The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

The Clinton Contamination by Dowd

The columnist won a Pulitzer for her Clinton-Lewinsky columns back in the nineties.

Colin Powell strongly protested the classification of some of his emails as 'classified'. His examples seem reasonable.
Given the FBI imposed a similar standard on Clinton's emails, are the claims about 'endangering staff', and 'national security' valid at all?

This is the politics of personality playing out again. Ironically enough against a Republican candidate who seems dangerously cynical and likely corrupt.
 
Dowd is a miserable attention whore who's time has come and gone. Ted Cruz is an unlikeable power crazed phony who is hated by people who know him---Hillary is not. She is beloved by dems and many repubs and by people who really know her. I think the 25 years of gop hunting of Hillary has made her paranoid----even though she is still amazingly strong and smart. I think the paranoia got her into this email nonsense. A bad person or criminal she is not---Comey is a great honest man----he knows there's no crime here. But we don't have a real choice here---a rich money whore psycho named Trump---who is crazy and stupid ---or an imperfect Hillary. So, there is no choice.
 
She's got an interestingly sympathetic take on Trump.
She seems to assume that his apparent practise of telling society friends one thing about his politics, and the public something quite different is nothing more than a risky tactic.
Doesn't seem to strike her that he may be misleading her and her peers in the cocktail circuit.

mobile.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/opinion/sunday/trump-in-the-dumps.html

Given his low ratings at the time of writing, maybe she believes him to be unimportant.
 
I, too, agree with Maureen Dowd. Despite the fact that Hillary is a morally and ethically compromised candidate, however, I will vote for her because the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency is to awful to contemplate. Hillary may be morally and ethically compromised, but Trump is simply amoral and unethical. He lacks the morals and ethics to be compromised in the first place.
 
As I said in another thread, I feel that voting for HRC is similar to voting for Richard M. Nixon.

MUCH, MUCH BETTER than voting for Hitler, Mussolini, or Napoleon.

The alternative to HRC is so awful that I won't even "need to hold my nose" this year; under the alternative I'm not convinced that the longevity of the USA (or the planet) is assured.
 
frankfrank said:
As I said in another thread, I feel that voting for HRC is similar to voting for Richard M. Nixon.

MUCH, MUCH BETTER than voting for Hitler, Mussolini, or Napoleon.

The alternative to HRC is so awful that I won't even "need to hold my nose" this year; under the alternative I'm not convinced that the longevity of the USA (or the planet) is assured.
Click to expand...

Be interesting to see how much of that is based on actions by the Clintons, and how much of that perception is from accusations leveled at them over the years.

Can you think of any other presidential pairing who've had as much investigation done into their background? It seems that the tradition of throwing enough mud until something sticks has been boosted since the Watergate scandal.

Republicans seem desperate to find a Democrat president that can be found guilty of the same things Nixon did. They've always been unsuccessful.
 
Kabluey said:
Be interesting to see how much of that is based on actions by the Clintons, and how much of that perception is from accusations leveled at them over the years.

Can you think of any other presidential pairing who've had as much investigation done into their background? It seems that the tradition of throwing enough mud until something sticks has been boosted since the Watergate scandal.

Republicans seem desperate to find a Democrat president that can be found guilty of the same things Nixon did. They've always been unsuccessful.
Click to expand...

He was disbarred by the US Supreme Court. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/02/duncancampbell
 
If the choice is between Hilary an Trump some gay a holes will vote for Trump it happened in Germany with another guy in the 30's . There was no vote there they just said nothing and when the Nazi's came for them there was no one left to say anything !
 
Kabluey said:
Over getting his dick sucked.
Click to expand...

and, he was caught...in this respect Bill failed...others were wise enough not to get caught in the act.

FDR had a wife living in the WH, and two mistresses, one of whom lived in the WH...

...the good old days, when journalists were tight lipped on matters that journalists deemed inappropriate to share with their readers...
 
frankfrank said:
As I said in another thread, I feel that voting for HRC is similar to voting for Richard M. Nixon.

MUCH, MUCH BETTER than voting for Hitler, Mussolini, or Napoleon.

The alternative to HRC is so awful that I won't even "need to hold my nose" this year; under the alternative I'm not convinced that the longevity of the USA (or the planet) is assured.
Click to expand...

A lot of people voted for Nixon. I was among them before getting killed in 'Nam.

What irritates me is that Hillary gets hit with all of Bill's negatives, but none of the popularity. She doesn't lack character for not leaving him.
 
offthewall14420 said:
A lot of people voted for Nixon. I was among them before getting killed in 'Nam.

What irritates me is that Hillary gets hit with all of Bill's negatives, but none of the popularity. She doesn't lack character for not leaving him.
Click to expand...

I saw a campaign ad that basically accused her of being the reason Bill cheated. I suppose that was to be expected, but then I'd hoped we were past that kind of thing already. My mistake.
 
TX-Beau said:
I saw a campaign ad that basically accused her of being the reason Bill cheated. I suppose that was to be expected, but then I'd hoped we were past that kind of thing already. My mistake.
Click to expand...

But isn't that always the fallback of the cheating man?

My wife/partner drove me to this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top