The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Tell me more about Andreus

Nevertheless Johann was correct.

In a court of law if you can't produce a body, you can't rule there was a death or a murder at all.
Not true nowadays due to the massive jumps in forensic science.
The United States case of People v. Scott 176 Cal. App. 2d 458 (1960) held that "circumstantial evidence, when sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis, may prove the death of a missing person, the existence of a homicide and the guilt of the accused."
 
^ That is not too difficult to do with the right 'programme ' and probably accounts why Corny had great difficulty in establishing other activities by Andreus over many years! I would not be surprised if BostonPirate re-appears under another non de plume before too long . But I dont think he will get involved in an Andreus Thread again!

The same computer on a wifi and also equipped with a 3G modem would give 2 different ip numbers, one for each instance. Alternatively, a computer and a cellphone would give 2 different IPs as well.

-d-
 
Nevertheless Johann was correct.

In a court of law if you can't produce a body, you can't rule there was a death or a murder at all.

'Andreus Thanos' may just be an invented nom-de-plume.

We're treating it as if it is a real name.

Produce Andreus Thanos' death certificate, or his birth certificate, perhaps his brother's for all we care.

Or for that matter BostonPirate's tenancy records for said AT. ;)

For some reason BP has disappeared too.
 
I do recall a thread in which the two of them threatened to meet up since they were both in Bahston, but I don't recall hearing anything beyond that.

-d-
Could be Pegasus69, too? I remember something in one of the threads he posted in (or, perhaps, his own?) about meeting with another area member, I think may have been dynk, and they DID meet. Pegasus69 was the first guy in here who I "saw dying" - some kind of cancer. I have no doubt, not even in the slightest, that he was real.

Pegasus69 lived in (or near) Hyannis, which isn't exactly Boston, but is certainly in the neighborhood.

Star-warrior, I see a central, devastating flaw in your reasoning.

The person known as Andreus Thanos supposedly lived in the United States, so he'd live under the jurisdiction of United States courts.

With that in mind, courtrooms in the United States simply don't deal with this kind of issue.
I read his post somewhat differently than you did. I read it more as saying that the quality of evidence presented in this thread, whether it involved embezzlement, a homicide, identity theft, drug trafficking, etc. would FAIL in a courtroom. Just as the co-yinky-dink of activity in Audreus' account within two hours of BP's disappearance constitutes PROOF of nothing, a surveillance cam picture of somebody's car in the same city block VICINITY (and around the same time) near a drug crime wouldn't (or shouldn't!! But, with some of today's prosecutors etc., who knows?) hold up in a courtroom.
 
'Andreus Thanos' may just be an invented nom-de-plume.

We're treating it as if it is a real name.

Produce Andreus Thanos' death certificate, or his birth certificate, perhaps his brother's for all we care.

Or for that matter BostonPirate's tenancy records for said AT. ;)

For some reason BP has disappeared too.
It wouldn't be the first time, nor will it be the last, that somebody is living their entire life under an assumed name/alias. These people are even able to "prove," often, that they are the person who truly owns that name which is actually fake. If his real name was Theopoulos Taros, no amount of searching for "Andreus Thanos" will ever turn up that real person.

So, though I am entirely convinced that Andreus came out of somebody else's imagination, it isn't because I've seen anything that I consider to truly be PROOF.
 
Now this thread turned into a court room drama? Can it get any better?
 
MANY OTHER PEOPLE moved on from the thread and have understood the fact that people are going to believe what they want. MANY OTHER PEOPLE did not accuse those believers of "lying to themselves."
Maybe it's time for you to be one of the MANY OTHER PEOPLE? I mean, it's pretty obvious that you're getting quite worked up about it ..



Wrong again my friend: Corny has held that Enchanted is not Boston Pirate. See posts 755 and 778.
Correct.

then this thread is just going to keep on going around & around in circles and therefore, probably should be closed.
Indeed, but most people vehemently spoke out against it.


I have absolutely bugger all to contribute to this wearisome thread but I just fancied being the 1000th person to post in it.
1000th post, not person - but you succeeded ;)
 
^Why yes, yes there is.

You get to show us your c0ck, you lucky boy!




Over to you. :D

-d-
 
And she stopped a day before, too ... and came back to post this. I'm quite annoyed about people who point fingers at others for behavior that they're displaying themselves. Not sure what you're trying to tell me with the 2nd paragraph. But I guess I have to excuse myself now for spending two days elsewhere and not following this thread?
 
One notes that Corny has never said that Boston Pirate and Andreus are/were not the same poster.


hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........
 
Andreus...

a combination of:

2007_300_062.jpg


and

alex1.jpg


and

saint-sebastian-3923-mid.jpg
 
I'm simply saying that there were 100 posts since Stacy, some of which were every bit as sharp as her words, but they were passed over to invite her to leave.

It would seem you had followed it to go back 100 posts in any event.

I start every thread back at the post which came first after my last visit and progress through the latest post. Guess I have to justify me for this now, too?
 
Are you in need of a cross?

I didn't see many others shouting at the rest of the people basically to STFU and GTFO.
 
There is a difference between being just acerbic and what I described. And even IF? So I did single out, the first one that I came across, and not the rest? So what? You're now singling me out if you want it that way. And no, you are not making YOU as the victim, you are trying to hang someone else on a a cross. Someone who can very well defend herself.
 
Back
Top