On Topic Discussion The Eyes Have It!

[Alistair]

 

[Alistair]

 

[Alistair]

 

[Alistair]

 

[Alistair]

 

[pornoboy]

​

 

[NotHardUp1]

 

[pornoboy]

​

 

[rareboy]

 

[belamyi]

Wrong angle

 

[pornoboy]

​

 

[rareboy]

 

[Alistair]

 

[Alistair]

 

[NotHardUp1]

It is remarkable that the bust, despite the pigments being tested, is still debated as to whether it is a 100-year-old fake, or a genuine 3,000-year-old artifact.

 

[belamyi]

^ Remarkable the reasons that would make it doubtful... I mean it could be right or wrong for the wrong reasons

I always found truly "remarkable" that the "Virgin of the rocks" copy at the National Gallery is brazenly listed as a genuine Leonardo.

The "Salvator Mundi" affair is just a plain scam joke at the literal expense of whoever paid for it.

 

[opinterph]

This thread is for closeup photos of people with remarkable eyes. That could be anyone.

@NotHardUp1

At the request of this thread's creator, the thread is now edited to change its status to “On-Topic” where the topic is defined according limitations specified in the opening post.

Please do not post any images of non-humans or non-human eyes.

The thread creator also requests that all images added henceforth should be “positive” and not antagonistic to the purpose of the thread.

 

[unloadonme]

@NotHardUp1

At the request of this thread's creator, the thread is now edited to change its status to “On-Topic” where the topic is defined according limitations specified in the opening post.

Please do not post any images of non-humans or non-human eyes.

The thread creator also requests that all images added henceforth should be “positive” and not antagonistic to the purpose of the thread.

Ironic that a man who regularly complains that the forum is over-moderated should seek to have his own thread over-moderated! I'll say no more.

 

[NotHardUp1]

Ironic that a man who regularly complains that the forum is over-moderated should seek to have his own thread over-moderated! I'll say no more.

And sad that there is still a need.

The intentional spamming and hijacking of threads has been here since the beginning of the forum. We apparently will not outlive it.

"Over-moderated" vs. moderated is of course in the eyes of the readers.

I've never argued that there is no need for moderation, only less changing of posts and titles.

 

[rareboy]

Escher 1946