The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Supreme Court Ruling in Ohio Voter-Registration Dispute

fabulouslyghetto

fabulouslyghetto

Kween of Hot Topics
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Posts
24,911
Reaction score
1,013
Points
113
Location
The Trap
5 republican-appointed SCOTUS have just ruled that states can nullify your voter registration if you haven't voted in recent years. Voting is now a use-it-or-lose-it special privelege, not a right. The 4 democrat-appointed justices ruled against this.
 
Re: another reminder that both parties aren't [always] the same

fabulouslyghetto said:
5 republican-appointed SCOTUS have just ruled that states can nullify your voter registration if you haven't voted in recent years. Voting is now a use-it-or-lose-it special privelege, not a right. The 4 democrat-appointed justices ruled against this.
Click to expand...


Any idea what their reasoning was?


I could see if you disappeared off the face of the Earth, but if there is any activity, such are rent being paid or mail still being checked at their address for them there is no reason for it.
 
Re: another reminder that both parties aren't [always] the same

fabulouslyghetto said:
… SCOTUS have just ruled that states can nullify your voter registration if you haven't voted in recent years.
Click to expand...

The Ohio case involved failure to vote in 2 consecutive federal elections, plus failure to respond to a notice sent through the mail, then followed by failure to vote during an additional 4-year period.


 
The law in question does not seem that unreasonable. If you don't vote for over 4 years and don't respond to mail sent to you, it is not an unreasonable assumption that you have moved or don't want to vote anymore. States do need some criteria for cleaning up their voter rolls of people who have moved away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top