The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

the constitution needs some fixing

Justice Souter deals with the "strict constrictionist" arguments here: http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2010/05/text-of-justice-david-souters-speech/

David Souter found Scalia and Thomas absolutely loathsome, vile, pigs, and rightfully so. He was really the hero in Bush v. Gore, and the insane, partisanship, the pigs of the court showed themselves to be.

The USA today would be a far different, better, non-recession plagued country had Al Gore been elected, IMO. Al Gore stepped aside to do the right thing for the country, or so he thought at the time. He didn't realize that Republicans don't give a shit about the country, they only care about themselves.
 
David Souter found Scalia and Thomas absolutely loathsome, vile, pigs, and rightfully so. He was really the hero in Bush v. Gore, and the insane, partisanship, the pigs of the court showed themselves to be.

The USA today would be a far different, better, non-recession plagued country had Al Gore been elected, IMO. Al Gore stepped aside to do the right thing for the country, or so he thought at the time. He didn't realize that Republicans don't give a shit about the country, they only care about themselves.

if gore had won, we probably would not have had the Iraq war and mostlikely would still be in a surplus.

But those are guesses.
 
Not to mention cut our consumption of foreign oil by 3 or 4 million barrels per day.

which would have been good for the ecology, but the lost revenue in taxes would have been pretty big. I think Gore is the type of guy who would have accounted for that in other ways though.

as I have said, if the military instructs it's billion dollar R&D dept to find alternative fuel source technologies, we would be able to fix this AND have a new technology to sell and tax to other nations of the world.
 
which would have been good for the ecology, but the lost revenue in taxes would have been pretty big. I think Gore is the type of guy who would have accounted for that in other ways though.

as I have said, if the military instructs it's billion dollar R&D dept to find alternative fuel source technologies, we would be able to fix this AND have a new technology to sell and tax to other nations of the world.

He was the architect of the $.50 per gallon tax increase in the Clinton years which Clinton squandered, and cut to a few pennies per gallon. That would have been the first thing he did after 9/11.
 
Very well written, I saved the link. Thanks for posting it!

Thank you. I [STRIKE]wrote it[/STRIKE] read it myself. LOL.

Wooffy, I think Souter's words apply to Canada as well. Harper and the Reform Party want to imitate the worst elements in the US theocratic conservative camp, always bitching about the Supreme Court of Canada when it upholds the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Their arguments are the same as in the US, and I think Souter's reply is largely relevant too.
 
Thank you. I [STRIKE]wrote it[/STRIKE] read it myself. LOL.

Wooffy, I think Souter's words apply to Canada as well. Harper and the Reform Party want to imitate the worst elements in the US theocratic conservative camp, always bitching about the Supreme Court of Canada when it upholds the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Their arguments are the same as in the US, and I think Souter's reply is largely relevant too.

I agree, and we've had the phrase "activist judges" tossed around far to often for my comfort. The cancellation of the Court Challenges Program was also a big blow. Polls asking questions such as, "Do you agrees with Judge XXX's decision" also concern me. They manipulate public perception into thinking that a court ruling is something to agree or disagree with based on one's views, as opposed to reasoned legal thought.

The Harper government has also really weakened the Parliamentary process, and is really pushing at conventions that have kept the Westminster system working until now. I have no doubt that the Speaker will continue to be faced with difficult ruling on procedures and privilege. No system is so good that it can't be abused, and ours clearly has its weaknesses.

Of course, when it comes to Constitutional challenges in Canada, we have the option of asking most of the people who actually wrote it!
 
It needs a few amendments:

* Congress shall pass only such budgets as clearly demarcate the expenditures, and provide revenue for them all. No budget shall be considered thus balanced which draws upon any fund established by law, or any revenues designated to any such fund or to a particular purpose, in order to provide revenues for the whole budget.

No emergency funding bills shall be passed, except there be attached new sources of revenue sufficient to the funding.

In case of declared war, Congress may incur debt for the expenses thereof, but not without establishing in law a plan for repayment.

* In all cases of trial for a crime, except in matters of plain and accepted moral values, ignorance of the law shall constitute a positive defense.

* Save in matters of national security, in any conflict of law that argument which most strongly defends or establishes individual liberty shall prevail.

* The right of self-defense shall not be infringed or fettered. The level of force for resisting attack or the invasion of home or business, or in coming to the aid of a victim of crime against person, shall be at the discretion of the defender.

* The total number of non-military employees of the United States, including those working on contract to the government for specific services, shall not exceed 1% of the population of the United States.

* No member of the House of Representatives shall be permitted more than two consecutive terms. A Representative who serves one term may return after one term of absence; a Representative who serves two may not return until two terms have passed.

No one shall serve as a Senator except having first worked in the private sector at least as many years as the term being sought. Years in the private sector count only once.

* No bill presented to the President for consideration shall address more than one topic. If the President determines that a second topic has been address by some particular portion of a bill, he shall excise that portion and return it to the house in which it originated.

* No document generated by the executive branch or any agency of the United States may be classified secret except with the approval of three members of each house of Congress, two of which members shall be of the opposite party of the President.

