The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Texas Republican Judge Switches Party, Denouncing GOP as Party of Bigots and Hate-Mongers

xbuzzerx said:
What the Constitution does justify is opposing taxes or prejudicial qualification requirements that try to thin out who is eligible to vote. And usually along racial and socioeconomic lines to improve the viability of one party. That's what your "voter ID cards" are all about. If you believe mass fraud elects Democrats, prove it.
Click to expand...

Well said. The measure for all the voter ID laws has to be whether they do more harm than good to the ability to vote. Inhibiting fraud is definitely a public good, but it cannot be done in a way that inhibits voting.
 
Kulindahr said:
They stand for Social Darwinism, and interpret the Constitution by it.

That's as opposed to the general liberal Social Nannyism, with which they do the same thing.
Click to expand...

I challenge you to find a find a Republicand advocating Social Darwinism. It is liberal lie.
 
xbuzzerx said:
What the Constitution does justify is opposing taxes or prejudicial qualification requirements that try to thin out who is eligible to vote. And usually along racial and socioeconomic lines to improve the viability of one party. That's what your "voter ID cards" are all about. If you believe mass fraud elects Democrats, prove it.
Click to expand...

Another Democrat lie. We are entitled to honest elections whether the democrats want them or not.
 
Kulindahr said:
Rights exist by virtue of self-ownership. They come from the phenomenon of self-awareness. The very foundation of this country is that rights cannot be created; they have been granted by our Creator, and the only thing that humans can do is either protect them or afflict others for attempting to exercise them.

Generally, anyone who claims that rights have to be created falls into the group that wants to afflict others for exercising rights.

BTW, what courts do is decide where the boundaries are when rights bump into each other. So the real question in Roe v. Wade is not whether a right was created -- it wasn't -- but whether they drew the boundary correctly. What actually occurred is that they ignored one right and passed the buck, which is a big fail... although OTOH they didn't then have a firm scientific foundation for making a good decision in the first place.
Click to expand...
Not helpful since we do not know whether there is a creator or what rights he created. Whether babies have a right to live or women a right to kill their babies is a matter of opinion. Who knows whether the creator wants same sex marriage?
 
Benvolio said:
Not helpful since we do not know whether there is a creator or what rights he created. Whether babies have a right to live or women a right to kill their babies is a matter of opinion. Who knows whether the creator wants same sex marriage?
Click to expand...

The creator in the Enlightenment welcomes change with open arms.
 
Benvolio said:
Not helpful since we do not know whether there is a creator or what rights he created. Whether babies have a right to live or women a right to kill their babies is a matter of opinion. Who knows whether the creator wants same sex marriage?
Click to expand...

Republicans aren't interested in the survival of babies; the evidence is that they fight to eliminate every program they can that helps children.

And Roe v. Wade wasn't about babies.


Oh -- the answer to your question is "reason". Anyone with a clue about the formation of this country would know that.
 
Kulindahr said:
Republicans aren't interested in the survival of babies; the evidence is that they fight to eliminate every program they can that helps children.

And Roe v. Wade wasn't about babies.


Oh -- the answer to your question is "reason". Anyone with a clue about the formation of this country would know that.
Click to expand...

I doubt if a single person involved in the formation of the country would have agreed that the creator wants same sex marriages. If you have knowledge to the contrary, by all means let us know.
 
Benvolio said:
I doubt if a single person involved in the formation of the country would have agreed that the creator wants same sex marriages. If you have knowledge to the contrary, by all means let us know.
Click to expand...

The "creator", being a generic creator and not the Christian God, would not have any opinion on any marriage, and would only want what's best for society. And reason says that when a segment of society is denied basic rights and privileges that the rest take for granted, society suffers.

How do YOU feel about gay marriage? You've never said a word in any of the topics dedicated to it, and I am curious.
 
Benvolio said:
I doubt if a single person involved in the formation of the country would have agreed that the creator wants same sex marriages. If you have knowledge to the contrary, by all means let us know.
Click to expand...

I'm sure that a Creator wouldn't be half interested in most of the drivel of constitutions and sexual politics etc.

The fact is that the 'Creator' has overseen the evolution of humans from single cell organisms to the present version. Having endowed the species with a desire for sexual contact and intimacy, both hetero and homosexual...I'll bet that I'm pretty close to knowing the will of creation when I say that it doesn't give a shit if you put a ring on it. Given that the Creator also has made mammals who will kill and eat their own young...I also doubt if creation cares whether we have abortions or murder one another either.

It is humans who have created the construct of equality of all of us as an inherent right and established the civil codes that we live by in order to survive. It is what separates us from lower animals and makes us a civilized species. Our Creator doesn't care whether we see ourselves as equal or not. There are some, like yourself, who see other races and cultures as inferior to your own. Fortunately, there are more people that don't.

Heteros have no more need or right to a marriage than homos. But since they have it...and it is enshrined in the civil code of the US...there is no reason for homos...just like blacks...to be denied the same rights.

I also would like to know more about your own position on homo marriage.
 
Who the fuck cares what someone's "creator wants" equality isn't a religious proposition.
 
I beg to differ. A 32 year old virgin who spent his life with 12 other men, wearing a dress, could not possibly hate me for a little consequence free cocksucking.
 
Benvolio said:
Not helpful since we do not know whether there is a creator or what rights he created. Whether babies have a right to live or women a right to kill their babies is a matter of opinion. Who knows whether the creator wants same sex marriage?
Click to expand...

And, to follow your theme, who knows whether the creator wants stupid people?
 
We don't call it stupidity now, we call it "conservative values".

HEY BENVOLIO, WILL YOU TELL US WHAT YOU THINK OF SAME SEX MARRIAGE?

I mean, I know it doesn't concern you personally, but still, you must have an opinion.
 
Rolyo85 said:
Apparently not. One wonders why a member of a gay forum would so thoroughly avoid giving his opinion on gay marriage...
Click to expand...

Just for fun I'll give mine:

Marriage as established by God is between male and female.

That has absolutely nothing at all to do with government-defined marriage, which can be anything at all -- and in fact should be defined as "whatever form citizens wish to enter into".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top