for me, but if two straight guys were doing it with each other.

Also interesting, how attractive the concept of that relaxed 'straight' guy was for me, at the end of the video.

Never expected it to be, so I immediately asked myself why.

The best answer I can give is that I wish *all* straight guys in this world could be as sexually relaxed and open and easygoing as is portrayed in that video, not just to gays, but also, maybe even more, amongst themselves.

That's not the same as self-delusion - I, like most, don't buy into all the contrived 'straight' porn narratives.

I suspect it comes from how, as teenagers, most of us (me included) had crushes on straight guys.

It's like an idealistic and pointless wish and hope, based on emotional teenage angst of the past.

In effect, in other words, I wish all straight guys were 'curious'. Haha. I wish.

 

[peeonme]

If 2 guys who say that they are str8 want to suck each other and say it was an exchange of favors, it's fine with me.
Chances are that they like sex with their "buds" but have no romantic inclinations.
Are they truly str8? What is truly str8? Many so called str8 guys j/o and fantasize about things that are far outside of the realm of str8,
Is any one really str8? Most operate within the confines of the social norm and suppress all urges to venture elsewhere.

 

[Jersey Domino]

If you try gay sex once, to experiment you aren't necessarily gay. If you go back a second time, after trying it, you apparently like it. You're gay. If you willingly accept a man's penis inside of you you are gay.

If you are willing to have your dick sucked, you aren't necessarily gay. If you insist on having it sucked predominately by men you're gay. If, when you're girlfriend wont do it, you allow a male friend to suck you you are merely horny, but that friend is gay.

If you're willing to penetrate another man's ass or throat you could be horny, bi or gay..... that's a toss-up.

Any man who enjoys sucking dick enough to continue to do so is definitely gay, no matter what he wants others to believe.

Does all of this apply to women too?

 

[JPGhost]

sigh..some of us has mess up opinion. Straight men never try any gay sex, not even once..^^ They know what it is, but they never want to initiate it.

 

[peeonme]

So, if a gay guy who has been engaged in only gay sex since his sex life began fucks a girl, is he then str8 or bi? What if he does it 2 or 3 times?
Maybe she paid him or he did it as a favor to get her pregnant or she was fucking horny... does it matter?
Most people can operate outside of their norm if there is sufficient motivation, excluding coercion.
At the end of the day a persons sexuality is defined by preference, not by action.
After many years of str8 sex only, I am still gay. It did not change me. Why would the same not be true for a str8 guy doing gay sex?

 

[Willie Boy]

So, if a gay guy who has been engaged in only gay sex since his sex life began fucks a girl, is he then str8 or bi? What if he does it 2 or 3 times?

That would be experimenting.

Maybe she paid him or he did it as a favor to get her pregnant or she was fucking horny... does it matter?

That would depend on the reason behind it. If he did it because he enjoyed it, then yes he would likely be bi.

Most people can operate outside of their norm if there is sufficient motivation, excluding coercion.
At the end of the day a persons sexuality is defined by preference, not by action.

Yes, but if the only motive is personal pleasure....... Well, that's pretty much the point. That is the whole premise, if the so-called straight guy keeps coming (pun) back for gay sex and his only motivation is his own pleasure he ain't straight, no matter how loudly he screams and denounces "fags" as evil. At the end of the day actions still speak louder than words. Who we are IS defined by what we regularly do, not what we claim to do.

After many years of str8 sex only, I am still gay. It did not change me. Why would the same not be true for a str8 guy doing gay sex?

What was your motivation? I'm guessing it had quite a bit to do with life in the closet....... Am I right? You were like a foreigner in a strange land, just following along with what they did so they'd think you were one of them.

 

[rareboy]

I finally watched this stupid video.

The guy makes it pretty clear that he isn't straight.

And it is a bro-job. Not bro-blow.

 

[sixthson]

Any gay guy who thinks there are all these straight guys out there who believe "a mouth is a mouth" and will just lie back and let it happen has probably never given or received a blowjob. It takes more than a mouth or dick to bring excitement and passion to sex.
Do you want to spend a lifetime sexually servicing guys who just want to cum and walk away from you? How lonely will that be?

 

[peeonme]

I am just not so fast to put labels on guys. It has to do with inhibitions, availability of the opposite sex and the possibility of being found out.
Boys in their teens have a lack of access to girls in some cases, coupled with a strong sex drive and a lack of inhibitions, two of them watching porn might experiment, on a regular basis. As they mature inhibitions grow along with access to girls and they become exclusively hetero, should circumstances occur where they once again need sex they have been there , done it and got the T shirt.

Many find themselves in sexless marriages (far more common than one would think) a friend with benefits to them is safer than a girlfriend, nsa.

Call them what you will, they present themselves as married men or single guys and you would have no clue that they meet with a guy on occasion.

Again, to me it is about availability of one's preferred sex, but any port in a storm.

 

[sixthson]

We're not talking about men in prison who have no access to women or porn. We're talking about straight men letting gay men service them just because no woman is nearby. Even a straight guy who might admit to being curious can only call himself curious for so long. After that he needs to stop calling himself straight.

 

[peeonme]

We're not talking about men in prison who have no access to women or porn. We're talking about straight men letting gay men service them just because no woman is nearby. Even a straight guy who might admit to being curious can only call himself curious for so long. After that he needs to stop calling himself straight.

