The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Supernatural / Jensen Ackles / Jared Padelecki [merged]

Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

Did anyone catch the David Duchovny "X-Files" porn addiction reference Thursday night? It happened so fast. When the little girl on the bicycle dropped the porn magazine that she was taking to the teddy bear, Dean asked Sam, "what is this...some Deep Woods Duchovny?" (or something to that affect). Since I'm sure many "Supernatural" fans were also X-Philes, it was a cool and funny reference.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

Did anyone catch the David Duchovny "X-Files" porn addiction reference Thursday night? It happened so fast. When the little girl on the bicycle dropped the porn magazine that she was taking to the teddy bear, Dean asked Sam, "what is this...some Deep Woods Duchovny?" (or something to that affect). Since I'm sure many "Supernatural" fans were also X-Philes, it was a cool and funny reference.

Yeah I noticed!! It cracked me up...specially Sam's face in reaction to what he said and then Dean's face. LOL!!
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

Did anyone catch the David Duchovny "X-Files" porn addiction reference Thursday night? It happened so fast. When the little girl on the bicycle dropped the porn magazine that she was taking to the teddy bear, Dean asked Sam, "what is this...some Deep Woods Duchovny?" (or something to that affect). Since I'm sure many "Supernatural" fans were also X-Philes, it was a cool and funny reference.

Yeah especially in this episode since X-Files had a similar episode about a small town where wishes come true.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

^^I think Dean suppressed the memories of his time in hell, only to have them resurface during the whole ordeal with the ghost sickness.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

No Dean's had those hell flashes since the first episode this season I believe.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

Hmm...I don't remember him having any flashbacks that episode--I could be wrong.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

Misha (a.k.a. Castiel) said this about the next episodes:

You thought the Wall Street meltdown was scary. How about the apocalypse? "Supernatural" angel Castiel -- actor Misha Collins -- tips that "the next few episodes are going to bring the first real confrontation between heaven and hell" on the CW show. There will be "fisticuffs," says he. However, he also admits, "I don't actually know that much about where things are going in the greater arc of the story."
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

Oohhh. I can't wait--I love fisticuffs.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

I knew it! I knew Sam and Ruby hooked up. it was really hot too. Sam's hookups are few and far btwn but when he has them there is always an intense love scene. It's funny you never actually see Dean in action. I know everyone loves Jensen but I prefer Jared. He's got a body like Hugh Jackman. He's so tall and lean. Perfection.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

I knew it! I knew Sam and Ruby hooked up. it was really hot too. Sam's hookups are few and far btwn but when he has them there is always an intense love scene. It's funny you never actually see Dean in action. I know everyone loves Jensen but I prefer Jared. He's got a body like Hugh Jackman. He's so tall and lean. Perfection.

That scene was really marred for me by new Ruby's horrible acting during her seduction... not that I can really blame her with those lines.

But yeah they show Sam's more in depth I believe because

A) Sam's sex scenes always have much more to do with his personal characterization than with Dean (who despite being the ladies man very rarely actually ever has sex)

B) As much as I LOVE my Jensen... Jared indisputably has the better body despite being marginally less adorable than Jensen.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

I liked tonight's episode. We're getting back on track. We finally got to see what happened with Sam after Dean's death. The sex scene with him and Ruby--hot, although I will say, I kind of liked the blonde Ruby who saved Sam. I wonder who this Alistair demon is. And, the end--awesome. Hell wants the girl alive, Heaven wants her dead...love it. And Castiel is seriously fuckworthy.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

As far as this episode went it was OK... I really think the Ruby flashbacks seem to drag and eat a lot of time. I think this was probably an episode that turned out to be 1.5 episodes and they stretched it to 2. Because I was so in for the first two acts and the last act was great but in between it was kinda meh.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

I think it would have been better if they had dealt with Sam's mourning as a separate episode, mixed with Dean's experience in hell. Tonight's episode would have been better if they had simply focused on the demons pursuit of the woman.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

I agree the brunette Ruby's overall acting is bad. But her sex acting is on point. As much as I love Katie Cassidy as Ruby, I doubt she could have thrown down like that with Jared.

But as far as the story of Sam's struggle, I wish they would have told all this earlier instead of so many filler episodes back to back. Then they should have introduced this storyline with the girl on its own. I wanted to know more about the girl and her powers. While Ruby sucks at acting the red-haired girl is one of my favorite guest actresses. I knew Dean was gonna have something with her when she called him "The Dean." I do kinda like the Operation Double Date thing that seems to be going on in next weeks episode. I like when the boys are part of a team and not just the 2 of them.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

I agree the brunette Ruby's overall acting is bad. But her sex acting is on point. As much as I love Katie Cassidy as Ruby, I doubt she could have thrown down like that with Jared.

But as far as the story of Sam's struggle, I wish they would have told all this earlier instead of so many filler episodes back to back. Then they should have introduced this storyline with the girl on its own. I wanted to know more about the girl and her powers. While Ruby sucks at acting the red-haired girl is one of my favorite guest actresses. I knew Dean was gonna have something with her when she called him "The Dean." I do kinda like the Operation Double Date thing that seems to be going on in next weeks episode. I like when the boys are part of a team and not just the 2 of them.

I like it for an episode. I don't know if I'd like it indefinitely. I personally like filler. I think that's what episodic dramas should be... episodic. I especially like the funny Ben Edlund episodes when they're tossed in there.