* Each state shall be entitled to at least two representatives in the House. A second Representative to which a state may be entitled by this amendment shall not count under the limitation on representatives in Public Law 62-5.

* Every resident of the United States and its territories is guaranteed the right of freedom of association.

* No life shall be taken for the commission of a crime, save by the victim of a person defending the victim, or in case of mass murder, where the identity is confirmed by two or more witnesses and corroborated by the best available forensic technology.

* In suits at common law, of one citizen or group of citizens against another such, the free choice of the complainant to engage in the action from which harm is alleged, shall be a strong defense.

* When at the end of a fiscal year, the United States has a budget surplus, those funds shall be used to pay down any debt, and if there is no debt, be put into a trust held for funding emergency responses to national disasters.

* If any property be seized in connection with a crime, the state must prove that the property was the result of gain from that crime, or the property must be returned, with interest, and in good condition.

* No communication between two citizens of the United States or any territory thereof may be monitored in any fashion, save by lawful order of a court, and by cause of suspicion of threat to the security of the United States.



I think that covers my current list. For fun, try to decide how many of those grow out of the abuses of the last dozen years of government. :cool:
 
It needs a few amendments:

* Congress shall pass only such budgets as clearly demarcate the expenditures, and provide revenue for them all. No budget shall be considered thus balanced which draws upon any fund established by law, or any revenues designated to any such fund or to a particular purpose, in order to provide revenues for the whole budget.

No emergency funding bills shall be passed, except there be attached new sources of revenue sufficient to the funding.

In case of declared war, Congress may incur debt for the expenses thereof, but not without establishing in law a plan for repayment.

* In all cases of trial for a crime, except in matters of plain and accepted moral values, ignorance of the law shall constitute a positive defense.

* Save in matters of national security, in any conflict of law that argument which most strongly defends or establishes individual liberty shall prevail.

* The right of self-defense shall not be infringed or fettered. The level of force for resisting attack or the invasion of home or business, or in coming to the aid of a victim of crime against person, shall be at the discretion of the defender.

* The total number of non-military employees of the United States, including those working on contract to the government for specific services, shall not exceed 1% of the population of the United States.

* No member of the House of Representatives shall be permitted more than two consecutive terms. A Representative who serves one term may return after one term of absence; a Representative who serves two may not return until two terms have passed.

No one shall serve as a Senator except having first worked in the private sector at least as many years as the term being sought. Years in the private sector count only once.

* No bill presented to the President for consideration shall address more than one topic. If the President determines that a second topic has been address by some particular portion of a bill, he shall excise that portion and return it to the house in which it originated.

* No document generated by the executive branch or any agency of the United States may be classified secret except with the approval of three members of each house of Congress, two of which members shall be of the opposite party of the President.

* Each state shall be entitled to at least two representatives in the House. A second Representative to which a state may be entitled by this amendment shall not count under the limitation on representatives in Public Law 62-5.

* Every resident of the United States and its territories is guaranteed the right of freedom of association.

* No life shall be taken for the commission of a crime, save by the victim of a person defending the victim, or in case of mass murder, where the identity is confirmed by two or more witnesses and corroborated by the best available forensic technology.

* In suits at common law, of one citizen or group of citizens against another such, the free choice of the complainant to engage in the action from which harm is alleged, shall be a strong defense.

* When at the end of a fiscal year, the United States has a budget surplus, those funds shall be used to pay down any debt, and if there is no debt, be put into a trust held for funding emergency responses to national disasters.

* If any property be seized in connection with a crime, the state must prove that the property was the result of gain from that crime, or the property must be returned, with interest, and in good condition.

* No communication between two citizens of the United States or any territory thereof may be monitored in any fashion, save by lawful order of a court, and by cause of suspicion of threat to the security of the United States.



I think that covers my current list. For fun, try to decide how many of those grow out of the abuses of the last dozen years of government. :cool:

I chose the ones from your list that I like and bolded them.
 
I thought you would have liked the "one topic" rule for legislation. It's my compromise between the present idiocy and line-item veto.

I thought of that and worried about the logjam in the senate versus the house. If the Senate has to deal with endless debate and filibusters on every little issue, we are doomed.

It may be better if a better class of people get elected to office, but after seeing the primaries, I know we are just sliding further down hill.

Perhaps one day, that one may work.
 
I thought of that and worried about the logjam in the senate versus the house. If the Senate has to deal with endless debate and filibusters on every little issue, we are doomed.

It may be better if a better class of people get elected to office, but after seeing the primaries, I know we are just sliding further down hill.

Perhaps one day, that one may work.

It sorta has to have my term limitation amendment along with it.

But it would kill a lot of pork: it would be hard to get money for a local freeway interchange (or a bridge to nowhere?) tacked into an agriculture bill, or money for a local museum stuck into a disaster-relief act.
 
It sorta has to have my term limitation amendment along with it.

But it would kill a lot of pork: it would be hard to get money for a local freeway interchange (or a bridge to nowhere?) tacked into an agriculture bill, or money for a local museum stuck into a disaster-relief act.

well if the two were both enacted it may work. True that.
 
Back
Top