Allicide
Sex God
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Posts
- 577
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 18
Re: Cody Cummings to be fucked? [merged]
Exactly, how have I crossed the line? I have ony stated my opinions and facts about their marketing model or shady practices. In fact, I never called anyone -except Cody- names or divulged sensitive or private information even when I knew it and REALLY wanted to out it on blast. If they don't want to be labeled as homophobes then stop allowing homophobic bullshit to occur.
I'm not sure exactly what I said that pissed him off except I did post the ND drops in web traffic but anyone can research that pretty quickly.
As for the photography, don't get me wrong I think Mick Hick's studio does great work...my complaint is that if a potential subscriber signs up from a blog because of a scene based on those photos then they are going to be in for a surprise.
I like the fact that with studios like Cocksure Men and Randy Blue that from the photos you know what the scene will be...in a ND photoshoot often the pictures show the models in positions or sometimes even to look like they are fucking when all it is a side by side jerk off or an oral scene. Cody's site is notorious for this.
A few recent glaring examples:
The foursome scene where Tyler left before any of the actual fucking started but the photos make it look like he was in on the group sex for more than a half blowjob by Marcus.
The vampire scene with Marcus and Sammy that looked great in the photos with the setting actually took place in ... a fucking GARAGE!? Don't get me wrong garage sex especially on a motorcycle is hot but the ONLY reason this was shot there was because the room was free. It completely KILLED the concept of the "vampire lover" but it wasn't the directors idea to do it anyway since he hasn't had an original idea since his haircut was current.
Pretty much any time you see a photo set in an interesting setting forget it because the director can't film anything but oral and two positions in a stationary setting - bed, couch, bathroom.
I like the pictures I just think unless they are accurate to the scene then they are false advertising. I mean if you go to a resturant and order steak but they bring you hamburger do you accept it because they are both beef or do you ask where the fuck is your steak?
Exactly, how have I crossed the line? I have ony stated my opinions and facts about their marketing model or shady practices. In fact, I never called anyone -except Cody- names or divulged sensitive or private information even when I knew it and REALLY wanted to out it on blast. If they don't want to be labeled as homophobes then stop allowing homophobic bullshit to occur.
I'm not sure exactly what I said that pissed him off except I did post the ND drops in web traffic but anyone can research that pretty quickly.
As for the photography, don't get me wrong I think Mick Hick's studio does great work...my complaint is that if a potential subscriber signs up from a blog because of a scene based on those photos then they are going to be in for a surprise.
I like the fact that with studios like Cocksure Men and Randy Blue that from the photos you know what the scene will be...in a ND photoshoot often the pictures show the models in positions or sometimes even to look like they are fucking when all it is a side by side jerk off or an oral scene. Cody's site is notorious for this.
A few recent glaring examples:
The foursome scene where Tyler left before any of the actual fucking started but the photos make it look like he was in on the group sex for more than a half blowjob by Marcus.
The vampire scene with Marcus and Sammy that looked great in the photos with the setting actually took place in ... a fucking GARAGE!? Don't get me wrong garage sex especially on a motorcycle is hot but the ONLY reason this was shot there was because the room was free. It completely KILLED the concept of the "vampire lover" but it wasn't the directors idea to do it anyway since he hasn't had an original idea since his haircut was current.
Pretty much any time you see a photo set in an interesting setting forget it because the director can't film anything but oral and two positions in a stationary setting - bed, couch, bathroom.
I like the pictures I just think unless they are accurate to the scene then they are false advertising. I mean if you go to a resturant and order steak but they bring you hamburger do you accept it because they are both beef or do you ask where the fuck is your steak?