I think the reason you can't see Katie Cassidy throwing down like that is because it was so blatantly out of character. The character of Ruby had definite flirtatious undertones when she was introduced in the very beginning but they were quickly dropped and she was drawn as a serious business bitch. Aside from that wooden scene with lesbianic undertones in Malleus Maleficarium they dialed back the sex on Ruby. That whole scene/transition was written very poorly though. For a scene that's suppose to be putting us on Ruby's side it made her seem awfully predatory. It was a clear seduction and didn't seem like she was genuinely connecting with Sam at all.

My personal thought is that this is a companion piece to episode 4 (where Dean goes back in time). It's a story with essentially no Dean to counteract no Sam. It would've been more intelligent in my opinion if they made this episode 5 and gave Ruby and Sam something of substance to do where this could be flash backed a bit but more realistically draw out the reality of their relationship in whatever present situation they were dealing with.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

Meh...the episode is mediocre. For what I was expecting, it was really disappointing. I was expecting some awesome action between the angels and demons and what do I get? Basically, a bunch of flashbacks... *yawns* ...boring! There were some good scenes but overall it's a meh episode...IMO it's a filler. They could've handled things differently but whatever...I can't believe I'm gonna have to wait 1 fucking week to see the battle between the angels and demons. Holy shit! That's gonna be THE awesomeness!
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

For what i read all around, people seems not agree on thrusday epi "heaven and hell"
WHat do you think about it?
Love it, hate it?I'm curious over there
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

For what i read all around, people seems not agree on thrusday epi "heaven and hell"
WHat do you think about it?
Love it, hate it?I'm curious over there

Overall, I'd say it was a mediocre episode...just ok. Could've been MUCH better but it could've been worse as well. It had it's amazing moments and it's lame ass moments so...all 'n all...OK episode.

I expected a LOT more from the fight between the Angels and the Demons. I was very disappointed! And what the fuck was wrong with Castiel? He's Uriel's boss yet Uriel's much more powerful than he is. Pff :rolleyes:
It did have, nonetheless, it's cool moments.

The whole sex with an angel thing was lame. Period.

I LOVED Pamela coming back! She only participated 2 times on the show yet she's one of my favorite characters...sassy, witty and sexy. She's awesome! Great scene! "Sam is that you? (...) You know how I know it's you? *grabs his ass* Because of that perky little ass of yours" :rotflmao:

The final scene...was the highlight of the episode. Amazing scene! Jensen really delivered a solid and great performance there!

What I feel about the last two episodes is that they were incredibly rushed...wich is one thing I despise and fucking hate! The episode before this one was fucking horribly done! One of the worst episodes ever in Supernatural. This one, although much better, still failed to impress and be consistent. The season started with a bang and pure awesomeness. But after the first episodes it started to lose interest (those comic episodes were so fucking out of place it's not even funny...complete and utter fillers...disgustingly done! Wtf were they thinking? Butchering the show? By the looks of it...they might succeed!). I'm disappointed at the direction they're taking the show. When it began it seemed like it was going to be the very best season of Supernatural but as it stands as of now...not so sure anymore. Hopefully, the holiday break will give them time to put their act together and treat the show with the decency that it deserves.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

I loved this episode. It was great. I'm not the kind who needs a lot of flash in the pan though. I've never watched this show (or any) for it's action sequences. I thought it was a really strong narrative and I thought it was told well. The only issue I had was that new Ruby's bad acting kept pulling me out of it.... because DAMN was that acting bad.

I also felt a bit cheated at the end when it was revealed that Dean, Ruby and Sam were working in unison rather than it be Ruby betraying them and Dean caving to protect Sam. I don't know. It just felt a little cheap to me. I was also expecting a little more in the line of Alistair/Dean interaction but I'm fine with what I got.

On the issue of Dean and Anna I thought it was an excellent idea and it feels very right for both characters. It was good to pair Dean up with a fleeting love interest that contrasted so strongly with him. I've been on Supernatural boards before and I think a lot of people get pissed if Dean has any love interest whatsoever simply because... well they want to be his love interest (there I said it). I don't think that's the case with most fans or anyone here but there's that sect out there that gets all fussy when Dean's with anyone. There's also a sect that gets all huffy if Sam and Dean aren't the solution for EVERYTHING and I'm sure there are people out there who are bitter about the fact it was Anna who got Dean to open up and not Sam. It only makes sense thought that being as ashamed of himself as Dean was there's no way he would open up spontaneously. It had to come from someone who all ready knew what he did and started in by assuring him he was OK. It just makes sense with the characters and who they are.

Also my gut tells me that Anna could very well be back in an angelic capacity... however she will be cold and emotionless and will lack her connection with Dean, who will still have feelings for her. I could definitely see that coming into play if for instance next time it's time to destroy a whole city it's Anna who's giving the order. That will really send Dean's head spinning in the right vs wrong, heaven vs hell arena.

I should add that it was refreshing seeing a young attractive actress who CAN act on this show and Julie McNiven can. She's so far above the drek they normally get. Not since Nicki Aycox have I been so pleased with their casting of a young attractive female.

ALSO I was FLOORED by the remark in the show that Uriel was below not only Anna but Castiel. I just always assumed that Uriel was an Arch Angel. There was nothing to indicate it directly but given my knowledge of Christianity it seemed the only logical conclusion when one keeps in mind just how consistent the show has been with lore.
 
Re: Supernatural's back, baby!

hell freakin yeah
JENSENS BACK i mean supernaturals back :P
 
Back
Top