I think it's more about societal constraints, men are worried about what they get caught doing, not about what they do.
Even if woman are "near by" to get any action a dude has to wine and dine them, give a glimmer of hope about a long term relationship.
I see many guys as sexual, they would take what ever would get them off if they could get away with it.

 

[xbuzzerx]

I think it's more about societal constraints, men are worried about what they get caught doing, not about what they do.
Even if woman are "near by" to get any action a dude has to wine and dine them, give a glimmer of hope about a long term relationship.
I see many guys as sexual, they would take what ever would get them off if they could get away with it.

Other than wishful thinking, I have never clearly understood why gay men as a whole do not seem to be able to say, "that shudder I feel at having sex with women? That's what straight men feel about sex with men... except it's stronger, and socially reinforced from birth."

And that we insist there's lots of things straight men would do for fun with gay men (or just men in general) if not for the fear of getting caught, when gay men do not casually pursue women for sex. And women are a lot easier to find than gay men.

That all women require a 1972 Catholic courtship before they'll put out is definitely an out of touch generalization. Sex happens relatively early and people figure out if something more can work out after that is relatively common for heterosexuals today too... not just gay men.

 

[sixthson]

I think Buzzer is right. Why is it always the "straight" guy willing and ready to have sex with other guys and seldom the gay guy ready to bed a female? If men are all alike, shouldn't it work both ways?

 

[sixthson]

There was a guy I used to mess around with years ago. He'd go back and forth between saying he was straight and bi. He only sucked me a few times for a few minutes. He fucked me but wouldn't let me fuck him. He had me give him blowjobs on numerous occasions. He let me finger or rim him sometimes. What do you think? Straight or bi?

Was he middle eastern or muslim?

 

[peeonme]

I think Buzzer is right. Why is it always the "straight" guy willing and ready to have sex with other guys and seldom the gay guy ready to bed a female? If men are all alike, shouldn't it work both ways?

TBH, I believe most gay guys go through a stage where they want to be attracted to females, then they find that guys are what flips their switch.
I think that most gay guys don't "shudder" at the thought of sex with a female, they find them neutral, maybe the thought of eating pussy would sicken some gay guys as well as some str8 guys I guess.

I think most str8 guys go through a time when they worry about being gay, the ones who never get over it turn homophobic and are more likely to be the guys on Craigslist looking for some action with a guy.

 

[Kahaih]

I think 'familiarity' is often overlooked or underestimated in these 'what a straight guy will or won't do' threads.

A straight man lives his entire life with his own 'junk'. He's comfortable with it. I sure someone with the same equipment wouldn't put him off to the same extent a gay man would likely be put off by the idea of venturing into unfamiliar/very different territory. The level of desire/interest/possibility wouldn't be the same – wouldn't be equal.

 

[xbuzzerx]

TBH,
I think that most gay guys don't "shudder" at the thought of sex with a female, they find them neutral

And I would say you are describing men in some stage of the closet.

Most gay men do not just see "no appeal or unappeal", there's active unappeal to the idea. And that's even more true for straight men thinking about gay sex because there's a lifetime of social programming that that's pretty much the antithesis of being male.

 

[peeonme]

And I would say you are describing men in some stage of the closet.

Most gay men do not just see "no appeal or unappeal", there's active unappeal to the idea. And that's even more true for straight men thinking about gay sex because there's a lifetime of social programming that that's pretty much the antithesis of being male.

Maybe I am somewhat bi, but the thought of eating out a female does not repulse me, I have done it and while it was sloppy it was not sickening, I would prefer to suck cock.
I was unaware of any aversion to the female body, I just thought it did not turn gay guys on, in my case in some instances I found some females to be hot, I found something hot about most guys in decent shape.
There may well be shades of gay, if so, could there not be the opposite in the str8 community? Or do they have to be 100% str8?
If that is the case is anyone str8? I would bet that most guys have had gay thoughts and fantasies.

 

[xbuzzerx]

Maybe I am somewhat bi, but the thought of eating out a female does not repulse me, I have done it and while it was sloppy it was not sickening, I would prefer to suck cock.
I was unaware of any aversion to the female body, I just thought it did not turn gay guys on, in my case in some instances I found some females to be hot, I found something hot about most guys in decent shape.
There may well be shades of gay, if so, could there not be the opposite in the str8 community? Or do they have to be 100% str8?
If that is the case is anyone str8? I would bet that most guys have had gay thoughts and fantasies.

Don't get me wrong, I think almost all sex acts are, objectively, once you completely remove sexual desire, not very appealing. The sexual desire of the person engaging in those sex acts "gets them over" what you would otherwise consider gross in a world without sex drive or sexual appeal. Touching someone's internal mucous membranes? Swallowing fluids that come out of orifices? Yeah, it's not appealing at all once you factor out sexual attraction.

But when gay men say they can't summon any desire to do things to a vagina, and actually find them kind of gross, I believe them. I also believe straight men when they say when they try to think about it, they just can't because men gross them out and they think dicks are ugly and having no tits is a dealbreaker for any appeal.

What I find gay men do is believe gay men are telling the truth and straight men are hiding half of it.

 

[Kahaih]

And I would say you are describing men in some stage of the closet.

Most gay men do not just see "no appeal or unappeal", there's active unappeal to the idea. And that's even more true for straight men thinking about gay sex because there's a lifetime of social programming that that's pretty much the antithesis of being male.

The first is 'nature' while the second is 'nurture'.

We'll have to figure out who has the greater desire to overcome/ignore 'nurture', then, I suppose, the straight guy or the gay guy???